@article {2103, title = {Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie / Journal of Psychology}, volume = {216}, year = {2008}, pages = {12-21}, abstract = {

A computerized adaptive testing (CAT) procedure was simulated with ordinal polytomous personality data collected using a
conventional paper-and-pencil testing format. An adapted Dutch version of the dominance scale of Gough and Heilbrun\’s Adjective
Check List (ACL) was used. This version contained Likert response scales with five categories. Item parameters were estimated using Samejima\’s graded response model from the responses of 1,925 subjects. The CAT procedure was simulated using the responses of 1,517 other subjects. The value of the required standard error in the stopping rule of the CAT was manipulated. The relationship between CAT latent trait estimates and estimates based on all dominance items was studied. Additionally, the pattern of relationships between the CAT latent trait estimates and the other ACL scales was compared to that between latent trait estimates based on the entire item pool and the other ACL scales. The CAT procedure resulted in latent trait estimates qualitatively equivalent to latent trait estimates based on all items, while a substantial reduction of the number of used items could be realized (at the stopping rule of 0.4 about 33\% of the 36 items was used).

}, keywords = {Adaptive Testing, cmoputer-assisted testing, Item Response Theory, Likert scales, Personality Measures}, doi = {10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12}, author = {Hol, A. M. and Vorst, H. C. M. and Mellenbergh, G. J.} } @article {199, title = {Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms}, journal = {Applied Psychological Measurement}, volume = {31}, number = {5}, year = {2007}, note = {10.1177/0146621606297314Journal; Peer Reviewed Journal; Journal Article}, pages = {412-429}, abstract = {In a randomized experiment (n=515), a computerized and a computerized adaptive test (CAT) are compared. The item pool consists of 24 polytomous motivation items. Although items are carefully selected, calibration data show that Samejima{\textquoteright}s graded response model did not fit the data optimally. A simulation study is done to assess possible consequences of model misfit. CAT efficiency was studied by a systematic comparison of the CAT with two types of conventional fixed length short forms, which are created to be good CAT competitors. Results showed no essential administration mode effects. Efficiency analyses show that CAT outperformed the short forms in almost all aspects when results are aggregated along the latent trait scale. The real and the simulated data results are very similar, which indicate that the real data results are not affected by model misfit. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA ) (journal abstract)}, keywords = {2220 Tests \& Testing, Adaptive Testing, Attitude Measurement, computer adaptive testing, Computer Assisted Testing, items, Motivation, polytomous motivation, Statistical Validity, Test Administration, Test Forms, Test Items}, isbn = {0146-6216}, author = {Hol, A. M. and Vorst, H. C. M. and Mellenbergh, G. J.} } @booklet {1406, title = {A CAT with personality and attitude}, year = {2006}, note = {$\#$HO06-01 .}, address = {Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B}, author = {Hol, A. M.} }