@inbook {1808,
	title = {Adaptive item calibration: A process for estimating item parameters within a computerized adaptive test},
	year = {2009},
	note = {{PDF File, 286 KB} {PDF File, 286 KB}},
	address = {D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.},
	abstract = {The characteristics of an adaptive test change the characteristics of the field testing that is necessary to add items to an existing measurement scale.  The process used to add field-test items to the adaptive test might lead to scale drift or disrupt the test by administering items of inappropriate difficulty.  The current study makes use of the transitivity of examinee and item in item response theory to describe a process for adaptive item calibration.  In this process an item is successively administered to examinees whose ability levels match the performance of a given field-test item.  By treating the item as if it were taking an adaptive test, examinees can be selected who provide the most information about the item at its momentary difficulty level.  This should provide a more efficient procedure for estimating item parameters.  The process is described within the context of the one-parameter logistic IRT model.  The process is then simulated to identify whether it can be more accurate and efficient than random presentation of field-test items to examinees.  Results indicated that adaptive item calibration might provide a viable approach to item calibration within the context of an adaptive test.  It might be most useful for expanding item pools in settings with small sample sizes or needs for large numbers of items.},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G.}
}
@article {224,
	title = {Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing},
	journal = {Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice},
	volume = {12},
	number = {1},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {21-27},
	keywords = {computerized adaptive testing},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Houser, R.L.}
}
@article {592,
	title = {Adapting adaptive testing: Using the MicroCAT Testing System in a local school district},
	journal = {Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice},
	volume = {29 (2)},
	year = {1990},
	pages = {3-6},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G.}
}
@conference {975,
	title = {Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing},
	booktitle = {A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education},
	year = {1990},
	address = {Boston MA},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Houser, R.L.}
}
@conference {974,
	title = {Assessing the impact of using item parameter estimates obtained from paper-and-pencil testing for computerized adaptive testing},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education},
	year = {1989},
	note = {$\#$KI89-01},
	address = {San Francisco},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Houser, R.L.}
}
@article {222,
	title = {Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change due to instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures},
	journal = {Dissertation Abstracts International},
	volume = {45},
	number = {9-B},
	year = {1985},
	pages = {3057},
	keywords = {computerized adaptive testing},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G.}
}
@book {1678,
	title = {Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change in instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures},
	year = {1984},
	address = {Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univerity of Minnesota, Minneapolis},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G.}
}
@booklet {1422,
	title = {An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5)},
	year = {1980},
	note = {{PDF file, 1.11 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
@booklet {1420,
	title = {An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5)},
	year = {1979},
	note = {{PDF file, 2.146 MB}},
	address = {Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program},
	author = {Kingsbury, G. G. and Weiss,  D. J.}
}
