@article {135,
	title = {Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version},
	journal = {Psychological Assessment},
	volume = {19},
	number = {1},
	year = {2007},
	note = {Forbey, Johnathan DBen-Porath, Yossef SResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov{\textquoteright}tUnited StatesPsychological assessmentPsychol Assess. 2007 Mar;19(1):14-24.},
	month = {Mar},
	pages = {14-24},
	edition = {2007/03/21},
	abstract = {Computerized adaptive testing in personality assessment can improve efficiency by significantly reducing the number of items administered to answer an assessment question. Two approaches have been explored for adaptive testing in computerized personality assessment: item response theory and the countdown method. In this article, the authors review the literature on each and report the results of an investigation designed to explore the utility, in terms of item and time savings, and validity, in terms of correlations with external criterion measures, of an expanded countdown method-based research version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version (MMPI-2-CA). Participants were 433 undergraduate college students (170 men and 263 women). Results indicated considerable item savings and corresponding time savings for the adaptive testing modalities compared with a conventional computerized MMPI-2 administration. Furthermore, computerized adaptive administration yielded comparable results to computerized conventional administration of the MMPI-2 in terms of both test scores and their validity. Future directions for computerized adaptive personality testing are discussed.},
	keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*statistics \& numerical data, Female, Humans, Male, MMPI/*statistics \& numerical data, Personality Assessment/*statistics \& numerical data, Psychometrics/statistics \& numerical data, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results},
	isbn = {1040-3590 (Print)},
	author = {Forbey, J. D. and Ben-Porath, Y. S.}
}
@article {183,
	title = {Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI-2 in a clinical setting},
	journal = {Psychological Assessment},
	volume = {11},
	number = {3},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {369-380},
	author = {Handel, R. W. and Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Watt, M. E.}
}
@conference {942,
	title = {Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.},
	year = {1997},
	author = {Handel, R. W. and Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Watt, M.}
}
@article {341,
	title = {Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2},
	journal = {Journal of Personality Assessment},
	volume = {65},
	number = {2},
	year = {1995},
	note = {Roper, B LBen-Porath, Y SButcher, J NUnited StatesJournal of personality assessmentJ Pers Assess. 1995 Oct;65(2):358-71.},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {358-71},
	edition = {1995/10/01},
	abstract = {The comparability and validity of a computerized adaptive (CA) Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 571 undergraduate college students. The CA MMPI-2 administered adaptively Scales L, E the 10 clinical scales, and the 15 content scales, utilizing the countdown method (Butcher, Keller, \& Bacon, 1985). All subjects completed the MMPI-2 twice, with three experimental conditions: booklet test-retest, booklet-CA, and conventional computerized (CC)-CA. Profiles across administration modalities show a high degree of similarity, providing evidence for the comparability of the three forms. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and other psychometric measures (Beck Depression Inventory; Symptom Checklist-Revised; State-Trait Anxiety and Anger Scales; and the Anger Expression Scale) support the validity of the CA MMPI-2. Substantial item savings may be realized with the implementation of the countdown procedure.},
	isbn = {0022-3891 (Print)},
	author = {Roper, B. L. and Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Butcher, J. N.}
}
@conference {842,
	title = {Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2},
	year = {1992},
	address = {Minneapolis MN},
	author = {Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Roper, B. L.}
}
@article {340,
	title = {Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2},
	journal = {Journal of Personality Assessment},
	volume = {57},
	number = {2},
	year = {1991},
	note = {Roper, B LBen-Porath, Y SButcher, J NUnited StatesJournal of personality assessmentJ Pers Assess. 1991 Oct;57(2):278-90.},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {278-290},
	edition = {1991/01/01},
	abstract = {A computerized adaptive version and the standard version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were administered 1 week apart to a sample of 155 college students to assess the comparability of the two versions. The countdown method was used to adaptively administer Scales L, F, the I0 clinical scales, and the 15 new content scales. Profiles across administration modalities show a high degree of similarity, providing evidence for the comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Substantial item savings were found with the adaptive version. Future directions in the study of adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 are discussed.},
	isbn = {0022-3891 (Print)},
	author = {Roper, B. L. and Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Butcher, J. N.}
}
@conference {841,
	title = {A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association},
	year = {1988},
	address = {Atlanta GA},
	author = {Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Waller, N. G. and Slutske, W. S. and Butcher, J. N.}
}
