@article {341,
	title = {Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2},
	journal = {Journal of Personality Assessment},
	volume = {65},
	number = {2},
	year = {1995},
	note = {Roper, B LBen-Porath, Y SButcher, J NUnited StatesJournal of personality assessmentJ Pers Assess. 1995 Oct;65(2):358-71.},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {358-71},
	edition = {1995/10/01},
	abstract = {The comparability and validity of a computerized adaptive (CA) Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 571 undergraduate college students. The CA MMPI-2 administered adaptively Scales L, E the 10 clinical scales, and the 15 content scales, utilizing the countdown method (Butcher, Keller, \& Bacon, 1985). All subjects completed the MMPI-2 twice, with three experimental conditions: booklet test-retest, booklet-CA, and conventional computerized (CC)-CA. Profiles across administration modalities show a high degree of similarity, providing evidence for the comparability of the three forms. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and other psychometric measures (Beck Depression Inventory; Symptom Checklist-Revised; State-Trait Anxiety and Anger Scales; and the Anger Expression Scale) support the validity of the CA MMPI-2. Substantial item savings may be realized with the implementation of the countdown procedure.},
	isbn = {0022-3891 (Print)},
	author = {Roper, B. L. and Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Butcher, J. N.}
}
@article {339,
	title = {Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2},
	journal = {Dissertation Abstracts International},
	volume = {53},
	number = {7-B},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {3791},
	keywords = {computerized adaptive testing},
	author = {Roper, B. L.}
}
@conference {842,
	title = {Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2},
	year = {1992},
	address = {Minneapolis MN},
	author = {Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Roper, B. L.}
}
@article {340,
	title = {Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2},
	journal = {Journal of Personality Assessment},
	volume = {57},
	number = {2},
	year = {1991},
	note = {Roper, B LBen-Porath, Y SButcher, J NUnited StatesJournal of personality assessmentJ Pers Assess. 1991 Oct;57(2):278-90.},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {278-290},
	edition = {1991/01/01},
	abstract = {A computerized adaptive version and the standard version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were administered 1 week apart to a sample of 155 college students to assess the comparability of the two versions. The countdown method was used to adaptively administer Scales L, F, the I0 clinical scales, and the 15 new content scales. Profiles across administration modalities show a high degree of similarity, providing evidence for the comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Substantial item savings were found with the adaptive version. Future directions in the study of adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 are discussed.},
	isbn = {0022-3891 (Print)},
	author = {Roper, B. L. and Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Butcher, J. N.}
}
