@article {2484,
	title = {Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing},
	journal = {Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice},
	volume = {34},
	number = {41-48},
	year = {2015},
	abstract = {The alignment between a test and the content domain it measures represents key evidence for the validation of test score inferences. Although procedures have been developed for evaluating the content alignment of linear tests, these procedures are not readily applicable to computerized adaptive tests (CATs), which require large item pools and do not use fixed test forms. This article describes the decisions made in the development of CATs that influence and might threaten content alignment. It outlines a process for evaluating alignment that is sensitive to these threats and gives an empirical example of the process.},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094},
	author = {Wise, S. L. and Kingsbury, G. G. and Webb, N. L.}
}
@article {808,
	title = {Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing},
	journal = {Applied Measurement in Education},
	volume = {12},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {185-198},
	author = {Wise, S. L. and Finney, S. J., and Enders, C. K. and Freeman, S.A. and Severance, D.D.}
}
@conference {1264,
	title = {Examinee issues in CAT},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education},
	year = {1997},
	note = {[ERIC ED 408 329]},
	address = {Chicago IL},
	author = {Wise, S. L.}
}
@conference {1129,
	title = {The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests},
	booktitle = {Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE},
	year = {1992},
	address = {San Francisco},
	author = {Roos, L. L. and Plake, B. S. and Wise, S. L.}
}
