01199nas a2200133   4500008004100000245009400041210006900135300001200204490000700216520068800223100002400911700001400935856011600949       1992                        eng d00aConfidence in pass/fail decisions for computer adaptive and paper and pencil examinations0 aConfidence in passfail decisions for computer adaptive and paper  a453-4640 v153 aCompared the level of confidence in pass/fail decisions obtained with computer adaptive tests (CADTs) and pencil-and-paper tests (PPTs). 600 medical technology students took a variable-length CADT and 2 fixed-length PPTs. The CADT was stopped when the examinee ability estimate was either 1.3 times the standard error of measurement above or below the pass/fail point or when a maximum test length was reached. Results show that greater confidence in the accuracy of the pass/fail decisions was obtained for more examinees when the CADT implemented a 90% confidence stopping rule than with PPTs of comparable test length. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2002 APA, all rights reserved).1 aBergstrom, Betty, A1 aLunz, M E  uhttp://mail.iacat.org/content/confidence-passfail-decisions-computer-adaptive-and-paper-and-pencil-examinations