02866nas a2200325   4500008004100000020002700041245007400068210006900142250001500211260000800226300001100234490000700245520188300252653003202135653003202167653002502199653002302224653004802247653001102295653001102306653000902317653001602326653001902342653002702361100001502388700001502403700001002418700001202428856010002440       2008                        eng d  a1537-7385 (Electronic)00aAdaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment0 aAdaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome asses  a2008/09/23  cOct  a842-520 v873 aOBJECTIVE: To develop outpatient Adaptive Short Forms for the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care item bank for use in outpatient therapy settings. DESIGN: A convenience sample of 11,809 adults with spine, lower limb, upper limb, and miscellaneous orthopedic impairments who received outpatient rehabilitation in 1 of 127 outpatient rehabilitation clinics in the United States. We identified optimal items for use in developing outpatient Adaptive Short Forms based on the Basic Mobility and Daily Activities domains of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care item bank. Patient scores were derived from the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care computerized adaptive testing program. Items were selected for inclusion on the Adaptive Short Forms based on functional content, range of item coverage, measurement precision, item exposure rate, and data collection burden. RESULTS: Two outpatient Adaptive Short Forms were developed: (1) an 18-item Basic Mobility Adaptive Short Form and (2) a 15-item Daily Activities Adaptive Short Form, derived from the same item bank used to develop the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care computerized adaptive testing program. Both Adaptive Short Forms achieved acceptable psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS: In outpatient postacute care settings where computerized adaptive testing outcome applications are currently not feasible, item response theory-derived Adaptive Short Forms provide the efficient capability to monitor patients' functional outcomes. The development of Adaptive Short Form functional outcome instruments linked by a common, calibrated item bank has the potential to create a bridge to outcome monitoring across postacute care settings and can facilitate the eventual transformation from Adaptive Short Forms to computerized adaptive testing applications easier and more acceptable to the rehabilitation community.10a*Activities of Daily Living10a*Ambulatory Care Facilities10a*Mobility Limitation10a*Treatment Outcome10aDisabled Persons/psychology/*rehabilitation10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aQuestionnaires10aRehabilitation Centers1 aJette, A M1 aHaley, S M1 aNi, P1 aMoed, R  uhttp://mail.iacat.org/content/adaptive-short-forms-outpatient-rehabilitation-outcome-assessment02124nas a2200253   4500008004100000245007900041210006900120300001200189490000700201520113300208653002701341653004601368653005201414653002901466653001101495653005601506653002501562653004101587653004501628653006201673100001501735700001501750856010501765       2005                        eng d00aContemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment0 aContemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes   a339-3450 v373 aIn this article, we review the limitations of traditional rehabilitation functional outcome instruments currently in use within the rehabilitation field to assess Activity and Participation domains as defined by the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health. These include a narrow scope of functional outcomes, data incompatibility across instruments, and the precision vs feasibility dilemma. Following this, we illustrate how contemporary measurement techniques, such as item response theory methods combined with computer adaptive testing methodology, can be applied in rehabilitation to design functional outcome instruments that are comprehensive in scope, accurate, allow for compatibility across instruments, and are sensitive to clinically important change without sacrificing their feasibility. Finally, we present some of the pressing challenges that need to be overcome to provide effective dissemination and training assistance to ensure that current and future generations of rehabilitation professionals are familiar with and skilled in the application of contemporary outcomes measurement.10a*Disability Evaluation10aActivities of Daily Living/classification10aDisabled Persons/classification/*rehabilitation10aHealth Status Indicators10aHumans10aOutcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods/standards10aRecovery of Function10aResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramural10aResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.10aSensitivity and Specificity computerized adaptive testing1 aJette, A M1 aHaley, S M  uhttp://mail.iacat.org/content/contemporary-measurement-techniques-rehabilitation-outcomes-assessment03708nas a2200481   4500008004100000245005200041210005200093300001200145490000700157520221100164653001902375653002902394653005802423653001002481653005302491653000902544653001102553653002502564653002602589653003302615653001102648653001002659653000902669653001602678653002402694653007402718653001802792653002902810653005802839653003102897653003202928653003602960653003202996100001503028700001603043700001603059700001603075700001003091700001403101700001803115700001503133856007803148       2004                        eng d00aActivity outcome measurement for postacute care0 aActivity outcome measurement for postacute care  aI49-1610 v423 aBACKGROUND: Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of a broad range of postacute care services have been hindered by the lack of conceptually sound and comprehensive measures of outcomes. It is critical to determine a common underlying structure before employing current methods of item equating across outcome instruments for future item banking and computer-adaptive testing applications. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factor structure, reliability, and scale properties of items underlying the Activity domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for use in postacute care outcome measurement. METHODS: We developed a 41-item Activity Measure for Postacute Care (AM-PAC) that assessed an individual's execution of discrete daily tasks in his or her own environment across major content domains as defined by the ICF. We evaluated the reliability and discriminant validity of the prototype AM-PAC in 477 individuals in active rehabilitation programs across 4 rehabilitation settings using factor analyses, tests of item scaling, internal consistency reliability analyses, Rasch item response theory modeling, residual component analysis, and modified parallel analysis. RESULTS: Results from an initial exploratory factor analysis produced 3 distinct, interpretable factors that accounted for 72% of the variance: Applied Cognition (44%), Personal Care & Instrumental Activities (19%), and Physical & Movement Activities (9%); these 3 activity factors were verified by a confirmatory factor analysis. Scaling assumptions were met for each factor in the total sample and across diagnostic groups. Internal consistency reliability was high for the total sample (Cronbach alpha = 0.92 to 0.94), and for specific diagnostic groups (Cronbach alpha = 0.90 to 0.95). Rasch scaling, residual factor, differential item functioning, and modified parallel analyses supported the unidimensionality and goodness of fit of each unique activity domain. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-factor model of the AM-PAC can form the conceptual basis for common-item equating and computer-adaptive applications, leading to a comprehensive system of outcome instruments for postacute care settings.10a*Self Efficacy10a*Sickness Impact Profile10aActivities of Daily Living/*classification/psychology10aAdult10aAftercare/*standards/statistics & numerical data10aAged10aBoston10aCognition/physiology10aDisability Evaluation10aFactor Analysis, Statistical10aFemale10aHuman10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMovement/physiology10aOutcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods/statistics & numerical data10aPsychometrics10aQuestionnaires/standards10aRehabilitation/*standards/statistics & numerical data10aReproducibility of Results10aSensitivity and Specificity10aSupport, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.10aSupport, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.1 aHaley, S M1 aCoster, W J1 aAndres, P L1 aLudlow, L H1 aNi, P1 aBond, T L1 aSinclair, S J1 aJette, A M  uhttp://mail.iacat.org/content/activity-outcome-measurement-postacute-care