05519nas a2200193 4500008004100000245009000041210006900131260005500200520480200255653002305057653001905080653002105099653002605120100002205146700002005168700001605188700001905204856010205223 2017 eng d00aAdaptive Item and Feedback Selection in Personalized Learning with a Network Approach0 aAdaptive Item and Feedback Selection in Personalized Learning wi aNiigata, JapanbNiigata Seiryo Universityc08/20173 a

Personalized learning is a term used to describe educational systems that adapt student-specific curriculum sequencing, pacing, and presentation based on their unique backgrounds, knowledge, preferences, interests, and learning goals. (Chen, 2008; Netcoh, 2016). The technological approach to personalized learning provides data-driven models to incorporate these adaptations automatically. Examples of applications include online learning systems, educational games, and revision-aid systems. In this study we introduce Bayesian networks as a methodology to implement an adaptive framework within a personalized learning environment. Existing ideas from Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) with Item Response Theory (IRT), where choices about content provision are based on maximizing information, are related to the goals of personalized learning environments. Personalized learning entails other goals besides efficient ability estimation by maximizing information, such as an adaptive configuration of preferences and feedback to the student. These considerations will be discussed and their application in networks will be illustrated.

Adaptivity in Personalized Learning.In standard CAT’s there is a focus on selecting items that provide maximum information about the ability of an individual at a certain point in time (Van der Linden & Glas, 2000). When learning is the main goal of testing, alternative adaptive item selection methods were explored by Eggen (2012). The adaptive choices made in personalized learning applications require additional adaptivity with respect to the following aspects; the moment of feedback, the kind of feedback, and the possibility for students to actively influence the learning process.

Bayesian Networks and Personalized Learning.Personalized learning aims at constructing a framework to incorporate all the aspects mentioned above. Therefore, the goal of this framework is not only to focus on retrieving ability estimates by choosing items on maximum information, but also to construct a framework that allows for these other factors to play a role. Plajner and Vomlel (2016) have already applied Bayesian Networks to adaptive testing, selecting items with help of entropy reduction. Almond et al. (2015) provide a reference work on Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment. Both acknowledge the potential of the method in terms of features such as modularity options to build finer-grained models. IRT does not allow to model sub-skills very easily and to gather information on fine-grained level, due to its dependency on the assumption of generally one underlying trait. The local independence assumption in IRT implies being interested in mainly the student’s overall ability on the subject of interest. When the goal is to improve student’s learning, we are not just interested in efficiently coming to their test score on a global subject. One wants a model that is able to map educational problems and talents in detail over the whole educational program, while allowing for dependency between items. The moment in time can influence topics to be better mastered than others, and this is exactly what we can to get out of a model. The possibility to model flexible structures, estimate abilities on a very detailed level for sub-skills and to easily incorporate other variables such as feedback in Bayesian Networks makes it a very promising method for making adaptive choices in personalized learning. It is shown in this research how item and feedback selection can be performed with help of the promising Bayesian Networks. A student involvement possibility is also introduced and evaluated.

References

Almond, R. G., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., Yan, D., & Williamson, D. M. (2015). Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment. Test. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98138-3

Eggen, T.J.H.M. (2012) Computerized Adaptive Testing Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Learning Systems. In: Eggen. TJHM & Veldkamp, BP.. (Eds). Psychometrics in Practice at RCEC. Enschede: RCEC

Netcoh, S. (2016, March). “What Do You Mean by ‘Personalized Learning?’. Croscutting Conversations in Education – Research, Reflections & Practice. Blogpost.

Plajner, M., & Vomlel, J. (2016). Student Skill Models in Adaptive Testing. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models (pp. 403-414).

Van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Session Video

10afeedback selection10aitem selection10anetwork approach10apersonalized learning1 avan Buuren, Nikky1 aStraat, Hendrik1 aEggen, Theo1 aFox, Jean-Paul uhttp://mail.iacat.org/adaptive-item-and-feedback-selection-personalized-learning-network-approach03876nas a2200193 4500008004100000245007700041210006900118260005500187520320800242653000803450653002103458653001603479100002003495700001803515700002003533700003803553700002003591856007103611 2017 eng d00aMulti-stage Testing for a Multi-disciplined End-of primary-school Test 0 aMultistage Testing for a Multidisciplined Endof primaryschool Te aNiigata, JapanbNiigata Seiryo Universityc08/20173 a

The Dutch secondary education system consists of five levels: basic, lower, and middle vocational education, general secondary education, and pre-academic education. The individual decision for level of secondary education is based on a combination of the teacher’s judgment and an end-of-primaryschool placement test.

This placement test encompasses the measurement of reading, language, mathematics and writing; each skill consisting of one to four subdomains. The Dutch end-of-primaryschool test is currently administered in two linear 200-item paper-based versions. The two versions differ in difficulty so as to motivate both less able and more able students, and measure both groups of students precisely. The primary goal of the test is providing a placement advice for five levels of secondary education. The secondary goal is the assessment of six different fundamental reference levels defined on reading, language, and mathematics. Because of the high stakes advice of the test, the Dutch parliament has instructed to change the format to a multistage test. A major advantage of multistage testing is that the tailoring of the tests is more strongly related to the ability of the students than to the teacher’s judgment. A separate multistage test is under development for each of the three skills measured by the reference levels to increase the classification accuracy for secondary education placement and to optimally measure the performance on the reference-level-related skills.

This symposium consists of three presentations discussing the challenges in transitioning from a linear paper-based test to a computer-based multistage test within an existing curriculum and the specification of the multistage test to meet the measurement purposes. The transitioning to a multistage test has to improve both classification accuracy and measurement precision.

First, we describe the Dutch educational system and the role of the end-of-primary-school placement test within this system. Special attention will be paid to the advantages of multistage testing over both linear testing and computerized adaptive testing, and on practical implications related to the transitioning from a linear to a multistage test.

Second, we discuss routing and reporting on the new multi-stage test. Both topics have a major impact on the quality of the placement advice and the reference mastery decisions. Several methods for routing and reporting are compared.

Third, the linear test contains 200 items to cover a broad range of different skills and to obtain a precise measurement of those skills separately. Multistage testing creates opportunities to reduce the cognitive burden for the students while maintaining the same quality of placement advice and assessment of mastering of reference levels. This presentation focuses on optimal allocation of items to test modules, optimal number of stages and modules per stage and test length reduction.

Session Video 1

Session Video 2

10amst10aMultidisciplined10aproficiency1 aStraat, Hendrik1 aGroen, Maaike1 aZijlstra, Wobbe1 aKeizer-Mittelhaëuser, Marie-Anne1 aLamoré, Michel uhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=1C5ys178p_Wl9eemQuIsI56IxDTck2z8P