02338nas a2200145   4500008004100000020002200041245011100063210006900174250001500243300001200258490000700270520177800277100001602055856012102071       2007                        eng d  a0962-9343 (Print)00aApplying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: The challenges for health outcomes assessment0 aApplying item response theory and computer adaptive testing The   a2007/04/10  a187-1940 v163 aOBJECTIVES: We review the papers presented at the NCI/DIA conference, to identify areas of controversy and uncertainty, and to highlight those aspects of item response theory (IRT) and computer adaptive testing (CAT) that require theoretical or empirical research in order to justify their application to patient reported outcomes (PROs). BACKGROUND: IRT and CAT offer exciting potential for the development of a new generation of PRO instruments. However, most of the research into these techniques has been in non-healthcare settings, notably in education. Educational tests are very different from PRO instruments, and consequently problematic issues arise when adapting IRT and CAT to healthcare research. RESULTS: Clinical scales differ appreciably from educational tests, and symptoms have characteristics distinctly different from examination questions. This affects the transferring of IRT technology. Particular areas of concern when applying IRT to PROs include inadequate software, difficulties in selecting models and communicating results, insufficient testing of local independence and other assumptions, and a need of guidelines for estimating sample size requirements. Similar concerns apply to differential item functioning (DIF), which is an important application of IRT. Multidimensional IRT is likely to be advantageous only for closely related PRO dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Although IRT and CAT provide appreciable potential benefits, there is a need for circumspection. Not all PRO scales are necessarily appropriate targets for this methodology. Traditional psychometric methods, and especially qualitative methods, continue to have an important role alongside IRT. Research should be funded to address the specific concerns that have been identified.1 aFayers, P M  uhttp://mail.iacat.org/content/applying-item-response-theory-and-computer-adaptive-testing-challenges-health-outcomes