Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L..  (2011).  Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Kingsbury, G. G., & Hauser, C..  (2004).  Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A..  (1999).  A comparison of conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Kingsbury, G. G.  (1991).  A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A..  (1991).  A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 241-261.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L..  (1988).  A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Kingsbury, G. G., & et. al.,.  (1988).  Computerized adaptive testing: A four-year-old pilot study shows that CAT can work. Technological Horizons in Education, 16 (4), 73-76.

Kingsbury, G. G.  (1986).  Computerized adaptive testing: A pilot project. In . W. C. Ryan (ed.), Proceedings: NECC 86, National Educational Computing Conference (pp.172-176). Eugene OR: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1980).  A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J..  (1980).  A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Kingsbury, G. G..  (1977).  Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.