Tai, M. Him, Cooperman, A. W., DeWeese, J. N., & Weiss, D. J..  (2023).  How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032

Reckase, M., Ju, U., & Kim, S..  (2019).  How Adaptive Is an Adaptive Test: Are All Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1902-0701001

Xiong, X.  (2018).  A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 630-643. doi:10.1177/0146621618762739

Born, S., & Frey, A..  (2017).  Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 241-262. doi:10.1177/0013164416643744

Reckase, M. D.  (2017).  How Adaptive is an Adaptive Test: Are all Adaptive Tests Adaptive?. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nj-zDCKk3DvHA4Jlp1qkb2XovmHeQfxu

Zheng, C., & Chang, H. - H..  (2016).  High-Efficiency Response Distribution?Based Item Selection Algorithms for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 608-624. doi:10.1177/0146621616665196

Wang, S., Lin, H., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J..  (2016).  Hybrid Computerized Adaptive Testing: From Group Sequential Design to Fully Sequential Design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 45?62. doi:10.1111/jedm.12100

Chien, Y., Shin, D., & Way, W. D..  (2011).  A Heuristic Of CAT Item Selection Procedure For Testlets. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Krishnan, E.  (2011).  High-throughput Health Status Measurement using CAT in the Era of Personal Genomics: Opportunities and Challenges. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Frey, A., & Seitz, N. - N..  (2011).  Hypothetical use of multidimensional adaptive testing for the assessment of student achievement in PISA. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 503-522.

Nydick, S. W., & Weiss, D. J..  (2009).  A hybrid simulation procedure for the development of CATs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Frey, A., & Ehmke, T..  (2007).  Hypothetischer Einsatz adaptiven Testens bei der Messung von Bildungsstandards in Mathematik [Hypothetical use of adaptive testing for the measurement of educational standards in mathematics] . . Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 169-184.

Chuah, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Luecht, R..  (2006).  How Big Is Big Enough? Sample Size Requirements for CAST Item Parameter Estimation. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 241-255. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_5

Blais, J. G.  (2002).  Historique et concepts propres au testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing: Historical accounts and concepts]. In Presented at the 69th Congress of the Acfas. Sherbrooke: Association canadienne française pour l?avancement des sciences (Acfas). [In French].

Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J..  (2002).  Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.

van der Linden, W. J.  (1999).  Het ontwerpen van adaptieve examens [Designing adaptive tests]. In . J. M Pieters, Tj. Plomp, and L.E. Odenthal (Eds.), Twintig jaar Toegepaste Onderwijskunde: Een kaleidoscopisch overzicht van Twents onderwijskundig onderzoek (pp. 249-267). Enschede: Twente University Press.

Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T..  (1998).  A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Nering, M. L., Davey, T., & Thompson, T..  (1998).  A hybrid method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.

Revicki, D. A., & Cella, D. F..  (1997).  Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595-600. presented at the Aug.

Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J..  (1996).  Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J..  (1996).  Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Luecht, R. M., Nungester, R. J., & Hadadi, A..  (1996).  Heuristics based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Stone, G. E.  (1994).  The historical developments of fit and its assessment in the computerized adaptive testing environment. In Midwestern Education Research Association annual meeting. presented at the 10/1994, Chicago, IL USA.

Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., De la Torre, R., Bleiler, T., & Dings, J..  (1992).  How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.

DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J..  (1976).  Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.