Svetina, D., Liaw, Y. - L., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D..  (2019).  Routing Strategies and Optimizing Design for Multistage Testing in International Large-Scale Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 192-213. doi:10.1111/jedm.12206

Shi, Y.  (2017).  Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2

Veldkamp, B. P., & Paap, M. C. S..  (2017).  Robust Automated Test Assembly for Testlet-Based Tests: An Illustration with Analytical Reasoning Items. Frontiers in Education, 2, 63. doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00063

Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L..  (2013).  The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720

Frey, A., Seitz, N. - N., & Kröhne, U..  (2013).  Reporting differentiated literacy results in PISA by using multidimensional adaptive testing. . In Research on PISA.. Dodrecht: Springer.

Davison, M. L., Semmes, R., Huang, L., & Close, C. N..  (2012).  On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Huebner, A..  (2011).  Restrictive Stochastic Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 255?273. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00145.x

Chien, T. W., Wu, H. M., Wang, W. - C., Castillo, R. V., & Chou, W..  (2009).  Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 39.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Jette, A. M., Tao, W., Moed, R., Meyers, D., & Ludlow, L. H..  (2009).  Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J..  (2008).  Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 618-625.

Riley, B. B., Conrad, K. J., Bezruczko, N., & Dennis, M. L..  (2007).  Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A..  (2007).  A review of item exposure control strategies for computerized adaptive testing developed from 1983 to 2005. Journal of Technology,Learning, and Assessment,,  5(8).

Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2005).  A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.

Hol, M. A., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J..  (2005).  A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268

Paek, P.  (2005).  Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.

Chang, S. - H., & Zhang, J..  (2005).  Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Bond, T. L., & Ni, P. S..  (2004).  Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62-172. presented at the Jan.

Harmes, J. C., Parshall, C. G., & Kromrey, J. D..  (2003).  Recalibration of IRT item parameters in CAT: Sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A..  (2003).  The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A..  (2003).  The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Chen, S., Ankenmann, R. D., & Spray, J. A..  (2003).  The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.

Papanastasiou, E. C.  (2002).  A ?rearrangement procedure? for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Chang, S. - W., & Harris, D. J..  (2002).  Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Wang, S., & Wang, T..  (2002).  Relative precision of ability estimation in polytomous CAT: A comparison under the generalized partial credit model and graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Jodoin, M. G.  (2002).  Reliability and decision accuracy of linear parallel form and multi stage tests with realistic and ideal item pools. In Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Based Testing and the Internet. Winchester, England.

Zhao, J. C., McMorris, R. F., Pruzek, R. M., & Chen, R..  (2002).  The robustness of the unidimensional 3PL IRT model when applied to two-dimensional data in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Papanastasiou, E. C.  (2001).  A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Way, W. D., Swanson, l,, & Stocking, M..  (2001).  Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Way, W. D., Swanson, L., Steffen, M., & Stocking, M. L..  (2001).  Refining a system for computerized adaptive testing pool creation (Research Report 01-18). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Olea Díaz, J., Ponsoda Gil, V., Revuelta Menéndez, J., Hontangas Beltrán, P., & Abad, F. J..  (2001).  Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigación en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]. Apuntes de Psicologia, 19, 11-28.

Forbey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S..  (2000).  A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Fobey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S..  (2000).  A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Wainer, H.,.  (2000).  Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf?s law. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 203-224.

Ware, J. E., J., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M..  (2000).  Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38, 73-82.

Sekula-Wacura, R.  (2000).  A review of CAT review. Popular Measurement, 3, 47-49.

Wise, S. L.  (1999).  The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Wang, T., Hanson, B. H., & Lau, C. - M. H..  (1999).  Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.

Holmes, R. M., & Segall, D. O..  (1999).  Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In  Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.

Dunkel, P.  (1999).  Research and development of a computer-adaptive test of listening comprehension in the less-commonly taught language Hausa. In . M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.). Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L..  (1999).  Response time feedback on computer-administered tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Zhao, J. C.  (1999).  The robustness of the unidimensional 3PL IRT model when applied to two-dimensional data in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. R., & Kirsch, I..  (1998).  The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Vispoel, W. P.  (1998).  Reviewing and changing answers on computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 328-345.

Davey, T., Nering, M., & Thompson, T..  (1997).  Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.

Swanson, D. B., Featherman, C. M., Case, A. M., Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R..  (1997).  Relationship of response latency to test design, examinee ability, and item difficulty in computer-based test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Moreno, K. E., & Segall, O. D..  (1997).  Reliability and construct validity of CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 169-179). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

McBride, J. R.  (1997).  Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In B. K.  Waters & McBride, J. R., Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Stocking, M. L.  (1997).  Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.

Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S..  (1997).  The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z..  (1996).  Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential design, and computerized adaptive testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L.  (1996).  Revising item responses in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models (RR-96-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Lau, C. A.  (1996).  Robustness of a unidimensional computerized testing mastery procedure with multidimensional testing data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.

Ying, Z., & Chang, H. - H..  (1995).  Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential designs, and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Eleventh Workshop on Item Response Theory. University of Twente, the Netherlands.

Andrich, D.  (1995).  Review of the book Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Psychometrika, 4?, 615-620.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S.,, & Nebelsick-Gullett, L. J..  (1994).  The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D..  (1994).  Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.

Sireci, S. G., Wainer, H.,, & Thissen, D..  (1991).  On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237-247.

Thissen, D.  (1990).  Reliability and measurement precision. In . H. Wainer, N. J. Dorans, R. Flaugher, B. F. Green, R. J. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, and D. Thissen (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 161-186). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Zara, A.  (1990).  A research proposal for field testing CAT for nursing licensure examinations. In . Delegate Assembly Book of Reports 1989. Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N..  (1989).  A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.

Zara, A.  (1989).  A research proposal for field testing CAT for nursing licensure examinations. In . Delegate Assembly Book of Reports 1989. Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

de Gruijter, D. N. M.  (1988).  The Rasch model and missing data, with an emphasis on tailoring test items. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April 5-9, New Orleans, LA. USA.

Glas, C. A. W.  (1988).  The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.

Kubinger, K. D.  (1988).  On a Rasch-model-based test for non-computerized adaptive testing. In . Langeheine, R. and Rost, J. (Ed.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.

Slutske, W. S., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N..  (1988).  A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., Chia, W. J., Szenas, P. L., & McBride, J. R..  (1988).  Refinement of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) (Final Report, Contract No MDA203 06-C-0373). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R..  (1985).  Reducing the predictability of adaptive item sequences. In . Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, 43-48.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J..  (1984).  Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J..  (1984).  Relationship Between Corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 155-163.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, D. C., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests (TR 83-27). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

McBride, J. R., & Martin, J. T..  (1983).  Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military setting. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 224-236). New York: Academic Press.

McBride, J. R., Martin, J. T., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military recruit population (Research Report 83-1). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Testing Laboratory.

Martin, J. T., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J..  (1983).  Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Weiss, D. J., & Suhadolnik, D..  (1982).  Robustness of adaptive testing to multidimensionality. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program. {PDF file, 1.

Kunce, C. S.  (1979).  The Rasch model in computerized personality testing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1979.

Vale, C. D., & Weiss, D. J..  (1977).  A rapid item search procedure for Bayesian adaptive testing (Research Report 77-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Killcross, M. C.  (1977).  Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.

Pine, S. M.  (1977).  Reduction of Test Bias by Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Hansen, D. N.  (1976).  Reflections on adaptive testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 90-94). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

McBride, J. R.  (1976).  Research on adaptive testing 1973-1976: A review of the literature. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.

Killcross, M. C.  (1976).  A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).

McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J..  (1974).  Recent and projected developments in ability testing by computer. In . Earl Jones (Ed.), Symposium Proceedings: Occupational Research and the Navy?Prospectus 1980 (TR-74-14). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Wood, R. L.  (1973).  Response-contingent testing. Review of Educational Research, 43, 529-544.

Hambleton, R. K.  (1973).  A review of testing and decision-making procedures (Technical Bulletin No. 15. Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Lord, F. M.  (1971).  Robbins-Monro procedures for tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 3-31.

Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Rock, D. A..  (1968).  Reproduction of total test score through the use of sequential programmed tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 183-187.