Export 348 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is H [Clear All Filters]
. (2004).
Adaptation of a-stratified method in variable length computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
. (2001). we01-01.pdf (383.76 KB) . (1997).
Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.
. (1989). Adaptive and Conventional Versions of the DAT: The First Complete Test Battery Comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 363-371.
. (1989). v13n4p363.pdf (1.06 MB)Adaptive assessment and training using the neighbourhood of knowledge states. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montral, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 578-587.
. (1996). Adaptive assessment using granularity hierarchies and Bayesian nets. In . Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. and Lesgold, A. (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Third International Conference, ITS'96, Montréal, Canada, June 1996 Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1086. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 569-577.
. (1996). Adaptive Branching in a Multi-Content Achievement Test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). pe77271.pdf (941.73 KB)Adaptive designs for Likert-type data: An approach for implementing marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 304-321.
. (1990). Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 842-52. presented at the Oct.
. (2008). . (2006).
Adaptive Testing Applied to Hierarchically Structured Objectives-Based Programs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). ha77290.pdf (1.37 MB)An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers and Education, 52, 53-67.
. (2009). Adjusting "scores" from a CAT following successful item challenges. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). wa99-01.pdf (149.06 KB)Adjusting "scores" from a CAT following successful item challenges. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). wa99-01.pdf (149.06 KB)The AMC Linear Disability Score project in a population requiring residential care: psychometric properties. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Aug 3.
. (2004). The AMC Linear Disability Score project in a population requiring residential care: psychometric properties. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Aug 3.
. (2004). Application of computerized adaptive testing to the University Entrance Exam of Taiwan, R.O.C. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3662.
. (1989). The application of item generators for individualizing mathematics testing and instruction (Report 1971/14). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.
. (1971). Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In , Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445-464). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. (2005). Are we ready for computerized adaptive testing?. Psychiatric Services, 59, 369. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). Assembling an Inventory of Multistage Adaptive Testing Systems. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 247-266). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Assessing Mobility in Children Using a Computer Adaptive Testing Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-939.
. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.
. (2005). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.
. (2008). Assessing the impact of using item parameter estimates obtained from paper-and-pencil testing for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1989). Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.
. (1993). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. In A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Boston MA.
. (1990). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
. (2004). Automated Simultaneous Assembly of Multistage Testlets for a High-Stakes Licensing Examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5-20. doi:10.1177/0013164406288162
. (2007). A Bayesian approach in sequential testing. In American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1974, Chicago IL.
. (1974). Benefits from computerized adaptive testing as seen in simulation studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 91-98.
. (1999). Calibration of CAT items administered online for classification: Assumption of local independence. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (1997). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.
. (2002). CAT item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.
. (1998). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.
. (2006). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
. (2000). A clinical study of consecutive and adaptive testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 93-103.
. (1947). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample. In Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.
. (1997). Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592
. (2008). A comparative study of ability estimates from computer-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.
. (1999). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.
. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.
. (2001). Comparing three item selection approaches for computerized adaptive testing with content balancing requirement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). le02-01.pdf (225.92 KB)The comparison among item selection strategies of CAT with multiple-choice items. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 778-783.
. (2006). Comparison and equating of paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive tests of achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
. (1986). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903
. (2012). A comparison of a standard and a computerized adaptive paradigm in Bekesy fixed-frequency audiometry. Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 1-22.
. (1979). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1988). ki88-01.pdf (42.27 KB)A Comparison of Exposure Control Procedures in CATs Using the 3PL Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 857-874. doi:10.1177/0013164413486802
. (2013). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503
. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503
. (2014). A comparison of item calibration media in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 197-204.
. (1994). A Comparison of Item Calibration Media in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3).
. (1994). v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB)Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.
. (1982). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.
. (1998). A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.
. (2002). Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
. (2017). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). jo02-01.pdf (280.31 KB)Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of Several Computer-Based Test Designs for Credentialing Exams With Multiple Purposes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 203-220. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_3
. (2006).