Guyer, R. D. (2008). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN.

Crichton, L. I. (1981). Effect of error in item parameter estimates on adaptive testing (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 06-B.

Arrowwood, V. E. (1994). Effects of computerized adaptive test anxiety on nursing licensure examinations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54 (9-A), 3410.

Mattson, J. D. (1983). Effects of item parameter error and other factors on trait estimation in latent trait based adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Nering, M. L. (1996). The effects of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Hankins, J. A. (1987). The effects of variable entry on bias and information of the Bayesian adaptive testing procedure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47 (8A), 3013.

Revuelta, J. (1995). El control de la exposicin de los items en tests adaptativos informatizados [Item exposure control in computerized adaptive tests]. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Universidad Autonma de Madrid, Spain.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Elements of Adaptive Testing (p. 437). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Waters, B. K. (1974). An empirical investigation of the stratified adaptive computerized testing model for the measurement of human ability. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University.

Auger, R. (1989). Étude de praticabilité du testing adaptatif de maîtrise des apprentissages scolaires au Québec : une expérimentation en éducation économique secondaire 5. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Montréal : Université du Québec à Montréal. [In French].

Zenisky, A. L. (2004). Evaluating the effects of several multi-stage testing design variables on selected psychometric outcomes for certification and licensure assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Olivier, P. (1974). An evaluation of the self-scoring flexilevel testing model. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (7-A), 4257.

Paterson, J. J. (1962). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Potenza, M. (1994). The exploration of an alternative method for scoring computer adaptive tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska.

Guyer, R. D., & Weiss, D. J.. (2009). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Gugel, J. F., Schmidt, F. L., & Urry, V. W.. (1976). Effectiveness of the ancillary estimation procedure. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 103-106). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Prestwood, J. S. (1977). Effects of Knowledge of Results and Varying Proportion Correct on Ability Test Performance and Psychological Variables. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1977). An empirical evaluation of implied orders as a basis for tailored testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Waters, B. K. (1976). An empirical investigation of Weiss' stradaptive testing model. In . C. L. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 54-63.). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission.

Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 181-198). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1994). The equivalence of Rasch item calibrations and ability estimates across modes of administration. In Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 122-128). Norwood, N.J. USA: Ablex Publishing Co.

Sympson, J. B. (1977). Estimation of latent trait status in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Applications of computerized testing (Research Report 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Glas, C. A. W., van der Linden, W. J., & Geerlings, H.. (2010). Estimation of the Parameters in an Item-Cloning Model for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 289-314). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M.. (1997). Evaluating item calibration medium in computerized adaptive testing. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters and J.R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 161-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Sympson, J. B. (1975). Evaluating the results of computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 26-31. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Ito, K., Pommerich, M., & Segall, D.. (2009). An evaluation of a new procedure for computing information functions for Bayesian scores from computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

McBride, J. R., & Hogan, P. F.. (1992). Evaluation of alternative operational concepts. In . Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Rudner, L. M. (2009). An examination of decision-theory adaptive testing procedures. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Edwards, M. C., & Thissen, D.. (2007). Exploring potential designs for multi-form structure computerized adaptive tests with uniform item exposure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

McBride, J. R. (1994). Early psychometric research in the CAT-ASVAB Project. In Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles. CA.

Fan, M., & Hsu, Y.. (1995). The effect of ability estimation for polytomous CAT in different item selection procedures. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Abdel-Fattah, A. A., Lau, C. A., & Spray, J. A.. (1996). Effect of altering passing score in CAT when unidimensionality is violated. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April, New York NY.

Reckase, M. D. (1975). The effect of item choice on ability estimation when using a simple logistic tailored testing model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.

Reckase, M. D. (1976). The effect of item pool characteristics on the operation of a tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Murray Hill NJ.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2003). The effect of item selection method on the variability of CAT’s ability estimates when item parameters are contaminated with measurement errors. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Kalohn, J. C., & Spray, J. A.. (1998). Effect of item selection on item exposure rates within a computerized classification test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Abdel-Fattah, A. A., & Lau, C. - M. A.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: UIRT versus MIRT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis MN.

Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., Schulz, M., & Fleer, J. P.. (1995). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: 3-PLM vs. 1PLM (and UIRT versus MIRT). In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Minneapolis, MN.

Chen, S., Hou, L., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Dodd, B. G.. (1995). The effect of population distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Ito, K., & Sykes, R. C.. (1994). The effect of restricting ability distributions in the estimation of item difficulties: Implications for a CAT implementation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

Rizavi, S., & Swaminathan, H.. (2001). The effect of test and examinee characteristics on the occurrence of aberrant response patterns in a computerized adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Samejima, F. (2001). Effective use of simulated data in an on-line item calibration in practical situations of computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Zhang, J., & Chang, H.. (2005). The effectiveness of using multiple item pools in computerized adaptive testing. In Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education . presented at the 04/2005, Montreal, Canada.

Vispoel, W. P., Brunsman, B., Forte, E., & Bleiler, T.. (1996). Effects of answer feedback and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.

Vispoel, W., Forte, E., & Boo, J.. (1996). Effects of answer review and test anxiety on the psychometric and motivational characteristics of computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Chang, S. - W., & Twu, B. - Y.. (2001). Effects of changes in the examinees’ ability distribution on the exposure control methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Holst, P. M., O’Donnell, A. M., & Rocklin, T. R.. (1992). Effects of feedback during self-adapted testing on estimates of ability. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S., & Wise, S. L.. (1992). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.

Segall, D. O. (1995). The effects of item compromise on computerized adaptive test scores. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL.

Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1994). The effects of item pool depth on the accuracy of pass/fail decisions for NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.

Hou, L., Chen, S., G., D. B., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1996). The effects of methods of theta estimation, prior distribution, and number of quadrature points on CAT using the graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York NY.

Segall, D. O. (1997). The effects of motivation on equating adaptive and conventional tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Ban, J. C., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2000). Effects of nonequivalence of item pools on ability estimates in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Patience, W. M., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). Effects of program parameters and item pool characteristics on the bias of a three-parameter tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Boston MA, U.

Featherman, C. M., Subhiyah, R. G., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). Effects of randomesque item selection on CAT item exposure rates and proficiency estimation under 1- and 2-PL models. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Yi, Q., Harris, D. J., Wang, T., & Ban, J. - C.. (2003). Effects of test administration mode on item parameter estimates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Han, S. - Y., & Yoo, Y. Joo. (2017). Efficiency of Item Selection in CD-CAT Based on Conjunctive Bayesian Network Modeling Hierarchical attributes. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RbO2gd4aULqsSgRi_VZudNN_edX82NeD

Berger, S., Verschoor, A. J., Eggen, T., & Moser, U.. (2017). Efficiency of Targeted Multistage Calibration Designs under Practical Constraints: A Simulation Study. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ko2LuiARKqsjL_6aupO4Pj9zgk6p_xhd/view?usp=sharing

Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1993). The efficiency, reliability, and concurrent validity of adaptive and fixed-item tests of music listening skills. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.

Samejima, F. (2001). Efficient on-line item calibration using a nonparametric method adjusted to computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.