Export 86 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is R [Clear All Filters]
. (1995).
Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 618-625.
. (2008). ba08618.pdf (266.26 KB)A real-data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 1, 18-22.
. (1989). Rescuing CAT by fixing the problems. In National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (2005). Recursive maximum likelihood estimation, sequential design, and computerized adaptive testing. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). Redeveloping the exposure control parameters of CAT items when a pool is modified. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ch02-02.pdf (1.09 MB)The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 129-145.
. (2003). Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 39.
. (2009). Reproduction of total test score through the use of sequential programmed tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 183-187.
. (1968). Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, I62-172. presented at the Jan.
. (2004). Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
. (1997). On the Reliability and Validity of a Numerical Reasoning Speed Dimension Derived From Response Times Collected in Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 245-263. doi:10.1177/0013164411408412
. (2012). Research and development of a computer-adaptive test of listening comprehension in the less-commonly taught language Hausa. In . M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.). Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
. (1999). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.
. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.
. (2000). Reporting differentiated literacy results in PISA by using multidimensional adaptive testing. . In Research on PISA.. Dodrecht: Springer.
. (2013). A review of item exposure control strategies for computerized adaptive testing developed from 1983 to 2005. Journal of Technology,Learning, and Assessment,, 5(8).
. (2007). ge07-01.pdf (319.09 KB)The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.
. (1988). The Rasch model and missing data, with an emphasis on tailoring test items. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April 5-9, New Orleans, LA. USA.
. (1988). Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Quality of Life Research, 18, 461-71. presented at the May.
. (2009). A review of testing and decision-making procedures (Technical Bulletin No. 15. Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.
. (1973). Reflections on adaptive testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 90-94). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). ha75-01.pdf (463.75 KB)Recalibration of IRT item parameters in CAT: Sparse data matrices and missing data treatments. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). ha03-01.pdf (625.24 KB)A randomized experiment to compare conventional, computerized, and computerized adaptive administration of ordinal polytomous attitude items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183.
. (2005). A Randomized Experiment to Compare Conventional, Computerized, and Computerized Adaptive Administration of Ordinal Polytomous Attitude Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 159-183. doi:10.1177/0146621604271268
. (2005). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
. (1999). Reliability and decision accuracy of linear parallel form and multi stage tests with realistic and ideal item pools. In Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Based Testing and the Internet. Winchester, England.
. (2002). A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).
. (1976). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
. (1977). On a Rasch-model-based test for non-computerized adaptive testing. In . Langeheine, R. and Rost, J. (Ed.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.
. (1988). The Rasch model in computerized personality testing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1979.
. (1979). Robustness of a unidimensional computerized testing mastery procedure with multidimensional testing data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City IA.
. (1996). la96-01.pdf (1.79 MB) . (1971).
Reliability of alternate computer adaptive tests. In Objective measurement, theory into practice (Vol. II). New Jersey: Ablex.
. (1994). Reliability and validity of adaptive vs. conventional tests in a military recruit population (Research Rep. No. 83-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). ma83-01.pdf (2.72 MB)Recent and projected developments in ability testing by computer. In . Earl Jones (Ed.), Symposium Proceedings: Occupational Research and the Navy–Prospectus 1980 (TR-74-14). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1974). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military setting. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 224-236). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military recruit population (Research Report 83-1). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). ma83-01_0.pdf (2.72 MB)Research antecedents of applied adaptive testing. In , Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to practice (xviii., pp. 47-57). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). Research on adaptive testing 1973-1976: A review of the literature. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
. (1976). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests (TR 83-27). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1983). Relationship Between Corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 155-163.
. (1984). v08n2p155.pdf (594.04 KB)Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.
. (1984). Reliability and construct validity of CAT-ASVAB. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 169-179). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
. (1997). . (2001).
Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
. (2001). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). pa02-01.pdf (409.97 KB)Reduction of Test Bias by Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). pi77128.pdf (734.76 KB)Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.
. (2007). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
. (1997). Response time feedback on computer-administered tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). . (2000).
Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2
. (2017). . (1991).
A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.
. (1988). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three models (RR-96-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1996). Revising item responses in computerized adaptive tests: A comparison of three models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 129-142.
. (1997).