Export 121 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is K  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
K
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (2011). Continuous Testing (an avenue for CAT research). In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Kingsbury Continuous Testing.pdf (74.37 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (2002). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon ki02-01.pdf (133.01 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1999). Developing computerized adaptive tests for school children. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 93-115). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Kingsbury, G., & Zara, T.. (2017). From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). A practical examination of the use of free-response questions in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Atlanta GA.
PDF icon ki93-01.pdf (29.04 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ki79-05.pdf (2.1 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1999). Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Kingsbury, G. G. (2009). Adaptive item calibration: A process for estimating item parameters within a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09kingsbury.pdf (285.12 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (1990). Adapting adaptive testing: Using the MicroCAT Testing System in a local school district. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29 (2), 3-6.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
PDF icon Kingsbury & weiss #1.pdf (642.36 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1990). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. In A paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Boston MA.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.
PDF icon ICAT- An Adaptive Testing Procedure for the Identification of Idiosyncratic Knowledge Patterns.pdf (322.62 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (1997). Some questions that must be addressed to develop and maintain an item pool for use in an adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1999). A procedure to compare conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Kingsbury, G. G. (1986). Computerized adaptive testing: A pilot project. In . W. C. Ryan (ed.), Proceedings: NECC 86, National Educational Computing Conference (pp.172-176). Eugene OR: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1981). A validity comparison of adaptive and conventional strategies for mastery testing (Research Report 81-3). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ki81-03.pdf (1.81 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1989). Assessing the impact of using item parameter estimates obtained from paper-and-pencil testing for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J.. (2007). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat07kim-kang.pdf (346.06 KB)
Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J.. (2008). Adaptive measurement of individual change. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216, 49-58. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.49
PDF icon ki08049.pdf (567.72 KB)
Kim, D. - H., & Huynh, H.. (2008). Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 554-570. doi:10.1177/0013164407310132
Kim, H., & Plake, B. S.. (1993). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta, GA.
Kim, S., Moses, T., & Yoo, H. (Henry). (2015). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
Kim, H. - O. (1994). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 54, 2548.
Kim, J., & McLean, J. E.. (1995). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
Kim, J., Chung, H., Dodd, B. G., & Park, R.. (2012). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977
Kim, J. (1993). Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
Killcross, M. C. (1974). A tailored testing system for selection and allocation in the British Army. In Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Applied Psychology. Montreal Canada.
Killcross, M. C., & Cassie, A.. (1973). The potential use of tailored testing for allocation to army employments. In NATO Conference on Utilisation of Human Resources. presented at the 06/1973, Lisbon, Portugal.
Killcross, M. C. (1977). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
Killcross, M. C. (1976). A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).
Kiely, G. L., Zara, A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Karino, C. A., Costa, D. R., & Laros, J. A.. (2009). Adequacy of an item pool measuring proficiency in English language to implement a CAT procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09karino.pdf (159.63 KB)
Kaplan, M., de la Torre, J., & Barrada, J. R.. (2015). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650
Kaplan, M., & de la Torre, J.. (2020). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500
Kang, H. - A., Zhang, S., & Chang, H. - H.. (2017). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139
Kandula, S., Ancker, J. S., Kaufman, D. R., Currie, L. M., & Qing, Z. - T.. (2011). A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(52). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-52
Kalohn, J. (2000). Test security and item exposure control for computer-based . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Educatio. Chicago.
Kalohn, J. C., & Spray, J. A.. (1998). Effect of item selection on item exposure rates within a computerized classification test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
Kalisch, S. J. (1980). Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .
Kalisch, S. J. (1974). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Educational Evaluation and Research Design Program.
Kalisch, S. J. (1980). A model for computerized adaptive testing related to instructional situations. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 101-119). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ka80-01.pdf (1 MB)
Kalender, I. (2011). Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
PDF icon kalender_dissertation1.pdf (993.04 KB)
PDF icon CAT_StudentSelection1.pdf (120.81 KB)

Pages