Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2002). Comparing three item selection approaches for computerized adaptive testing with content balancing requirement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Chen, P. H. (2009). Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.

Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801

Riley, B. B., Dennis, M. L., & Conrad, K. J.. (2010). A comparison of content-balancing procedures for estimating multiple clinical domains in computerized adaptive testing: Relative precision, validity, and detection of persons with misfitting responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423.

Riley, B. B., Dennis, M. L., & Conrad, K. J.. (2010). A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Chen, S. - K. (1997). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.

Chen, S. - K. (2007). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.

Chen, S., Hou, L., & Dodd, B. G.. (1998). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.

Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C.. (2012). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124

Tang, L., Jiang, H., & Chang, H. - H.. (1998). A comparison of two methods of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Nicewander, W. A., Chang, H. S., & Doody, E. N.. (1981). A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.

Cliff, N. A. (1975). Complete orders from incomplete data: Interactive ordering and tailored testing. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 259-302.

Carlson, R. D. (1993). Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.

Carlson, R. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D.. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Case, S. M., & Luecht, R. M.. (1997). Computer assembly of tests so that content reigns supreme. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Drasgow, F., & Chuah, S. C.. (2006). Computer-based testing. In Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (Vol. xiv, pp. 87-100). Washington D.C. USA: American Psychological Association.

Latu, E., & Chapman, E.. (2002). Computerised adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 619-22.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., Hau, K. - T., & Wen, z.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2, 1-15.

Leung, C. K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. T.. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 239-57. presented at the Nov.

Cheng, Y. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing for cognitive diagnosis. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2017). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Chang, Y. - P., Chiu, C. - Y., & Tsai, R. - C.. (2017). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis in Classroom: A Nonparametric Approach. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275-283. presented at the Feb.

Haley, S. M., Siebens, H., Coster, W. J., Tao, W., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Gandek, B., et al.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1033-42. presented at the Aug.

Crabbe, M., & Vandebroek, M.. (2014). Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Random Weights Linear Logistic Test Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 415-431. doi:10.1177/0146621614533987

Albano, A. D., Cai, L., Lease, E. M., & McConnell, S. R.. (2019). Computerized Adaptive Testing in Early Education: Exploring the Impact of Item Position Effects on Ability Estimation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 437-451. doi:10.1111/jedm.12215

Vispoel, W. P.,, & Coffman, D. D.. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29-49.

Croll, P. R. (1982). Computerized adaptive testing system design: Preliminary design considerations (Tech. Report 82-52). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 495).

Huang, H. - Y., Chen, P. - H., & Wang, W. - C.. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Stark, S., & Chernyshenko, O. S.. (2011). Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Ideal Point Model. International Journal of Testing, 11, 231-247. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.561459

Zhou, J., Gierl, M. J., & Cui, Y.. (2007). Computerized attribute-adaptive testing: A new computerized adaptive testing approach incorporating cognitive psychology. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

MCArthur, D. L., & Choppin, B. H.. (1984). Computerized diagnostic testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 391-397.

Vispoel, W. P.,, & Coffman, D. D.. (1994). Computerized-adaptive and self-adapted music-listening tests: Features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.

Chajewski, M., & Harnisher, J.. (2017). Considerations in Performance Evaluations of Computerized Formative Assessments. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., & Wang, X. B.. (2006). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., & Wang, X. B.. (2006). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., Douglas, J., & Guo, F.. (2009). Constraint-weighted a-stratification for computerized adaptive testing with nonstatistical constraints: Balancing measurement efficiency and exposure control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., Douglas, J., & Guo, F.. (2009). Constraint-weighted a-stratification for computerized adaptive testing with nonstatistical constraints: Balancing measurement efficiency and exposure control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49.

Ying Cheng,, Chang, H. - H., Douglas, J., & Fanmin Guo,. (2009). Constraint-Weighted a-Stratification for Computerized Adaptive Testing With Nonstatistical Constraints. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 35-49. doi:10.1177/0013164408322030

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2000). Content balancing in stratified computerized adaptive testing designs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Chen, S. Y., & Lei, P. W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495

Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. W., & Liao, W. H.. (2008). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al.. (2005). Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al.. (2005). Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Grabovsky, I., Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2001). Deriving a stopping rule for sequential adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.