Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M.. (1997). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 using a clinical sample. In Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Symposium and Recent Developments in the use of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Minneapolis MN.

Ban, J. C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). A comparative study of on line pretest item—Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 191-212.

Lau, C. A., & Wang, T.. (1998). Comparing and combining dichotomous and polytomous items with SPRT procedure in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.

Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1994). Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Jiao, H., Liu, J., Haynie, K., Woo, A., & Gorham, J.. (2012). Comparison Between Dichotomous and Polytomous Scoring of Innovative Items in a Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 493-509. doi:10.1177/0013164411422903

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kim-Kang, G., & Weiss, D. J.. (2007). Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Waters, C. J., & Bayroff, A. G.. (1971). A comparison of computer-simulated conventional and branching tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 125-136.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.

Morgan, D. L., Way, W. D., & Augemberg, K. E.. (2006). A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.

Wise, S. L., Plake, S. S., Johnson, P. L., & Roos, S. L.. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.

Wise, S. L. (1999). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Ban, J., Wang, T., & Yi, Q.. (1999). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.

Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.

Yi, Q., Hanson, B., Widiatmo, H., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). Comparison of the SPRT and CMT procedures in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Way, W. D., Lewis, C., & Smith, R. L.. (1995). A comparison of two IRT-based models for computerized mastery testing when item parameter estimates are uncertain. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., Waller, N. G., Slutske, W. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A comparison of two methods for the adaptive administration of the MMPI-2 content scales. In Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Atlanta GA.

De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Jones, D., & Weinman, J.. (1973). Computer-based psychological testing. In . A. Elithorn and D. Jones (Eds.), Artificial and human thinking (pp. 83-93). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Weiss, D. J. (1975). Computerized adaptive ability measurement. Naval Research Reviews, 28, 1-18.

Vispoel, W. P.,, & Wang, T.. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.

Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T.. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.

Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H.. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380-389.

Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H.. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380-389.

Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Watt, M. E.. (1999). Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI-2 in a clinical setting. Psychological Assessment, 11, 369-380.

Waller, N. G. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.

Wood, R. L. (1971). Computerized adaptive sequential testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Shermis, M. D., Stemmer, P. M., & Webb, P. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive skill assessment in a statewide testing program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(1), 49-67.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., Hau, K. - T., & Wen, z.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N., Eignor, D. R., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R., et al.. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wainer, H.,, Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D.. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Jr.,. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70-84.

Weiss, D. J., & Vale, C. D.. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring abilities and other psychological variables. In . J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized personality measurement: A practitioners guide (pp. 325-343). New York: Basic Books.

Hart, D. L., Wang, Y. - C., Stratford, P. W., & Mioduski, J. E.. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for patients with knee inpairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 1113-1124.

Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

Welch, R. E.,, & Frick, T.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing in instructional settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 47-62.

Schwartz, C., Welch, G., Santiago-Kelley, P., Bode, R., & Sun, X.. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing of diabetes impact: a feasibility study of Hispanics and non-Hispanics in an active clinic population. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1503-18. presented at the Nov.

Huang, H. - Y., Chen, P. - H., & Wang, W. - C.. (2012). Computerized Adaptive Testing Using a Class of High-Order Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 689-706. doi:10.1177/0146621612459552

Shih, H. - J., & Wang, W. - C.. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing using the two parameter logistic model with ability-based guessing. In Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Cambridge.

Weiss, D. J., & Gibbons, R. D.. (2007). Computerized adaptive testing with the bifactor model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Grist, S., Rudner, L. M., & Wise,. (1989). Computerized adaptive tests. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, no. 107.

Weiss, D. J. (1975). Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and prospects (Research Report 75-5). In . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Computerized classification testing in more than two categories by using stochastic curtailment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Lau, C. A,, & Wang, T.. (1999). Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.

Lau, C. A., & Wang, T.. (1999). Computerized classification testing under practical constraints with a polytomous model. annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1999, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Wang, W. - C., & Liu, C. - W.. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 114-128. doi:10.1177/0013164410391575

Wang, W. - C., & Huang, S. - Y.. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the One-Parameter Logistic Response Model With Ability-Based Guessing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 925-941. doi:10.1177/0013164410392372

Wildgrube, W. (1980). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 68-77). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborator.

Wildgrube, W. (1982). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF): Empirical approaches. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp.353-359). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wolfe, J. H. (1986). Computerized testing technology. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 4, 71-78.

Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., Yoes, M. E., & Rocklin, T. R.. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.

Wingersky, M. S. (1989). A consideration for variable length adaptive tests (Research Report 89-40). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D.. (2015). Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921

Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Constrained item selection using a stochastically curtailed SPRT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Cheng, Y., Chang, H. - H., & Wang, X. B.. (2006). Constraints-weighted information method for item selection of severely constrained computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.