Export 87 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is E  [Clear All Filters]
1995
Eignor, D. R., & Schaffer, G. A.. (1995). Comparability studies for the GRE CAT General Test and the NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
1994
Diones, R., & Everson, H.. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: Assessment of the future. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4 (2), 1-3.
Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., & Amoss, K. E.. (1994). Establishing the comparability of the NCLEX using CAT with traditional NCLEX examinations. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
Eignor, D. R., Folk, V.G.,, Li, M. - Y., & Stocking, M. L.. (1994). Pinpointing PRAXIS I CAT characteristics through simulation procedures. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
1978
Epstein, K. I., & Knerr, C. S.. (1978). Applications of sequential testing procedures to performance testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ep77249.pdf (1.04 MB)
1977
Hambleton, R. K., & Eignor, D. R.. (1977). Adaptive Testing Applied to Hierarchically Structured Objectives-Based Programs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ha77290.pdf (1.37 MB)
English, R. A., Reckase, M. D., & Patience, W. M.. (1977). Application of tailored testing to achievement measurement. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 158-161.
Epstein, K. I., & Knerr, C. S.. (1977). Applications of sequential testing procedures to performance testing. 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis, MN. USA: University of Minnesota.
1969
Elwood, D. L. (1969). Automation of psychological testing. American Psychologist, 24, 287-289.

Pages