Gorin, J. S. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model: Estimation procedures, population distributions, and item pool characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 433-456.

Gorin, J., Dodd, B. G., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Shieh, Y. Y.. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model: Estimation procedures, population distributions, and item pool characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 533-546.

Gorin, J. S., Dodd, B. G., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Shieh, Y. Y.. (2005). Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Partial Credit Model: Estimation Procedures, Population Distributions, and Item Pool Characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 433-456. doi:10.1177/0146621605280072

Peterson, K. A., L., D. M., & Hjelseth, L.. (2005). Computerizing statewide assessments in Minnesota: A report on the feasibility of converting the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments to a computerized adaptive format. Office of Educational Accountability, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report 02-03.

Moshinsky, A., & Kazin, C.. (2005). Constructing a Computerized Adaptive Test for University Applicants With Disabilities. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 381-405. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1804_3

Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217.

Chen, S. Y., & Lei, P. W.. (2005). Controlling item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 204–217.

Chen, S. - Y., & Lei, P. - W.. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 204-217. doi:10.1177/0146621604271495

McGlohen, M. K., Chang, H. - H., & Wills, J. T.. (2004). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

Andres, P. L., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Ni, P., & Haley, S. M.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing: a strategy for monitoring stroke rehabilitation across settings. Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 33-39. presented at the Spring.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Hauser, C.. (2004). Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Luecht, R. M. (2004). Computer-adaptive testing. In . B. Everett, and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New York: Wiley.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2004). Computer-based test designs with optimal and non-optimal tests for making pass-fail decisions. Research Report, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

Roex, A., & Degryse, J.. (2004). A computerized adaptive knowledge test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 26, 178-83. presented at the Mar.

Gardner, W., Shear, K., Kelleher, K. J., Pajer, K. A., Mammen, O., Buysse, D., & Frank, E.. (2004). Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 13-23.

Segall, D. O. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing. In . Encyclopedia of social measurement. Academic Press.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Jr.,. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In . P. M. Fayers and R. D. Hays (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70-84.

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multiple-Form Structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164. doi:10.1177/0146621604263652

Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., Koppel, N. B., & Pashley, P. J.. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing with multiple-form structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 147-164.

Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. L., & Hahn, J. A.. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2004). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2004). Constraining Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Shadow Tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291. doi:10.3102/10769986029003273

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-359.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2004). The context effects of multidimensional CAT on the accuracy of multidimensional abilities and the item exposure rates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.

Eggen, T. (2004). Contributions to the theory and practice of computerized adaptive testing. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Citogroep.

Segall, D. O. (2003). Calibrating CAT item pools and online pretest items using MCMC methods. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Krass, I. A., & Williams, B.. (2003). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using nonparametric and adjusted marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Cella, D., & Von Roenn, J.. (2003). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.

McBride, J. R. (2003). Can We Assess Pre-K Kids With Computer-Based Tests: STAR Early Literacy Data. In Presentation to the 33rd Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.. San Antonio TX.

Sticha, P. J., & Barber, G.. (2003). CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2003). Cognitive CAT in foreign language assessment. In Proceedings 11th International PEG Conference. Powerful ICT Tools for Learning and Teaching, PEG '03, CD-ROM, 2003.

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

Boyd, A. M., Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (2003). A comparison of exposure control procedures in CAT systems based on different measurement models for testlets using the verbal reasoning section of the MCAT. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

De Beer, M. (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.

Rotou, O., Patsula, L., Steffen, M., & Rizavi, S.. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Dijkers, M. P. (2003). A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, 384-393.

Macdonald, P. L. (2003). Computer-adaptive test for measuring personality factors using item response theory. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 999.

Schneider, R. J., Goff, M., Anderson, S., & Borman, W. C.. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237-246.

Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing. In . R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.): Encyclopaedia of Psychological Assessment. London: Sage.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., Hau, K. - T., & Wen, z.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2, 1-15.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing using the nearest-neighbors criterion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 204-216.

Glas, C. A. W., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing with item cloning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 247-261.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2003). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Ariel, A., Veldkamp, B., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2003). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2003). Controlling item exposure and item eligibility in computerized adaptive testing. In .

Samejima, F. (2003). Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T., Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2002). Comparing three item selection approaches for computerized adaptive testing with content balancing requirement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Smith, R. L., & Lewis, C.. (2002). A comparison of computer mastery models when pool characteristics vary. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Hockemeyer, C. (2002). A comparison of non-deterministic procedures for the adaptive assessment of knowledge. Psychologische Beitrge, 44, 495-503.

Jodoin, M., Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2002). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.