Export 158 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is F  [Clear All Filters]
Journal Article
Wang, C., Fan, Z., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J. A.. (2013). A Semiparametric Model for Jointly Analyzing Response Times and Accuracy in Computerized Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 381-417. doi:10.3102/1076998612461831
Feng, X. (2003). Statistical detection and estimation of differential item functioning in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2736.
Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007
Fujimori, S. (1995). A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.
Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015
PDF icon gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)
PDF icon gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)
Finkelman, M. D. (2008). On using stochastic curtailment to shorten the SPRT in sequential mastery testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 442.
Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Riley, B., & Smits, N.. (2015). Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 389-405. doi:10.1177/0146621615569504
Finkelman, M. D. (2010). Variations on Stochastic Curtailment in Sequential Mastery Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 27-45. doi:10.1177/0146621609336113
Miscellaneous
Finkelman, M. (2003). An adaptation of stochastic curtailment to truncate Wald’s SPRT in computerized adaptive testing. presented at the Steptember, 2003, Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
PDF icon Finkelman report.pdf (212.93 KB)
Friedman, D., Steinberg, A,, & Ree, M. J.. (1981). Adaptive testing without a computer. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, Nov 1981, 11, 74-75 (Ms. No. 2350). AFHRL Technical Report 80-66.
Ferguson, R. L., & Hsu, T.. (1971). The application of item generators for individualizing mathematics testing and instruction (Report 1971/14). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.
Frick, T. W. (1989). A comparison of an expert systems approach to computerized adaptive testing and an IRT model. Unpublished manuscript (submitted to American Educational Research Journal).
Ferguson, R. L. (1970). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
Ferguson, R. L. (1971). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh R and D Center.
Ferguson, R. L. (1969). Computer-assisted criterion-referenced measurement (Working Paper No 49). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning and Research Development Center. (ERIC No. ED 037 089).
Bayroff, A. G., Ross, R. M., & Fischl, M. A.. (1974). Development of a programmed testing system (Technical Paper 259). Arlington VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. NTIS No. AD A001534).
Lee, Y. H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. D.. (2002). A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Available from http://www3. tat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/c-2002-11.pdf.
PDF icon lee02-01.pdf (186.93 KB)

Pages