Segall, D. O. (1997). The effects of motivation on equating adaptive and conventional tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331-354.

Segall, D. O. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing. In . Encyclopedia of social measurement. Academic Press.

Segall, D. O. (2010). Principles of Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 57-76). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Segall, D. O. (1988). A procedure for scoring incomplete adaptive tests in high stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Segall, D. O. (2003). An adaptive exposure control algorithm for computerized adaptive testing using a sharing item response theory model. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., & Hetter, D. H.. (1997). Item pool development and evaluation. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 117-130). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Segall, D. O. (1995). The effects of item compromise on computerized adaptive test scores. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL.

Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 53-73). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Segall, D. O. (1994). CAT-GATB simulation studies. San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331-354.

Seguin, S. P. (1976). An exploratory studyof the efficiency of the flexilevel testing procedure. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Sekula-Wacura, R. (2000). A review of CAT review. Popular Measurement, 3, 47-49.

Seo, D. Gi. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing

Seo, D. Gi, & Weiss, D. J.. (2015). Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 954-978. doi:10.1177/0013164415575147

Sheehan, K., & Lewis, C.. (1992). Computerized Mastery Testing With Nonequivalent Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 65-76.

Sheehan, K.,, & Lewis, C.. (1992). Computerized mastery testing with nonequivalent testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 65-76.

Shen, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, S., & Bradshaw, L.. (2017). Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Detect Students’ Misconceptions: Exploration of Item Selection. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Sheng, Y., Flournoy, N., & Osterlind, S. J.. (2007). Up-and-down procedures for approximating optimal designs using person-response functions. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Sheng, Y., & Sheng, Z.. (2009). Item selection with biased-coin up-and-down designs. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Shermis, M. D., Stemmer, P. M., & Webb, P. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive skill assessment in a statewide testing program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(1), 49-67.

Shermis, M. D., & et. al.,. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for reading assessment and diagnostic assessment. Journal of Developmental Education, 18-20.

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., & Bublitz, S.. (1997). Controlling test and computer anxiety: Test performance under CAT and SAT conditions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., Brown, M., & Lillig, C.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. (ERIC No. ED414536).

Shermis, M. D. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. In .

Shermis, M. D. (1986). A computer-adaptive placement test for college mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Shi, Y. (2017). Item Response Time on Task Effect in CAT. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.

Shi, Y. (2017). Response Time and Response Accuracy in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yYP01bzGrKvJnfLwepcAoQQ2F4TdSvZ2

Shiba, S., Noguchi, H., & Haebra, T.. (1978). A stratified adaptive test of verbal ability. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 229-238.

Shih, H. - J., & Wang, W. - C.. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing using the two parameter logistic model with ability-based guessing. In Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Cambridge.

Shudong Wang,, Hong Jiao,, Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J.. (2008). Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24. doi:10.1177/0013164407305592

Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu.,. (2001). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in a realistic second-order equitable CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Shyu, C. - Y., Fan, M., Thompson, T,, & Hsu, Y.. (2002). An investigation of procedures for estimating error indexes in proficiency estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Riley, B., & Smits, N.. (2015). Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 389-405. doi:10.1177/0146621615569504

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Bartroff, J., & Thompson, N. A.. (2015). Stochastic Curtailment in Adaptive Mastery Testing: Improving the Efficiency of Confidence Interval–Based Stopping Rules. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 278-292. doi:10.1177/0146621614561314

Siebens, H., Andres, P. L., Pengsheng, N., Coster, W. J., & Haley, S. M.. (2005). Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 741-8. presented at the Oct.

Siegmund, D. (1985). Sequential analysis: Tests and confidence intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Sijtsma, K. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65-94.

Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. J.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule of Non-Adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17, 28-43.

Simms, L. J. (2002). DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE VERSION OF THE SCHEDULE FOR NONADAPTIVE AND ADAPTIVE PERSONALITY. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa.

Simms, L. J. (2003). Development, reliability, and validity of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63, 3485.

Simms, L. (2001). Testing a computerized adaptive personality inventory using simulated response data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco CA.

Simms, L. J.,, & Clark, L. A.. (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive testing version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 28-43.

Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H.. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380-389.

Singh, J. (1993). Some initial experiments with adaptive survey designs for structured questionnaires. In Paper presented at the New Methods and Applications in Consumer Research Conference. Cambridge MA.

Singh, J., Howell, R. D., & Rhoads, G. K.. (1990). Adaptive designs for Likert-type data: An approach for implementing marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 304-321.

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Choi, S. W., & Kim, D. - I.. (2015). Assessing Individual-Level Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 80–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12064

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Whitaker, M., Kim, D. - I., Zhang, L., & Choi, S. W.. (2014). Determining the Overall Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 419–440. doi:10.1111/jedm.12052

Sireci, S. G., Wainer, H.,, & Thissen, D.. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237-247.

Sireci, S. G., & Clauser, B. E.. (2001). Practical issues in setting standards on computerized adaptive tests. In Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 355-369). Mahwah, N.J. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Slater, S. C., & Schaffer, G. A.. (1996). Computing scores for incomplete GRE General computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.

Slutske, W. S., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N.. (1988). A real-data simulation of adaptive MMPI administration. In Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on recent developments in the use of the MMPI. St. Petersburg FL.

Smith, R. L., Wang, M. M., Wingersky, M., & Zhao, C.. (2001). Monitoring items for changes in performance in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle, Washington.

Smith, R. W., Plake, B. S., & de Ayala, R. J.. (2001). Item and passage selection algorithm simulations for a computerized adaptive version of the verbal section of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). MCAT Monograph Series.

Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1998). Expected losses for individuals in Computerized Mastery Testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego.

Smith, R. L., Rizavi, S., Paez, R., Damiano, M., & Herbert, E.. (2003). Maintaining scale in computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Smith, R. W. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.

Smith, R., & Lewis, C.. (1997). Incorporating decision consistency into Bayesian sequential testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.

Smith, R. L., Rizavi, S., Paez, R., & Rotou, O.. (2002). Updated item parameter estimates using sparse CAT data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.