Export 276 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.
. (1994). Le testing adaptatif [Adaptive testing]. In . D. R. Bertrand and J.G. Blais (Eds) : Les théories modernes de la mesure [Modern theories of measurement]. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
. (2002). ra02-02.pdf (190.86 KB)L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).
. (1994). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.
. (1978). Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research, 18, 125-36. presented at the Feb.
. (2009). Maintaining scale in computer adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). sm03-01.pdf (366.57 KB)A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.
. (2003). ar03-03.pdf (206.25 KB)Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research, 16, 109-119, .
. (2007). Methods for item set selection in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). lu03-02.pdf (441.94 KB) . (1996).
. (1998).
Monte carlo results from a computer program for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 2). Los Angeles CA: University of California, Department of Psychology.
. (1976). A monte carlo study of the feasibility of on-the-fly assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Operational characteristics of a one-parameter tailored testing procedure. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, August 1980, 10, 66 (Ms No. 2104).
. (1980). Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1979). The Optimal Item Pool Design in Multistage Computerized Adaptive Tests With the p-Optimality Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 955-974. doi:10.1177/0013164419901292
. (2020). Patient-reported outcomes measurement and computerized adaptive testing: An application of post-hoc simulation to a diagnostic screening instrument. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07immekus.pdf (202.27 KB) . (2007).
. (2007).
. (2007).
Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (1991). A plan for scaling the computerized adaptive Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.
. (1984). a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a priori, adaptive correction for bias, and adaptive integration interval. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(2).
. (2009). Pour une évaluation sur mesure des étudiants : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif. In Commnication présentée à l’intérieur de la 23e session d’études de l’Association pour le dévelopement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation. ADMÉÉ.
. (2001). Pour une évaluation sur mesure pour chaque étudiant : défis et enjeux du testing adaptatif par ordinateur en éducation [Tailored testing for each student : Principles and stakes of computerized adaptive testing in education]. In Presented at the 23th Study Session of the ADMÉÉ. Québec: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation (ADMÉÉ).
. (2001). Practical considerations about expected a posteriori estimation in adaptive testing: Adaptive a prior, adaptive corrections for bias, adaptive integration interval. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Objective Measurement Workshops-XI. New Orleans, LA.
. (2002). ra02-01.pdf (99.92 KB)Predictive validity of computerized adaptive testing in a military training environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1984). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
. (1982). Principes et enjeux du testing adaptatif : de la loi des petits nombres à la loi des grands nombres. In Communication présentée à l’intérieur du 69e congrès de l’Association canadienne française pour l’avancement de la science. Acfas.
. (2001). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".
. (1979). A procedure for decision making using tailored testing. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 237-254). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
. (1983). Reckase '83.pdf (474.81 KB) . (1977).
Procedures for computerized testing. In Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the National Conference on the Use of On-Line Computers in Psychology. St. Louis MO.
. (1976). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.
. (2009). . (2005).
. (1996).
Psychometric and psychological effects of item selection and review on computerized testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808.
. (2003). Psychometric and Psychological Effects of Item Selection and Review on Computerized Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 791-808. doi:10.1177/0013164403251282
. (2003). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicolgia, 21, 157-173.
. (2000). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.
. (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39-46.
. (2007). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.
. (1994). Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: The GAIN Substance Problem Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 48-65.
. (2007). Reproduction of total test score through the use of sequential programmed tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 183-187.
. (1968). . (2001).
The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
. (1997). Routing Strategies and Optimizing Design for Multistage Testing in International Large-Scale Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 192-213. doi:10.1111/jedm.12206
. (2019). Routing Strategies and Optimizing Design for Multistage Testing in International Large-Scale Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56, 192-213. doi:10.1111/jedm.12206
. (2019). The selection of items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1984). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
. (2000). . (1994).
Self-adapted testing: A performance improving variation of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315-319.
. (1987). Self-adapted testing: Improving performance by modifying tests instead of examinees. Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 10(1), 83-104.
. (1997). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 85-95.
. (1972). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. College Entrance Examination Board Research and Development Report (RDR 69-70, No 3", and Educational Testing Service RB-70-31). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1970). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.
. (2004).