Export 2297 results:
2008
Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12
PDF icon Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits.pdf (518.72 KB)
Chen, S. - Y., Lei, P. W., & Liao, W. H.. (2008). Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 471-92. presented at the Nov.
Guyer, R. D. (2008). Effect of early misfit in computerized adaptive testing on the recovery of theta. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN.
PDF icon gu08001.pdf (1003.26 KB)
PDF icon ICAT- An Adaptive Testing Procedure for the Identification of Idiosyncratic Knowledge Patterns.pdf (322.62 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.
Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.
Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O.. (2008). Local Dependence in an Operational CAT: Diagnosis and Implications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 201–223. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00061.x
Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A monte carlo approach for adaptive testing with content constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081
Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach for Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081
Belov, D. I., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach to the Design, Assembly, and Evaluation of Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 119-137. doi:10.1177/0146621606297308
Newton, D. W., Boyle, M., & Catizone, C. A.. (2008). The NAPLEX: evolution, purpose, scope, and educational implications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 33. presented at the Apr 15.
Chen, S. - Y., & Doong, S. H.. (2008). Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 75-91. presented at the May.
Huh, S. (2008). Preparing the implementation of computerized adaptive testing for high-stakes examinations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.
PDF icon ba08618.pdf (266.26 KB)
Qing Yi,, Jinming Zhang,, & Chang, H. - H.. (2008). Severity of Organized Item Theft in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Simulation Study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 543-558. doi:10.1177/0146621607311336
van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Some new developments in adaptive testing technology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 3-11.
PDF icon Some New Developments in Adaptive Testing.pdf (544.66 KB)
Lee, Y. - H., Ip, E. H., & Fuh, C. - D.. (2008). A Strategy for Controlling Item Exposure in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 215-232. doi:10.1177/0013164407307007
Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2008). To Weight Or Not To Weight? Balancing Influence Of Initial Items In Adaptive Testing. Psychometrica, 73(3), 441-450. doi:10.1007/S11336-007-9047-7
Walter, O. B., & Holling, H.. (2008). Transitioning from fixed-length questionnaires to computer-adaptive versions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie \ Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 22–28.
PDF icon Transitioning from Fixed-Length Questionnaires to Computer-Adaptive Versions.pdf (214.47 KB)
PDF icon gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)
van der Linden, W. J. (2008). Using response times for item selection in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 5–20.
Finkelman, M. D. (2008). On using stochastic curtailment to shorten the SPRT in sequential mastery testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 442.
2009
Luecht, R. M. (2009). Adaptive computer-based tasks under an assessment engineering paradigm. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09luecht.pdf (288.75 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G. (2009). Adaptive item calibration: A process for estimating item parameters within a computerized adaptive test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09kingsbury.pdf (285.12 KB)
Karino, C. A., Costa, D. R., & Laros, J. A.. (2009). Adequacy of an item pool measuring proficiency in English language to implement a CAT procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09karino.pdf (159.63 KB)
Gafni, N., Cohen, Y., Roded, K., Baumer, M., & Moshinsky, A.. (2009). Applications of CAT in admissions to higher education in Israel: Twenty-two years of experience. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09gafni.pdf (325.12 KB)
Padaki, M., & Natarajan, V.. (2009). An approach to implementing adaptive testing using item response theory both offline and online. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09natarajan.pdf (171.6 KB)
Baumer, M., Roded, K., & Gafni, N.. (2009). Assessing the equivalence of Internet-based vs. paper-and-pencil psychometric tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09roded.pdf (141.5 KB)
Makransky, G. (2009). An automatic online calibration design in adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09makransky.pdf (364.64 KB)
Swartz, R. J., & Choi, S. W.. (2009). A burdened CAT: Incorporating response burden with maximum Fisher's information for item selection. In . In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09swartz.pdf (373.74 KB)
File Recalibrating Drifting Items in CAT MS.docx (543.3 KB)
Diao, Q., & Reckase, M.. (2009). Comparison of ability estimation and item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09diao.pdf (341.8 KB)
Chen, P. H. (2009). Comparison of adaptive Bayesian estimation and weighted Bayesian estimation in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09chen.pdf (307.42 KB)
Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801
Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.
PDF icon ba09313.pdf (93.66 KB)
Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09costa.pdf (530.39 KB)
Thissen-Roe, A. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing by mutual information and multiple imputations. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09thissen-roe.pdf (178.47 KB)
Cheng, Y. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing for cognitive diagnosis. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09cheng.pdf (313.85 KB)
Shih, H. - J., & Wang, W. - C.. (2009). Computerized adaptive testing using the two parameter logistic model with ability-based guessing. In Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Cambridge.

Pages