Bayroff, A. G., Ross, R. M., & Fischl, M. A.. (1974). Development of a programmed testing system (Technical Paper 259). Arlington VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. NTIS No. AD A001534).

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). Evaluation plan for the computerized adaptive vocational aptitude battery (Research Report 82-1).

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Rehab-Group-Inc.,. (1980). Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.

Reckase, M. D. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive testing paradigm: Validation in technical training. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (I).

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive training paradigm: Hierarchical concept structures. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (II).

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Reckase, M. D. (1989). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.

Rudner, L. M. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Raîche, G.. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Armstrong, R. D., & Roussos, L.. (2003). A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.

Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., Reynolds, T. J., & McCormick, D. J.. (1976). Monte carlo results from a computer program for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 2). Los Angeles CA: University of California, Department of Psychology.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1982). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".

Rijn, P. W. van,, Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2000). A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1970). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. College Entrance Examination Board Research and Development Report (RDR 69-70, No 3", and Educational Testing Service RB-70-31). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2001). STAR Early Literacy Computer-Adaptive Diagnostic Assessment: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2002). STAR Math 2 Computer-Adaptive Math Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2000). STAR Reading 2 Computer-Adaptive Reading Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). A successful application of latent trait theory to tailored achievement testing (Research Report 80-1). University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). The use of the sequential probability ratio test in making grade classifications in conjunction with tailored testing (Research Report 81-4). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology.

Rebollo, P., Castejon, I., Cuervo, J., Villa, G., Garcia-Cueto, E., Diaz-Cuervo, H., et al.. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1981). A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.

Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.