Bibliography | Page 5 | IACAT

Search

Show only items where

Author

Type

Term

Year

Keyword

Export 425 results:

Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is W [Clear All Filters]

Journal Article

Walker, C. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Ackerman, T. A.. (2001). An examination of conditioning variables used in computer adaptive testing for DIF analyses. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 3-16.

Wise, S. L., Finney, S. J.,, Enders, C. K., Freeman, S. A., & Severance, D. D.. (1999). Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 185-198.

Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022

Huebner, A., Finkelman, M. D., & Weissman, A.. (2018). Factors Affecting the Classification Accuracy and Average Length of a Variable-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Test. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(1), 1-14. doi:10.7333/1802-060101

Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., J.. (2003). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: a re-analysis of three clinical studies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R.,, Morley, M. E.,, Wagner, M. E.,, Bennett R. E.,, & Revuelta, J.. (2003). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2 (3).

be03-03.pdf (436.24 KB)

Weissman, A. (2006). A Feedback Control Strategy for Enhancing Item Selection Efficiency in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 84-99. doi:10.1177/0146621605282774

Thompson, N. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (2011). A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 16.

Thompson-Weissv16n1.pdf (191.79 KB)

Becker, J., Fliege, H., Kocalevent, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Rose, M., Walter, O. B., & Klapp, B. F.. (2008). Functioning and validity of a computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety (A CAT). Depression and Anxiety, 25, E182-E194.

DeWitt, L. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1976). Hardware and software evolution of an adaptive ability measurement system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 104-107.

Tai, M. Him, Cooperman, A. W., DeWeese, J. N., & Weiss, D. J.. (2023). How Do Trait Change Patterns Affect the Performance of Adaptive Measurement of Change?. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(3), 32-58. doi:10.7333/2307-1003032

Wang, S., Lin, H., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2016). Hybrid Computerized Adaptive Testing: From Group Sequential Design to Fully Sequential Design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 45–62. doi:10.1111/jedm.12100

Wang, W. - C., & Chen, P. - H.. (2004). Implementation and Measurement Efficiency of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 295-316. doi:10.1177/0146621604265938

Wang, C. (2014). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419

Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.

v06n4p473.pdf (2.74 MB)

Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., & Wang, T.. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Wu, M. - L., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2008). Investigating item exposure control on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 1-32.

Leroux, A. J., J. Waid-Ebbs, K., Wen, P. - S., Helmer, D. A., Graham, D. P., O’Connor, M. K., & Ray, K.. (2019). An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 624-638. doi:10.1177/0146621618824856

Leroux, A. J., J. Waid-Ebbs, K., Wen, P. - S., Helmer, D. A., Graham, D. P., O’Connor, M. K., & Ray, K.. (2019). An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 624-638. doi:10.1177/0146621618824856

Ponsoda, V., Wise, S. L., Olea, J., & Revuelta, J.. (1997). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 210-221.

Wang, C., Chen, P., & Jiang, S.. (2020). Item Calibration Methods With Multiple Subscale Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 3-28. doi:10.1111/jedm.12241

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185-201.

Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G.. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.

Wainer, H.,. (1983). On item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: The coming technical revolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28, 9-16.

Ware, J. E., Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., & Bjorner, J. B.. (2005). Item response theory in computer adaptive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 50, 71-78.

Chen, C. - W., Wang, W. - C., Chiu, M. Ming, & Ro, S.. (2020). Item Selection and Exposure Control Methods for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multidimensional Ranking Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57, 343-369. doi:10.1111/jedm.12252

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Hambleton, R. K., Montpetit, K., et al.. (2009). Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: Illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 359-370. presented at the Apr.

Weiss, D. J., & Von Minden, S.. (2011). Measuring Individual Growth With Conventional and Adaptive Tests. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 2(1), 80-101.

Measuring Individual Change -- JMM.PDF (934.54 KB)

Wise, S. L., & G. Kingsbury, G.. (2016). Modeling Student Test-Taking Motivation in the Context of an Adaptive Achievement Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 86–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12102

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A monte carlo approach for adaptive testing with content constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Belov, D. I., Armstrong, R. D., & Weissman, A.. (2008). A Monte Carlo Approach for Adaptive Testing With Content Constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 431-446. doi:10.1177/0146621607309081

Schmitt, T. A., Sass, D. A., Sullivan, J. R., & Walker, C. M.. (2010). A Monte Carlo Simulation Investigating the Validity and Reliability of Ability Estimation in Item Response Theory with Speeded Computer Adaptive Tests. International Journal of Testing, 10, 230-261. doi:10.1080/15305058.2010.488098

Hsu, C. - L., & Wang, W. - C.. (2019). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Non-Compensatory Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 464-480. doi:10.1177/0146621618800280

Weissman, A. (2007). Mutual Information Item Selection in Adaptive Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 41-58. doi:10.1177/0013164406288164

Wang, C. (2013). Mutual Information Item Selection Method in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Short Test Length. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 1017-1035. doi:10.1177/0013164413498256

Wandall, J. (2011). National Tests in Denmark – CAT as a Pedagogic Tool. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1).

Beeman, P. B., & Waterhouse, J. K.. (2001). NCLEX-RN performance: predicting success on the computerized examination. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 158-165. presented at the Jul-Aug.

Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.

Wiberg, M. (2003). An optimal design approach to criterion-referenced computerized testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 97-100.

Wolfe, J. H. (1981). Optimal item difficulty for the three-parameter normal ogive model. Psychometrika, 46, 461-464.

Bradlow, E. T., & Weiss, R. E.. (2001). Outlier measures and norming methods for computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 85-104.

Wang, L. - S., & Li., C. - S.. (2001). Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2 (4).

Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.

Wainer, H.,. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157-187.

Wang, S.,, & Wang, T.. (2001). Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.

Wang, S.,, & Wang, T.. (2001). Precision of Warm’s weighted likelihood estimation of ability for a polytomous model in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 317-331.

Wang, T., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1998). Properties of ability estimation methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 109-135.

Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 17-27.

Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., & et. al.,. (1989). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al.. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.

Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720

Wang, W. - C., Liu, C. - W., & Wu, S. - L.. (2013). The Random-Threshold Generalized Unfolding Model and Its Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 179-200. doi:10.1177/0146621612469720

Wang, T., Hanson, B. H., & Lau, C. - M. H.. (1999). Reducing bias in CAT trait estimation: A comparison of approaches. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 263-278.

Chien, T. W., Wu, H. M., Wang, W. - C., Castillo, R. V., & Chou, W.. (2009). Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 39.

Chien, T. W., Wu, H. M., Wang, W. - C., Castillo, R. V., & Chou, W.. (2009). Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 39.

Moreno, K. E., Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., & Weiss, D. J.. (1984). Relationship Between Corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 155-163.

v08n2p155.pdf (594.04 KB)

Pages