Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Cudeck, R. (1985). A structural comparison of conventional and adaptive versions of the ASVAB. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 305-322.
PDF icon v3n1p065.pdf (543.67 KB)
Culbertson, M. J. (2016). Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment: The State of the Field. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 3-21. doi:10.1177/0146621615590401
Curran, L. T., & Wise, L. L.. (1994). Evaluation and implementation of CAT-ASVAB. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles.
D
Dai, B., Zhang, M., & Li, G.. (2016). Exploration of Item Selection in Dual-Purpose Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing: Based on the RRUM. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 625-640. doi:10.1177/0146621616666008
Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In Paper presented at an Educational Testing Service-sponsored colloquium entitled “Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments. ” Philadelphia PA.
Davey, T., & Thomas, L.. (1996). Constructing adaptive tests to parallel conventional programs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.
Davey, T., & Nering, M. L.. (1998). Evaluating and insuring measurement precision in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Davey, T., & Pitoniak, M. J.. (2006). Designing computerized adaptive tests. In . S.M. Downing and T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davey, T., Pommerich, M., & Thompson, D. T.. (1999). Pretesting alongside an operational CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Davey, T., & Fan, M.. (2000). Specific information item selection for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
Davey, T., & Nering, M.. (2002). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In . C. N. Mills, M. T. Potenza, and J. J. Fremer (Eds.), Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments (pp. 165-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G.. (1995). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Davey, T., Nering, M., & Thompson, T.. (1997). Realistic simulation procedures for item response data. In In T. Miller (Chair), High-dimensional simulation of item response data for CAT research. Psychometric Society. Gatlinburg TN.
David, L. A., & Lewis, C.. (1996). Person-fit indices and their role in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with polytomously scored items. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 458.
Davis, L. L. (2004). Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0146621604264133
PDF icon da02-01.pdf (1.79 MB)
Davis, L. L., Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., Chiang, C., & Fitzpatrick, S.. (2000). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
PDF icon daxx-01.pdf (652.37 KB)
Davis, L. L. (2003). Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon da03-01.pdf (619.88 KB)
de Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R.. (1987). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Washington DC.
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.
de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.
De Ayals, R. J. (1992). The Nominal Response Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 327-343.
PDF icon v16n4p327.pdf (1.45 MB)
De Beer, M. (2007). Use of CAT in dynamic testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat2007debeer.pdf (133.49 KB)
PDF icon debe03-02.pdf (562.16 KB)
De Beer, M. (2000). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerised adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished D. Litt et Phil dissertation. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
De Beer, M. (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.
PDF icon debe03-01.pdf (390.1 KB)
De Beer, M. (2002). Utility of Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT) scores in predicting academic performance of bridging students: A comparison with other predictors. In Paper presented at the 5th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Congress. Pretoria, South Africa.
De Champlain, A. F. (2017). Using Automated Item Generation in a Large-scale Medical Licensure Exam Program: Lessons Learned. In 2017 IACAT Conference. presented at the 08.2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=14N8hUc8qexAy5W_94TykEDABGVIJHG1h
De la Torre, R., & Vispoel, W. P.. (1991). The development and evaluation of a computerized adaptive testing system. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon de74-1.pdf (2.67 MB)
DeMars, C. E. (2022). The (non)Impact of Misfitting Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 9(2). doi:10.7333/2211-0902008
Deng, H., & Ansley, T.. (2003). To stratify or not: An investigation of CAT item selection procedures under practical constraints. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon de03-01.pdf (185.22 KB)
Deng, H., Ansley, T., & Chang, H. - H.. (2010). Stratified and Maximum Information Item Selection Procedures in Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 202–226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00109.x
Deng, H., & Chang, H. - H.. (2001). a-stratified computerized adaptive testing with unequal item exposure across strata. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Desmarais, M. C., & Pu, X.. (2005). A Bayesian student model without hidden nodes and its comparison with item response theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 291-323.

Pages