Export 79 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is P [Clear All Filters]
Measurement efficiency for fixed-precision multidimensional computerized adaptive tests: Comparing health measurement and educational testing using example banks. Applied Psychological Measurement.
. (In Press). measefficiency_MCAT.pdf (1.1 MB)Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 68-83. doi:10.1177/0146621618765719
. (2019). Item usage in a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) measuring health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2909–2918. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1624-3
. (2017). itemusage_QLR.pdf (641.22 KB)Measuring patient-reported outcomes adaptively: Multidimensionality matters!. Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0146621617733954
. (2018). PRO_multidimmatters_APM.pdf (894.8 KB)An approach to implementing adaptive testing using item response theory both offline and online. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09natarajan.pdf (171.6 KB)Recent trends in comparability studies (No. 05-05). PEM Research Report 05-05. presented at the August, 2005, Pearson.
. (2005). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S21-S39. presented at the Nov.
. (2002). A “Rearrangement Procedure†For Scoring Adaptive Tests with Review Options. International Journal of Testing, 7, 387-407. doi:10.1080/15305050701632262
. (2007). A rearrangement procedure for administering adaptive tests when review options are permitted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
. (2001). A “rearrangement procedure” for administering adaptive tests with review options. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). pa02-01.pdf (409.97 KB)A new delivery system for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07park.pdf (247.11 KB)The Development of MST Test Information for the Prediction of Test Performances. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 570-586. doi:10.1177/0013164416662960
. (2017). Enhancing Pool Utilization in Constructing the Multistage Test Using Mixed-Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 268-280. doi:10.1177/0146621613515545
. (2014). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.
. (1990). Computerized testing – Issues and applications (Mini-course manual). In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal.
. (1999). Item exposure control in computer-adaptive testing: The use of freezing to augment stratification. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 40, 28-52.
. (2000). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In . In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer (in press).
. (2002). Test development exposure control for adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
. (1998). Sufficient simplicity or comprehensive complexity? A comparison of probabilitic and stratification methods of exposure control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). Item development and pretesting in a computer-based testing environment. In Paper presented at the Educational Testing Service Sponsored Colloquium on Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments. Philadelphia.
. (1998). Innovative Items for Computerized Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 215-230). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2010). Nearest neighbors, simple strata, and probabilistic parameters: An empirical comparison of methods for item exposure control in CATs. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (2001). Item exposure in adaptive tests: An empirical investigation of control strategies. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
. (1999). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07parshall.pdf (148.23 KB)An overview of the LSAC CAT research agenda. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). The D-optimality item selection criterion in the early stage of CAT: A study with the graded response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 88-110.
. (2008). Test design optimization in CAT early stage with the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 213-232.
. (2007). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.
. (2002). Performance of the Sympson-Hetter exposure control algorithm with a polytomous item bank. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). An evaluation of the sequential method of testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
. (1962). Operational characteristics of a one-parameter tailored testing procedure. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, August 1980, 10, 66 (Ms No. 2104).
. (1980). Effects of program parameters and item pool characteristics on the bias of a three-parameter tailored testing procedure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Boston MA, U.
. (1980). . (1990).
Operational characteristics of a Rasch model tailored testing procedure when program parameters and item pool attributes are varied. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco.
. (1979). Description of components in tailored testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 153-157.
. (1977). Detecting test-takers who have memorized items in computerized-adaptive testing and muti-stage testing: A comparison. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (2000). A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and multistage testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 60, 5829.
. (2000). A comparative study of ability estimates from computer-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal Canada.
. (1999). Maintaining item and test security in a CAT environment: A simulation study. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL).
. (1997). A comparison of computerized-adaptive testing and multi-stage testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
. (1999). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727
. (2013). Applying Bayesian item selection approaches to adaptive tests using polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 1-20.
. (2006). Estimating the Standard Error of the Maximum Likelihood Ability Estimator in Adaptive Testing Using the Posterior-Weighted Test Information Function. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 958-975. doi:10.1177/0013164407301544
. (2007). Adaptive Branching in a Multi-Content Achievement Test. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). pe77271.pdf (941.73 KB)Development of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning dimension. Quality of Life Research , 20, 479-490.
. (2010). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: basic developments and evaluations. Quality of Life Research, 15, 315-29. presented at the Apr.
. (2006). Computerizing statewide assessments in Minnesota: A report on the feasibility of converting the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments to a computerized adaptive format. Office of Educational Accountability, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.
. (2005). An Automated Decision System for Computer Adaptive Testing Using Genetic Algorithms. In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2008. SNPD'08. Ninth ACIS International Conference on (pp. 655–660). IEEE.
. (2008). . (2011).
Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1980). pi79-02.pdf (2.27 MB)A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1978). pi78-01.pdf (1.91 MB)Reduction of Test Bias by Adaptive Testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1977). pi77128.pdf (734.76 KB)[Item Selection Strategies of Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Graded Response Model.]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 461-467.
. (2006). Differences between self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 235-247.
. (2001). A learning environment for english for academic purposes based on adaptive tests and task-based systems. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. . Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
. (2004). Goncalves.pdf (152.09 KB)Testlet-based Designs for Computer-Based Testing in a Certification and Licensure Setting. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA Technical Report.
. (2000). Longitudinal Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 447–468. doi:10.1111/jedm.12028
. (2013). Methodological determination of the PEST (parameter estimation by sequential testing) procedure. Perception and psychophysics, 3, 285-289.
. (1968). The Effect of Using Item Parameters Calibrated from Paper Administrations in Computer Adaptive Test Administrations. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5.
. (2007). Calibrating CAT pools and online pretest items using marginal maximum likelihood methods. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2003). po03-01.pdf (283.64 KB)