Export 215 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is G  [Clear All Filters]
Report
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.
Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). Efficiency of an adaptive inter-subtest branching strategy in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 79-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon gi79-06.pdf (2.72 MB)
Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (No. ETS Research Report 98-38). presented at the August, 1998, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Services.
Miscellaneous
de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1977). A two-stage testing procedure (Memorandum 403-77). University of Leyden, The Netherlands, Educational Research Center.
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Glas, C. A. W. (1998). Quality control of on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Thomas, T. J., & Green, B. F.. (1989). Item-presentation controls for computerized adaptive testing: Content-balancing versus min-CAT (Research Report 89-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Laboratory.
PDF icon be77-07.pdf (1.97 MB)
Pine, S. M., Church, A. T., Gialluca, K. A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Effects of computerized adaptive testing on Black and White students (Research Report 79-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon pi79-02.pdf (2.27 MB)
Grist, S., Rudner, L. M., & Wise,. (1989). Computerized adaptive tests. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, no. 107.
Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1977). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.
Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L.. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.
Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L.. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.
Geranpayeh, A. (2001). CB BULATS: Examining the reliability of a computer based test using test-retest method. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, Issue 5, July 2001, pp.
PDF icon ge01-01.pdf (455.94 KB)
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (1998). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Greaud, V. A.,, & Green, B. F.. (1984). Analysis of speeded test data from experimental CAT system. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
Greaud, V. A.,, & Green, B. F.. (1984). Analysis of speeded test data from experimental CAT system. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
Allred, L. A., & Green, B. F.. (1984). Analysis of experimental CAT ASVAB data. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
Glas, C. A. W., & Vos, H. J.. (1998). Adaptive mastery testing using the Rasch model and Bayesian sequential decision theory (Research Report 98-15). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Glas, C. A. W., & Vos, H. J.. (2000). Adaptive mastery testing using a multidimensional IRT model and Bayesian sequential decision theory (Research Report 00-06). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
Journal Article
PDF icon gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)
PDF icon gi08361.pdf (106.3 KB)
Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H.. (2018). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z.. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436. presented at the Sep.
Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A.. (2004). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.
PDF icon ge07-01.pdf (319.09 KB)
Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.
Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B.. (2011). Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing: Effects of Item Pool Size, Test Termination Criterion, and Number of Cutscores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 1006-1022. doi:10.1177/0013164410393956
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2010). A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 1-17. presented at the Dec 1.
Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G.. (2011). A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 37-53. doi:10.1177/0013164410387338
PDF icon ga02812.pdf (131.16 KB)
PDF icon PRO_multidimmatters_APM.pdf (894.8 KB)
Glas, C. A. W., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2010). Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 603-26.

Pages