Nandakumar, R., Banks, J. C., & Roussos, L. A.. (2006). Kernel-smoothed DIF detection procedure for computerized adaptive tests (Computerized testing report 00-08). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.

McKinley, R. L.,, & Reckase, M. D.. (1981). A comparison of a Bayesian and a maximum likelihood tailored testing procedure. Research Report 81-2. Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (2001). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Rebollo, P., Castejon, I., Cuervo, J., Villa, G., Garcia-Cueto, E., Diaz-Cuervo, H., et al.. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). The use of the sequential probability ratio test in making grade classifications in conjunction with tailored testing (Research Report 81-4). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology.

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1980). A successful application of latent trait theory to tailored achievement testing (Research Report 80-1). University of Missouri, Department of Educational Psychology, Tailored Testing Research Laboratory.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2000). STAR Reading 2 Computer-Adaptive Reading Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2002). STAR Math 2 Computer-Adaptive Math Test and Database: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Renaissance-Learning-Inc.,. (2001). STAR Early Literacy Computer-Adaptive Diagnostic Assessment: Technical Manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.

Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1970). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. College Entrance Examination Board Research and Development Report (RDR 69-70, No 3", and Educational Testing Service RB-70-31). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Rijn, P. W. van,, Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2000). A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".

Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1982). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., Reynolds, T. J., & McCormick, D. J.. (1976). Monte carlo results from a computer program for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 2). Los Angeles CA: University of California, Department of Psychology.

Armstrong, R. D., & Roussos, L.. (2003). A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Raîche, G.. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Rudner, L. M. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.

Reckase, M. D. (1989). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive training paradigm: Hierarchical concept structures. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (II).

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive testing paradigm: Validation in technical training. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (I).

Reckase, M. D. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.

Reckase, M. D. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.

Rehab-Group-Inc.,. (1980). Final Report: Computerized adaptive testing, assessment of requirements. Falls Church VA: Author.

Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N.. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J.. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing (GRE Board Report No 98-12). Educational Testing Service RR02-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service. Note = “{PDF file, 193 KB}.

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). Evaluation plan for the computerized adaptive vocational aptitude battery (Research Report 82-1).

McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1983). An evaluation of one- and three-parameter logistic tailored testing procedures for use with small item pools (Research Report ONR83-1). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Spray, J. A., & Reckase, M. D.. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (ACT Research Report Series 87-17). Iowa City IA: American College Testing.

Bayroff, A. G., Ross, R. M., & Fischl, M. A.. (1974). Development of a programmed testing system (Technical Paper 259). Arlington VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. NTIS No. AD A001534).

Robin, F. (2000). Development and evaluation of test assembly procedures for computerized adaptive testing (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Methods Research Report No 391). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1968). The development and evaluation of several programmed testing methods (Research Bulletin 68-5). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Grist, S., Rudner, L. M., & Wise,. (1989). Computerized adaptive tests. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, no. 107.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.

Robin, F. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (1997). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Friedman, D., Steinberg, A,, & Ree, M. J.. (1981). Adaptive testing without a computer. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, Nov 1981, 11, 74-75 (Ms. No. 2350). AFHRL Technical Report 80-66.

Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Raborn, A.. (2018). What Information Works Best?: A Comparison of Routing Methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 499-515. doi:10.1177/0146621617752990

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Schmid, G., et al.. (2004). Validating the German computerized adaptive test for anxiety on healthy sample (A-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1515.

Sie, H., Finkelman, M. D., Riley, B., & Smits, N.. (2015). Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 389-405. doi:10.1177/0146621615569504

H., Q., Staniewska, D., Reckase, M., & Woo, A.. (2016). Using Response Time to Detect Item Preknowledge in Computer?Based Licensure Examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 35(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12102

Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D.. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 304-314.

Revuelta, J., & Ponsoda, V.. (1997). Una solución a la estimatión inicial en los tests adaptivos informatizados [A solution to initial estimation in CATs.]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 2, 1-6.

Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., Read, J. P., De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., Acton, G. S., et al.. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.

Rammsayer, T., & Brandler, S.. (2003). Timing behavior in computerized adaptive testing: Response times for correct and incorrect answers are not related to general fluid intelligence/Zum Zeitverhalten beim computergestützten adaptiveb Testen: Antwortlatenzen bei richtigen und falschen Lösun. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 57-63.

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M.. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M.. (2002). A structure-based approach to psychological measurement: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment, 9, 4-16.

Swaminathan, H., Hambleton, R. K., Sireci, S. G., Xing, D., & Rizavi, S. M.. (2003). Small sample estimation in dichotomous item response models: Effect of priors based on judgmental information on the accuracy of item parameter estimates. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 27-51.

Raîche, G., & Blais, J. - G.. (2006). SIMCAT 1.0: A SAS computer program for simulating computer adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 60-61.

Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A.. (2004). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.

Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1972). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 85-95.