Export 2294 results:
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Costa, D. R., Karino, C. A., Moura, F. A. S., & Andrade, D. F.. (2009). A comparison of three methods of item selection for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09costa.pdf (530.39 KB)
Seo, D. Gi. (2017). A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gXgH-epPIWJiE0LxMHGiCAxZZAwy4dAH/view?usp=sharing
Ho, R., & Hsu, T. C.. (1989). A comparison of three adaptive testing strategies using MicroCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Tang, K. L. (1996). A comparison of the traditional maximum information method and the global information method in CAT item selection. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY USA.
Yi, Q., Hanson, B., Widiatmo, H., & Harris, D. J.. (2001). Comparison of the SPRT and CMT procedures in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
Jodoin, M., Zenisky, A. L., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2002). Comparison of the psychometric properties of several computer-based test designs for credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon jo02-01.pdf (280.31 KB)
Bill, B. C. (1984). A comparison of the maximum likelihood strategy and stradaptive test on a micro-computer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon pi78-01.pdf (1.91 MB)
Ban, J., Wang, T., & Yi, Q.. (1999). Comparison of the a-stratified method, the Sympson-Hetter method, and the matched difficulty method in CAT administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Lawrence KS.
Gorman, S. (1980). A comparison of the accuracy of Bayesian adaptive and static tests using a correction for regression. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 35-50). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon go80-02_0.pdf (762.83 KB)
Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1997). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
Wise, S. L. (1999). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Meng, H., & Han, C.. (2017). Comparison of Pretest Item Calibration Methods in a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University.
Morgan, D. L., Way, W. D., & Augemberg, K. E.. (2006). A comparison of online calibration methods for a CAT. In Presented at the National Council on Measurement on Education. San Francisco, CA.
Rotou, O., Patsula, L., Steffen, M., & Rizavi, S.. (2003). Comparison of multi-stage tests with computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon ro03-01.pdf (694.76 KB)
Brossman, B. G., & Guille, R. A.. (2014). A Comparison of Multi-Stage and Linear Test Designs for Medium-Size Licensure and Certification Examinations. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(2), 18-36. presented at the 02-2014. doi:10.7333/1402-0202018
PDF icon ba09313.pdf (93.66 KB)
Tam, S. S. (1992). A comparison of methods for adaptive estimation of a multidimensional trait. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
HUnter, D. R. (1982). Comparison of live and simulated adaptive tests (No. AFHRL-TP-82-35). Air Force Human Resources Laborarory. presented at the December 1982, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Systems Command.
De Beer, M. (2003). A comparison of learning potential results at various educational levels. In Paper presented at the 6th Annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology of South Africa (SIOPSA) conference. 25-27 June 2003.
PDF icon debe03-01.pdf (390.1 KB)
Bergstrom, B., & Gershon, R. C.. (1992). Comparison of item targeting strategies for pass/fail adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
Murphy, D. L., Dodd, B. G., & Vaughn, B. K.. (2010). A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 424-437. doi:10.1177/0146621609349804
Schnipke, D. L.,, & Green, B. F.. (1995). A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.
Burt, W. M., Kim, S. - J., Davis, L. L., & Dodd, B. G.. (2003). A comparison of item exposure control procedures using a CAT system based on the generalized partial credit model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
PDF icon bu03-01.pdf (264.96 KB)
PDF icon v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
PDF icon Kingsbury & weiss #1.pdf (642.36 KB)
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 258-283). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
Kim, S., Moses, T., & Yoo, H. (Henry). (2015). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
PDF icon ki80-01.pdf (1.32 MB)
Bridgeman, B., & Schaeffer, G. A.. (1995). A comparison of gender differences on paper-and-pencil and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.
He, W., Diao, Q., & Hauser, C.. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503

Pages