Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
W
Weitzman, R. A. (1982). Use of Sequential Testing to Prescreen Prospective Entrants to Military Service. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon we82-02.pdf (437.88 KB)
Welch, R. E.,, & Frick, T.. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing in instructional settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 47-62.
Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2002). Optimum number of strata in the a-stratified adaptive testing design. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
PDF icon we02-01.pdf (113.03 KB)
Wen, J. - B., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.  . (2001). Adaptation of a-stratified method in variable length computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.
PDF icon we01-01.pdf (383.76 KB)
Wendt, A., Kao, S., Gorham, J., & Woo, A.. (2009). Developing item variants: An empirical study. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09woo.pdf (193.38 KB)
Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1985). Reducing the predictability of adaptive item sequences. In . Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, 43-48.
Wiberg, M. (2006). Sequential Computerized Mastery Tests—Three Simulation Studies. International Journal of Testing, 6, 41-55. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0601_3
Wiberg, M. (2003). An optimal design approach to criterion-referenced computerized testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 97-100.
Wightman, L. F. (1998). Practical issues in computerized test assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 292-302.
Wildgrube, W. (1982). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF): Empirical approaches. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp.353-359). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon wi82-01.pdf (383.17 KB)
Wildgrube, W. (1980). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 68-77). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborator.
PDF icon wi80-01.pdf (594.11 KB)
Williams, V. S. L. (1999). The development and cognitive evaluation of an audio-assisted computer-adaptive test for eight-grade mathematics. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Williamson, D. M., & Bejar, I. I.. (2002). Using testlet response theory to evaluate the equivalence of automatically generated multiple-choice items. In Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Eucation. New Orleans LA.
Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (1993). An investigation of restricted self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
Wise, S. L. (1997). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Wise, S. L. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
Wise, S. L., Freeman, S. A., Finney, S. J., Enders, C. K., & Severance, D. D.. (1997). The accuracy of examinee judgments of relative item difficulty: Implication for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
Wise, S. L. (1996). A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
Wise, S. L. (1999). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Wise, S. L. (1995). Item review and answer changing in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Trier, Germany.
Wise, S. L., Kingsbury, G. G., & Webb, N. L.. (2015). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094
Wise, S. L. (1999). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Wise, S. L., & G. Kingsbury, G.. (2016). Modeling Student Test-Taking Motivation in the Context of an Adaptive Achievement Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 86–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12102
Wise, L. L., Curran, L. T., & McBride, J. R.. (1997). CAT-ASVAB cost and benefit analyses. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 227-236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.
Wise, S. L., Roos, L. L., & Plake, B. S.. (1994). Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Wise, S. L. (2014). The Utility of Adaptive Testing in Addressing the Problem of Unmotivated Examinees. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(1), 1-17. doi:10.7333/1401-02010001
Wise, S. L. (1997). Overview of practical issues in a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Wise, S. L., Ponsoda, V., & Olea, J.. (2002). Self-adapted testing: An overview. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 12, 107-122.
Wise, S. L. (2011). From Reliability to Validity: Expanding Adaptive Testing Practice to Find the Most Valid Score for Each Test Taker. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.
PDF icon IACAT 2011 Wise From Reliability to Validity.pdf (619.18 KB)
Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E.. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Wolfe, J. H. (1986). Computerized testing technology. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 4, 71-78.
Wood, R. L. (1969). The efficacy of tailored testing. Educational Research, 11, 219-222.
Wood, R. L. (1971). Computerized adaptive sequential testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Wood, R. (1976). Adaptive testing: A Bayesian procedure for the efficient measurement of ability. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 13(2), 36.
Wood, R. L. (1973). Response-contingent testing. Review of Educational Research, 43, 529-544.
Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Constrained item selection using a stochastically curtailed SPRT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09wouda2.pdf (168.29 KB)
Wouda, J. T., & Eggen, T.. (2009). Computerized classification testing in more than two categories by using stochastic curtailment. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09wouda.pdf (297.3 KB)
Wright, B. D., & Douglas, G. A.. (1975). Best test design and self-tailored testing (Research Memorandum No 19). Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Education, Statistical Laboratory.
Wu, I. L. (2001). A new computer algorithm for simultaneous test construction of two-stage and multistage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 180-198.
Wyse, A. E., & Albano, A. D.. (2015). Considering the Use of General and Modified Assessment Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.1002921
X
Xiao, B. (1990). Dichotomous search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Xiao, B. (1989). Golden section search strategies for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the Fifth International Objective Measurement Workshop. Berkeley CA.
Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2001). Impact of several computer-based testing variables on the psychometric properties of credentialing examinations. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2002). Impact of test design, item quality and item bank size on the psychometric properties of computer-based credentialing exams. In Paper presented at the meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
PDF icon xi02-01.pdf (499.56 KB)
Xiong, X. (2018). A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 630-643. doi:10.1177/0146621618762739

Pages