Export 26 results:
Filters: Author is Wise, S. L. [Clear All Filters]
Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.
. (1994). Tests adaptivos y autoadaptados informatizados: Effects en la ansiedad y en la pecision de las estimaciones [SATs and CATS: Effects on enxiety and estimate precision]. In Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium de Metodologia de las Ciencies del Comportamiento. Murcia, Spain.
. (1995). Self-adapted testing: An overview. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 12, 107-122.
. (2002). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
. (1997). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.
. (1994). The rationale and principles of stratum scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.
. (1989). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.
. (2000). Overview of practical issues in a CAT program. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Item review and answer changing in computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Trier, Germany.
. (1995). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 210-221.
. (1997). An investigation of restricted self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 185-198.
. (1999). Examinee issues in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Evaluating Content Alignment in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12094
. (2015). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.
. (1992). A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1996). Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology
. (2011). Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.
. (1991). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.
. (1996). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.
. (1992). Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
. (2000). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
. (2004). The accuracy of examinee judgments of relative item difficulty: Implication for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago.
. (1997).