Lai, J. - S., Crane, P. K., Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Bode, R. K., & Heinemann, A. W.. (2003). Item banking to improve, shorten and computerized self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale. Quality of Life Research, 12, 485-501. presented at the Aug.

Lai, J. - S., Cella, D., Dineen, K., Bode, R., Von Roenn, J., Gershon, R. C., & Shevrin, D.. (2005). An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 190-7. presented at the Feb.

Millman, J., & Arter, J. A.. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1, 315-330.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2016). On the Issue of Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing With Response Times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 212–228. doi:10.1111/jedm.12110

Cook, K. F., Teal, C. R., Bjorner, J. B., Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Crane, P. K., et al.. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16, 121-132.

Ponsoda, V., Wise, S. L., Olea, J., & Revuelta, J.. (1997). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 210-221.

Liu, O. Lydia, Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N.. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1995). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using the successive intervals Rasch model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 976-990.

Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G.. (1989). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 335-357.

Leroux, A. J., J. Waid-Ebbs, K., Wen, P. - S., Helmer, D. A., Graham, D. P., O’Connor, M. K., & Ray, K.. (2019). An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 624-638. doi:10.1177/0146621618824856

Li, F., Cohen, A., & Shen, L.. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Item Position in Computer-Based Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 362–379. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00181.x

Wu, M. - L., & Chen, S. - Y.. (2008). Investigating item exposure control on the fly in computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Testing, 55, 1-32.

Mead, A. D. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 185-187. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_1

Zara, A. (1988). Introduction to item response theory and computerized adaptive testing as applied in licensure and certification testing. National Clearinghouse of Examination Information Newsletter, 6, 11-17.

Chang, S. - H. (1991). Inter-subtest branching in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 140-141.

Reckase, M. D. (1974). An interactive computer program for tailored testing based on the one-parameter logistic model. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 208-212.

Diao, Q., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2013). Integrating Test-Form Formatting Into Automated Test Assembly. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 361-374. doi:10.1177/0146621613476157

van der Linden, W. J., Veldkamp, B. P., & Reese, L. M.. (2000). An integer programming approach to item bank design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 139-150.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Velikova, G., Wall, L., Wright, E. P., Stark, D., et al.. (2007). The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 724-732.

Elhan, A. H., Oztuna, D., Kutlay, S., Kucukdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A.. (2008). An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders, 9, 166. presented at the Dec 18.

Balajthy, E. (2002). Information technology and literacy assessment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 18, 369-373.

Zheng, C., He, G., & Gao, C.. (2017). The Information Product Methods: A Unified Approach to Dual-Purpose Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 321 - 324. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617730392

Patton, J. M., Ying Cheng,, Yuan, K. - H., & Diao, Q.. (2013). The Influence of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 24-40. doi:10.1177/0146621612461727

de Ayala, R. J. (1992). The influence of dimensionality on CAT ability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 513-528.

Reckase, M. D. (2024). The Influence of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Psychometric Theory and Practice. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 11(1). doi:10.7333/2403-1101001

Huitzing, H. A., Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2005). Infeasibility in automated test assembly models: A comparison study of different methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 223-243.

Elwood, D. L., & Griffin, H. R.. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: reliability of an automated method. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9-14.

Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., & Wang, T.. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.

Li, Y. H., & Schafer, W. D.. (2005). Increasing the homogeneity of CAT's item-exposure rates by minimizing or maximizing varied target functions while assembling shadow tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 245-269.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Incorporation Of Content Balancing Requirements In Stratification Designs For Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-270. doi:10.1177/0013164403251326

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Incorporation of Content Balancing Requirements in Stratification Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 257-70.

Barrada, J. R., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & Abad, F. J.. (2008). Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 493-513.

Van de Vijver, F. J. R.,, & Harsveld, M.. (1994). The incomplete equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 852-859.

Cetin-Berber, D. Duygu, Sari, H. Ibrahim, & Huggins-Manley, A. Corinne. (2019). Imputation Methods to Deal With Missing Responses in Computerized Adaptive Multistage Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 495-511. doi:10.1177/0013164418805532

Vispoel, W. P. (1992). Improving the measurement of tonal memory with computerized adaptive tests. Psychomusicology, 11, 73-89.

Barnard, J. J. (2022). Improving Precision of CAT Measures. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Test-ing, 9(1), 1-7. presented at the 10/2022. doi:10.7333/2210-0901001

Makransky, G., Mortensen, E. L., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2012). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112437756

Chakravarty, E. F., Bjorner, J. B., & Fries, J. F.. (2007). Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1426-31. presented at the Jun.

Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.

Wang, C. (2014). Improving Measurement Precision of Hierarchical Latent Traits Using Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 452-477. doi:10.3102/1076998614559419

Ying Cheng,. (2010). Improving Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing by Balancing Attribute Coverage: The Modified Maximum Global Discrimination Index Method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 902-913. doi:10.1177/0013164410366693

Cudeck, R., McCormick, D., & Cliff, N. A.. (1980). Implied orders tailored testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 157-163.

Cudeck, R., McCormick, D. J., & Cliff, N.. (1980). Implied Orders Tailored Testing: Simulation with the Stanford-Binet. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4(2), 157-163.

Grodenchik, D. J. (2002). The implications of the use of non-optimal items in a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 63, 1606.

Leary, L. F., & Dorans, N. J.. (1985). Implications for altering the context in which test items appear: A historical perspective on an immediate concern. Review of Educational Research, 55, 387-413.

Spoden, C., Frey, A., & Bernhardt, R.. (2018). Implementing Three CATs Within Eighteen Months. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 6(3), 38-55. presented at the 09/2018. doi:10.7333/1809-060338

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2008). Implementing Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in a Shadow-Test Approach to Constrained Adaptive Testing. International Journal of Testing, 8, 272-289. doi:10.1080/15305050802262233

van der Linden, W. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2003). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 107-120.

Barnard, J. J. (2015). Implementing a CAT: The AMC Experience . Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 3(1), 1-12. doi:10.7333/15100301001

Wang, W. - C., & Chen, P. - H.. (2004). Implementation and Measurement Efficiency of Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 295-316. doi:10.1177/0146621604265938

Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Impact of Test Design, Item Quality, and Item Bank Size on the Psychometric Properties of Computer-Based Credentialing Examinations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 5-21. doi:10.1177/0013164403258393

O'Neill, T., Lunz, M. E., & Thiede, K.. (2000). The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 131-151.

Muckle, T. J., Bergstrom, B. A., Becker, K., & Stahl, J. A.. (2008). Impact of altering randomization intervals on precision of measurement and item exposure. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(2), 160-167.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. L.. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.

Frey, A., & Ehmke, T.. (2007). Hypothetischer Einsatz adaptiven Testens bei der Messung von Bildungsstandards in Mathematik [Hypothetical use of adaptive testing for the measurement of educational standards in mathematics] . . Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 169-184.

Frey, A., & Seitz, N. - N.. (2011). Hypothetical use of multidimensional adaptive testing for the assessment of student achievement in PISA. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 503-522.

Chang, H. - H., & Zhang, J.. (2002). Hypergeometric family and item overlap rates in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 67, 387-398.

Xiong, X. (2018). A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 630-643. doi:10.1177/0146621618762739

Wang, S., Lin, H., Chang, H. - H., & Douglas, J.. (2016). Hybrid Computerized Adaptive Testing: From Group Sequential Design to Fully Sequential Design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53, 45–62. doi:10.1111/jedm.12100