A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). A comparison of conventional and adaptive testing procedures for making single-point decisions. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing: A four-year-old pilot study shows that CAT can work. Technological Horizons in Education, 16 (4), 73-76.
. (1988). Creating a K-12 Adaptive Test: Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates and Measurement Scales. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12. Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology
. (2011). Computerized adaptive testing: A pilot project. In . W. C. Ryan (ed.), Proceedings: NECC 86, National Educational Computing Conference (pp.172-176). Eugene OR: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.
. (1986). A comparison of achievement level estimates from computerized adaptive testing and paper-and-pencil testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1988). ki88-01.pdf (42.27 KB)ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 40-48.
. (2008). ICAT- An Adaptive Testing Procedure for the Identification of Idiosyncratic Knowledge Patterns.pdf (322.62 KB)A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-04.pdf (1.86 MB)Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.
. (1989). Item review and adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1996). A comparison of ICC-based adaptive mastery testing and the Waldian probability ratio method. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 120-139). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ki80-01.pdf (1.32 MB)Computer adaptive testing and the No Child Left Behind Act. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA.
. (2004). ki04-01.pdf (116.03 KB)A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 1-8). New York: Academic Press.
. (1983). Kingsbury & weiss #1.pdf (642.36 KB)From Blueprints to Systems: An Integrated Approach to Adaptive Testing. In IACAT 2017 Conference. presented at the 08/2017, Niigata, Japan: Niigata Seiryo University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBaAfH4ES7XivmvrMjPeKyFCsFZOpQMJ
. (2017). An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (2002). ki02-01.pdf (133.01 KB)Assessing the utility of item response models: computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27.
. (1993). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
. (1979). ki79-05.pdf (2.1 MB)ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure for the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 40–48.
. (2008). ICAT: An adaptive testing procedure to allow the identification of idiosyncratic knowledge patterns. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07Kingsbury.pdf (160.68 KB)A practical examination of the use of free-response questions in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Atlanta GA.
. (1993). ki93-01.pdf (29.04 KB)Standard errors of proficiency estimates in stratum scored CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1999). Adaptive self-referenced testing as a procedure for the measurement of individual change in instruction: A comparison of the reliabilities of change estimates obtained from conventional and adaptive testing procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univerity of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
. (1984). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001
. (2020). Kingsbury and Wise-Final FINAL.pdf (516.77 KB)An empirical comparison of achievement level estimates from adaptive tests and paper-and-pencil tests. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. USA.
. (2002). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection. Applied Measurement in Education.
. (1991). Adaptive measurement of individual change. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216, 49-58. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.49
. (2008). ki08049.pdf (567.72 KB)Comparison of computerized adaptive testing and classical methods for measuring individual change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2007). cat07kim-kang.pdf (346.06 KB)Individual differences in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.
. (1993). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977
. (2012). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 54, 2548.
. (1994). Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 554-570. doi:10.1177/0013164407310132
. (2008). Monte Carlo simulation comparison of two-stage testing and computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta, GA.
. (1993). A Comparison of IRT Proficiency Estimation Methods Under Adaptive Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 70–79. doi:10.1111/jedm.12063
. (2015). The influence of examinee test-taking behavior motivation in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco CA.
. (1995). Real-data simulation of a proposal for tailored teting. In Third International Conference on Educational Testing. presented at the 06/1977, Leyden, The Netherlands.
. (1977). A tailored testing system for selection and allocation in the British Army. In Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Applied Psychology. Montreal Canada.
. (1974). A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).
. (1976). The potential use of tailored testing for allocation to army employments. In NATO Conference on Utilisation of Human Resources. presented at the 06/1973, Lisbon, Portugal.
. (1973). Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1983). Adequacy of an item pool measuring proficiency in English language to implement a CAT procedure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
. (2009). cat09karino.pdf (159.63 KB)Use of an on-line computer for psychological testing with the up-and-down method. American Psychologist, 24, 207-211.
. (1969). New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39, 167-188. doi:10.1177/0146621614554650
. (2015). A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-64. doi:10.1177/0146621619835500
. (2020). Dual-Objective Item Selection Criteria in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 165–183. doi:10.1111/jedm.12139
. (2017). Parameter Drift Detection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Informational Distance/Divergence Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 534-550. doi:10.1177/0146621616663676
. (2016). A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(52). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-52
. (2011). Tailored interviewing: An application of item response theory for personality measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 502-519.
. (1989). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 47-59.
. (1999). Test security and item exposure control for computer-based . In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Educatio. Chicago.
. (2000). Effect of item selection on item exposure rates within a computerized classification test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.
. (1998). A model for computerized adaptive testing related to instructional situations. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 101-119). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
. (1980). ka80-01.pdf (1 MB)The comparison of two tailored testing models and the effects of the models variables on actual loss. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
. (1974). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 22-28.
. (1974). Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .
. (1980). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 111-120.
. (1973). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Educational Evaluation and Research Design Program.
. (1974). Stratified Item Selection and Exposure Control in Unidimensional Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Two-Dimensional Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 563-576. doi:10.1177/0146621614536768
. (2014). Effects of Different Computerized Adaptive Testing Strategies of Recovery of Ability. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
. (2011). kalender_dissertation1.pdf (993.04 KB)Computerized Adaptive Testing for Student Selection to Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education.
. (2012). CAT_StudentSelection1.pdf (120.81 KB)Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.
. (2005).