Export 2294 results:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
L
Linn, R. L. (1975). Discussion. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5), pp. 44-46. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon li75-01.pdf (413.98 KB)
Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cleary, T. A.. (1972). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 85-95.
Linn, R. L., & Cleary, T. A.. (1969). The development and evaluation of several programmed testing methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 129-146.
Liu, M., Zhu, R., & Guo, F.. (2001). Impact of item location effects on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1999). Impact of flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
Liu, S., Cai, Y., & Tu, D.. (2018). On-the-Fly Constraint-Controlled Assembly Methods for Multistage Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 595-613. doi:10.1111/jedm.12194
Liu, O. Lydia, Bridgeman, B., Gu, L., Xu, J., & Kong, N.. (2015). Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 1002-1020. doi:10.1177/0013164415573988
Liu, M., & Steffen, M.. (1998). The impact of scoring flawed items on ability estimation in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Urbana, IL.
Lord, F. M. (1978). Panel discussion: Future directions for computerized adaptive testing. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Item Response Theory and Computerized adaptive conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.
Lord, F. M. (1971). The self-scoring flexilevel test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 147-151.
Lord, F. M. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
Lord, F. M. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lord, F. M. (1976). Some likelihood functions found in tailored testing. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 79-81). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon lo75-02.pdf (165.27 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1971). Robbins-Monro procedures for tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 3-31.
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing: An application of stochastic approximation (RM 71-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lord, F. M. (1976). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 113-117). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon lo75-03.pdf (317.31 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of two-stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227-242.
Lord, F. M. (1976). Test theory and the public interest. Proceedings of the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference.
Lord, F. M. (1983). Small N justifies Rasch model. In R. D. Bock, New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51-61). New York, NY. USA: Academic Press.
Lord, F. M. (1970). The self-scoring flexilevel test (RB-7043). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lord, F. M. (1977). A broad-range tailored test of verbal ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 95-100.
Lord, F. M. (1976). A broad range tailored test of verbal ability. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 75-78). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PDF icon lo75-01.pdf (249.89 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1977). A Broad-Range Tailored Test of Verbal Ability . Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 95-100.
PDF icon v01n1p095.pdf (402.88 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1971). A theoretical study of the measurement effectiveness of flexilevel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 805-813.
Lord, F. M. (1975). A broad range test of verbal ability (RB-75-5). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
PDF icon lo75-01.pdf (249.89 KB)
Lord, F. M. (1980). Some how and which for practical tailored testing. In . L. J. T. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak and D.N.M. de Gruijter (Eds): Psychometrics for educational debates (pp. 189-206). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Computer-Assisted Instruction, Testing, and Guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
Lord, F. M. (1971). Tailored testing, an approximation of stochastic approximation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 707-711.
Lord, F. M. (1974). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory. In . D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman.
Loyd, B. H. (1984). Efficiency and precision in two-stage adaptive testing. West Palm Beach Florida: Eastern ERA.
Lu, Y., Pitoniak, M., Rizavi, S., Way, W. D., & Steffan, M.. (2003). Evaluating computerized adaptive testing design for the MCAT with realistic simulated data. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon lu03-01.pdf (984.95 KB)
Lu, Y., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Statistics for detecting disclosed items in a CAT environment. Metodologia de Las Ciencias del Comportamiento., 5(2).
Lu, Y., & Robin, F.. (2003). Evaluating a new approach to detect aberrant responses in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.
Lu, Y., & Rizavi, S.. (2003). Methods for item set selection in adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon lu03-02.pdf (441.94 KB)
Luecht, R. M., & Burgin, W. L.. (2003). Test information targeting strategies for adaptive multistage testlet designs. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon lu03-03.pdf (178.13 KB)
Luecht, R. M. (1995). Some alternative CAT item selection heuristics (Internal report). Philadelphia PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
Luecht, R. M., & Clauser, B. E.. (2002). Test models for complex computer-based testing. In . C. N. Mille,. M. T. Potenza, J. J. Fremer, and W. C. Ward (Eds.). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Luecht, R. M. (1994). A few more issues to consider in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Luecht, R. M., Nungester, R. J., & Hadadi, A.. (1996). Heuristics based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Luecht, R. M. (1998). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22 , 224-236.
Luecht, R. M., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2002). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA examination. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.. New Orleans.
PDF icon lu02-01.pdf (191.34 KB)
Luecht, R., Brumfield, T., & Breithaupt, K.. (2006). A testlet assembly design for the uniform CPA Examination. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 189-202. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2
Luecht, R. M. (2009). Adaptive computer-based tasks under an assessment engineering paradigm. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
PDF icon cat09luecht.pdf (288.75 KB)
Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
Luecht, R. M. (2004). Computer-adaptive testing. In . B. Everett, and D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New York: Wiley.
Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1997). Overview of the USMLE Step 2 computerized field test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
PDF icon v20n4p389.pdf (1.19 MB)
Luecht, R. M. (2000). Implementing the computer-adaptive sequential testing (CAST) framework to mass produce high quality computer-adaptive and mastery tests. In Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA.
Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (1998). Some practical examples of computerized adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.
Luecht, R. M., Hadadi, A., & Nungester, R. J.. (1996). Heuristic-based CAT: Balancing item information, content, and exposure. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
Luecht, R. M. (1998). CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
Luecht, R. M. (2003). Exposure control using adaptive multi-stage item bundles. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL. USA.
PDF icon lu03-04.pdf (115.22 KB)
Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J.. (2000). Computer-adaptive sequential testing. In . W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 289-209). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Luecht, R. M. (1998). A framework for exploring and controlling risks associated with test item exposure over time. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.

Pages