Divgi, D. R. (1986). Determining the sensitivity of CAT-ASVAB scores to changes in item response curves with the medium of administration (Report No.86-189). Alexandria VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Whitaker, M., Kim, D. - I., Zhang, L., & Choi, S. W.. (2014). Determining the Overall Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 419–440. doi:10.1111/jedm.12052

Abad, F. J., Olea, J., Aguado, D., Ponsoda, V., & Barrada, J. R.. (2010). Deterioro de parámetros de los ítems en tests adaptativos informatizados: estudio con eCAT [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT]. Psicothema, 22, 340-7.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2002). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive tests with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 164-180.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items (Research Report 00-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Stoop, E. M. L. A. (2001). Detection of misfitting item-score patterns in computerized adaptive testing. Enschede, The Netherlands: Febodruk B.

Veerkamp, W. J. J., & Glas, C. E. W.. (2000). Detection of known items in adaptive testing with a statistical quality control method. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 373-389.

van der Linden, W. J. (1997). Detection of aberrant response patterns in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.

Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., Veldkamp, B. P., Schakel, L., & Smid, N. G.. (2010). Detection of aberrant item score patterns in computerized adaptive testing: An empirical example using the CUSUM. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 921-925.

Patsula, L. N., & McLeod, L. D.. (2000). Detecting test-takers who have memorized items in computerized-adaptive testing and muti-stage testing: A comparison. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In . W. J. van der Linden, and C. A. W. Glas (Editors). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Norwell MA: Kluwer.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detecting person misfit in adaptive testing using statistical process control techniques. In Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 201-219). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2010). Detecting Person Misfit in Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 315-329). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Swygert, K. (1997). Detecting misbehaving items in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL.

Mislevy, J. L., Rupp, A. A., & Harring, J. R.. (2012). Detecting Local Item Dependence in Polytomous Adaptive Data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00165.x

McLeod, L. D., & Schinpke, D. L.. (1999). Detecting items that have been memorized in the CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.

Belov, D. I. (2014). Detecting Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Information Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(3), 37-58. doi:10.7333/1410-0203037

McLeod L. D.,, & Lewis, C.. (1999). Detecting item memorization in the CAT environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 147-160.

Han, N., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2004). Detecting exposed test items in computer-based testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego CA.

van der Linden, W. J., Breithaupt, K., Chuah, S. C., & Zhang, Y.. (2007). Detecting Differential Speededness in Multistage Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 117–130. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00030.x

Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C.. (2011). Detecting DIF between Conventional and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Monte Carlo Study. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

Parshall, C. G., & Harmes, J. C.. (2007). Designing templates based on a taxonomy of innovative items. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Gu, L., & Reckase, M. D.. (2007). Designing optimal item pools for computerized adaptive tests with Sympson-Hetter exposure control. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Reckase, M. D. (2010). Designing item pools to optimize the functioning of a computerized adaptive test. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 127-141.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (1999). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 99-03 ). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2000). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 149–162). Dendrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2010). Designing Item Pools for Adaptive Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 231-245). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Davey, T., & Pitoniak, M. J.. (2006). Designing computerized adaptive tests. In . S.M. Downing and T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Melican, G. J., Breithaupt, K., & Zhang, Y.. (2010). Designing and Implementing a Multistage Adaptive Test: The Uniform CPA Exam. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 167-190). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Reckase, M. D. (2007). The design of p-optimal item banks for computerized adaptive tests. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. {PDF file, 211 KB}.

Vale, C. D. (1982). Design of a Microcomputer-Based Adaptive Testing System. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 360-371). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborat.

McBride, J. R. (1984). The design of a computerized adaptive testing system for administering the ASVAB. In Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

Jacobsen, J., Ackermann, R., Egüez, J., Ganguli, D., Rickard, P., & Taylor, L.. (2011). Design of a Computer-Adaptive Test to Measure English Literacy and Numeracy in the Singapore Workforce: Considerations, Benefits, and Implications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.testpublishers.org/journal-of-applied-testing-technology

Vale, C. D. (1981). Design and implementation of a microcomputer-based adaptive testing system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 399-406.

Ho, R.-G.,, & Yen, Y. - C.. (2005). Design and evaluation of an XML-based platform-independent computerized adaptive testing system. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2), 230-237.

Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2007). The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 49.

Patience, W. M. (1977). Description of components in tailored testing. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 153-157.

Wang, C., Chang, H. - H., & Boughton, K. A.. (2013). Deriving Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 99-122. doi:10.1177/0146621612463422

Eignor, D. R. (1993). Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Grabovsky, I., Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (2001). Deriving a stopping rule for sequential adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.

Ban, J. - C., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J.. (2002). Data sparseness and on-line pretest item calibration-scaling methods in CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 207-218.

Ban, J., Hanson, B. A., Yi, Q., & Harris, D.. (2001). Data sparseness and online pretest calibration/scaling methods in CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle.

Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Reeve, B. B., Talcott, J. A., Clark, J. A., et al.. (2005). Data pooling and analysis to build a preliminary item bank: an example using bowel function in prostate cancer. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 142-59.

Tatsuoka, K., & Birenbaum, M.. (1979). The danger of relying solely on diagnostic adaptive testing when prior and subsequent instructional methods are different (CERL Report E-5). Urbana IL: Univeristy of Illinois, Computer-Based Education Research Laboratory.

Ro, S., & Thompson, N. A.. (2007). Cutscore location and classification accuracy in computerized classification testing. In Paper presented at the international meeting of the Psychometric Society. Tokyo, Japan.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2001). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 199-218.

McBride, J. R. (1996). Current research in computer-based testing for personnel selection and classification in the United States. In Invited address to the Centre for Recruitment and Selection, Belgian Armed Forces".

Butcher, J. N., Keller, L. S., & Bacon, S. F.. (1985). Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803-815.

Zenisky, A. L. (1999). Current and future research in multi-stage testing (Research Report No 370). Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Laboratory of Pychometric and Evaluative Research.

Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E.. (1997). Current and future challenges. In . W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, and J. R. McBride (Eds.). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp 257-269). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Cross-validating item parameter estimation in adaptive testing. In . A. Boorsma, M. A. J. van Duijn, and T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.) (pp. 205-219), Essays on item response theory. New York: Springer.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Green, B. F. (1988). Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement, , ,. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 223-231.

Wise, S. L. (1996). A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.

Sympson, J. B. (1979). Criterion-related validity of conventional and adaptive tests in a military environment. In Paper presented at the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN.

Schneider, R. J., McLellan, R. A., Kantrowitz, T. M., Houston, J. S., & Borman, W. C.. (2009). Criterion-related validity of an innovative CAT-based personality measure. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Thompson, J. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Samejima, F. (2003). Criterion item characteristic curve function for evaluating the differential weight procedure adjusted to on-line item calibration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCME. Chicago IL.