Export 22 results:
Filters: Author is Green, B. F. [Clear All Filters]
Utility of predicting starting abilities in sequential computer-based adaptive tests (Research Report 90-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
. (1990). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.
. (1984). The promise of tailored tests. In . H. Wainer and S. Messick (Eds.). Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 69-80). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1983). A plan for scaling the computerized adaptive Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.
. (1984). Item-presentation controls for computerized adaptive testing: Content-balancing versus min-CAT (Research Report 89-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Laboratory.
. (1989). Future challenges. In . H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 233-272). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). . (1984).
Equivalence of conventional and computer presentation of speed tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 23-34.
. (1986). Discussion. In . C. K. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. pp. 118-119). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
. (1976). gr75-01.pdf (346.01 KB)Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement, , ,. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 223-231.
. (1988). Construct validity of computer-based tests. In . H. Wainer and H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 77-103). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). A comparison of item selection routines in linear and adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 227-242.
. (1995). Comments on tailored testing. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp. 184-197). New York: Harper and Row.
. (1970). A Comment on Early Student Blunders on Computer-Based Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(2), 165-174. doi:10.1177/0146621610377080
. (2011). Analysis of speeded test data from experimental CAT system. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
. (1984). Analysis of experimental CAT ASVAB data. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.
. (1984). Alternate methods of scoring computer-based adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Adaptive testing by computer. In . R. B. Ekstrom (ed.), Measurement, technology, and individuality in education. New directions for testing and measurement, Number 17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
. (1983). Adaptive Estimation When the Unidimensionality Assumption of IRT is Violated. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 373-390.
. (1989). v13n4p373.pdf (1.42 MB)Adaptive estimation when the unidimensionality assumption of IRT is violated. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 373-389.
. (1989).