Fujimori, S. (1995). A study of psychologically optimal level of item difficulty. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 65, 446-53. presented at the Feb.

Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B.. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.

Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D.. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-7.

Friedman, D., Steinberg, A,, & Ree, M. J.. (1981). Adaptive testing without a computer. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, Nov 1981, 11, 74-75 (Ms. No. 2350). AFHRL Technical Report 80-66.

Frick, T. W. (1990). A comparison of three decision models for adapting the length of computer-based mastery tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(4), 479-513.

Frick, T. W., Plew, G. T., & Luk, H. - K.. (1989). EXSPRT: An expert systems approach to computer-based adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. San Francisco.).

Frick, T. W. (1992). Computerized adaptive mastery tests as expert systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(2), 187-213.

Frick, T. W. (1989). Bayesian adaptation during computer-based tests and computer-guided practice exercises. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 89-114.

Frick, T. W. (1989). A comparison of an expert systems approach to computerized adaptive testing and an IRT model. Unpublished manuscript (submitted to American Educational Research Journal).

Frick, T. W. (1992). Computerized adaptive mastery tests as expert systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 187-213.

Frey, A. (2012). Adaptives Testen [Adaptive testing]. In Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer.

Frey, A., & Seitz, N. - N.. (2009). Multidimensional adaptive testing in educational and psychological measurement: Current state and future challenges. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 89-94.

Frey, A., & Carstensen, C. H.. (2009). Diagnostic classification models and multidimensional adaptive testing: A commentary on Rupp and Templin. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 7, 58-61.

Frey, A., Seitz, N. - N., & Kröhne, U.. (2013). Reporting differentiated literacy results in PISA by using multidimensional adaptive testing. . In Research on PISA.. Dodrecht: Springer.

Frey, A., & Moosbrugger, H.. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dern FAKT vermieden werden? [Avoiding the confounding of concentration performance and activation by adaptive testing with the FACT]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1-17.

Frey, A., & Seitz, N. - N.. (2010). Multidimensionale adaptive Kompetenzdiagnostik: Ergebnisse zur Messeffizienz [Multidimensional adaptive testing of competencies: Results regarding measurement efficiency]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 56, 40-51.

Frey, A. (2006). Validitätssteigerungen durch adaptives Testen [Increasing validity by adaptive testing].

Frey, A., & Ehmke, T.. (2007). Hypothetischer Einsatz adaptiven Testens bei der Messung von Bildungsstandards in Mathematik [Hypothetical use of adaptive testing for the measurement of educational standards in mathematics] . . Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 169-184.

Frey, A., & Seitz, N. - N.. (2011). Hypothetical use of multidimensional adaptive testing for the assessment of student achievement in PISA. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 503-522.

Frey, A., Hartig, J., & Moosbrugger, H.. (2009). Effekte des adaptiven Testens auf die Moti¬vation zur Testbearbeitung [Effects of adaptive testing on test taking motivation].. Diagnostica, 55, 20-28.

French, B. F., & Thompson, T. T.. (2003). The evaluation of exposure control procedures for an operational CAT. . In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago IL.

Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Norra, C., Eberle, N., Kircher, T., Schauerte, P., et al.. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 186-97. presented at the May.

Forker, J. E., & McDonald, M. E.. (1996). Methodologic trends in the healthcare professions: computer adaptive and computer simulation testing. Nurse Education, 21, 13-4. presented at the Jul-Aug.

Forbey, J. D., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Gartland, D.. (2009). Validation of the MMPI-2 computerized adaptive version (MMPI-2-CA) in a correctional intake facility. Psychological Services, 6, 279-292.

Forbey, J. D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2007). Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version. Psychological Assessment, 19, 14-24. presented at the Mar.

Forbey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Foong, Y. - Y., & Lam, T. - L.. (1991). The use of the graded response model in computerized adaptive testing of the attitudes to science scale. In annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. presented at the April 3-7, 1991, Chicago, IL USA.

Folk, V. G., & Green, B. F.. (1989). Adaptive Estimation When the Unidimensionality Assumption of IRT is Violated. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 373-390.

Folk, V.G.,, & Green, B. F.. (1989). Adaptive estimation when the unidimensionality assumption of IRT is violated. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 373-389.

Fobey, J. D., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S.. (2000). A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 83-96.

Flynn, K. E., Dombeck, C. B., DeWitt, E. M., Schulman, K. A., & Weinfurt, K. P.. (2008). Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: investigator perceptions. Clinical Trials, 5, 575-86.

Fliege, H., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., & Klapp, B. F.. (2009). Evaluation of a computer-adaptive test for the assessment of depression (D-CAT) in clinical application. International Journal for Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18, 233-236. presented at the Feb 4.

Fliege, H., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Bjorner, J. B., Klapp, B. F., & Rose, M.. (2005). Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 14, 2277–2291.

Flens, G., Smits, N., Terwee, C. B., Dekker, J., Huijbrechts, I., Spinhoven, P., & de Beurs, E.. (In Press). Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test for Anxiety Based on the Dutch–Flemish Version of the PROMIS Item Bank. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191117746742

Flens, G., Smits, N., Terwee, C. B., Dekker, J., Huijbrechts, I., & de Beurs, E.. (2017). Development of a Computer Adaptive Test for Depression Based on the Dutch-Flemish Version of the PROMIS Item Bank. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 40, 79-105. doi:10.1177/0163278716684168

Flaugher, R. (2000). Item pools. In . Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fischer, G. H., & Pendl, P.. (1980). Individualized testing on the basis of the Rasch model. In . In J. Th. Van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak, and D. N. M. de Gruijter (Eds.). Psychometrics for educational debates. New York: Wiley.

Finkelman, M., & Wang, C.. (2019). Time-Efficient Adaptive Measurement of Change. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 7(2), 15-34. doi:10.7333/1909-0702015

Finkelman, M. D. (2010). Variations on Stochastic Curtailment in Sequential Mastery Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 27-45. doi:10.1177/0146621609336113

Finkelman, M., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2009). Item selection and hypothesis testing for the adaptive measurement of change. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., & Kim-Kang, G.. (2010). Item Selection and Hypothesis Testing for the Adaptive Measurement of Change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 238-254. doi:10.1177/0146621609344844

Finkelman, M. D. (2008). On using stochastic curtailment to shorten the SPRT in sequential mastery testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 442.

Finkelman, M., Nering, M. L., & Roussos, L. A.. (2009). A conditional exposure control method for multidimensional adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 84-103.

Finkelman, M. (2008). The Wald–Wolfowitz Theorem Is Violated in Sequential Mastery Testing. Sequential Analysis, 27, 293-303.

Finkelman, M., Nering, M. L., & Roussos, L. A.. (2009). A Conditional Exposure Control Method for Multidimensional Adaptive Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 84–103. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2009.01070.x

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., Weissman, A., & Cook, R. J.. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(4), 59-76. doi:10.7333/1412-0204059

Finkelman, M. (2003). An adaptation of stochastic curtailment to truncate Wald’s SPRT in computerized adaptive testing. presented at the Steptember, 2003, Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., He, Y., & Lai, A. M.. (2013). Item Ordering in Stochastically Curtailed Health Questionnaires With an Observable Outcome. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(3), 38-66. doi:10.7333/1304-0103038

Fields, F. A. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing for NCLEX-PN. Journal of Practical Nursing, 42, 8-10. presented at the Jun.

Ferguson, R. L. (1969). Computer-assisted criterion-referenced measurement (Working Paper No 49). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning and Research Development Center. (ERIC No. ED 037 089).

Ferguson, R. L., & Novick, M. R.. (1973). Implementation of a Bayesian system for decision analysis in a program of individually prescribed instruction (Research Report No 60). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Ferguson, R. L. (1970). A model for computer-assisted criterion-referenced measurement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association/National Council on Measurement in Education. Minneapolis MN.

Ferguson, R. L. (1969). The development, implementation, and evaluation of a computer-assisted branched test for a program of individually prescribed instruction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Dissertation Abstracts International, 30-09A, 3856. (University Microfilms No. 70-4530).

Ferguson, R. L., & Hsu, T.. (1971). The application of item generators for individualizing mathematics testing and instruction (Report 1971/14). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.

Ferguson, R. L. (1971). A model for computer-assisted criterion-referenced measurement. Education, 81, 25-31.

Ferguson, R. L. (1971). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh R and D Center.

Ferguson, R. L. (1970). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Computers and Automation, March 1970, 19.

Ferguson, R. L. (1970). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

Ferdous, A. A., Plake, B. S., & Chang, S. - R.. (2007). The effect of including pretest items in an operational computerized adaptive test: Do different ability examinees spend different amounts of time on embedded pretest items?. Educational Assessment, 12, 161-173.

Feng, X. (2003). Statistical detection and estimation of differential item functioning in computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64, 2736.