Export 497 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is C [Clear All Filters]
. (2002). Computer adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 62, 3410.
. (2002). Computer-adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers’ reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 320-332.
. (2008). CAT-MD: Computerized adaptive testing on mobile devices. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3, 13-20.
. (2010). Computerized adaptive testing based on decision trees. In 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (Vol. 58, pp. 191-193). Sousse, Tunisia: IEEE Computer Sience.
. (1977). Computerized Adaptive Testing and Personnel Accessioning System Design. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
un77196.pdf (1.16 MB). (1976). Computer-assisted testing with live examinees: A rendezvous with reality (TN 75-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1974). Computer-assisted testing: The calibration and evaluation of the verbal ability bank (Technical Study 74-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.
. (1995). Computerized testing for licensure. In . J. Impara (ed.), Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and Practices (pp. 291-320). Lincoln NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
. (2004). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273-291.
. (2002). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests (Research Report No. 02-06). University of Twente, The Netherlands.
. (2000). Cross-validating item parameter estimation in adaptive testing. In . A. Boorsma, M. A. J. van Duijn, and T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.) (pp. 205-219), Essays on item response theory. New York: Springer.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
. (1998). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing (Research Report 98-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.
. (2000). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In . W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.27-52). Norwell MA: Kluwer.
. (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
. (2000). Capitalization on item calibration error in adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 35-53.
. (2003). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (2010). Constrained Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 31-56). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
. (2005). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
. (2005). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report 02-03.
. (2001). Computerized adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 343-355.
. (1996). A comparison of adaptive self-referenced testing and classical approaches to the measurement of individual change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive music tests: A new solution to three old problems. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Music Educators National Conference. Washington DC.
. (1994). Computerized-adaptive and self-adapted music-listening tests: Features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.
. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29-49.
. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1990). Creating adaptive tests of musical ability with limited-size item pools. In . D. Dalton (Ed.), ADCIS 32nd International Conference Proceedings (pp. 105-112). Columbus OH: Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems.
. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.
. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43-63.
. (1999). Creating computerized adaptive tests of music aptitude: Problems, solutions, and future directions. In . F. Drasgow and J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 151-176). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2001). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests?. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Seattle WA.
. (1993). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item versions of the ITED Vocabulary test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 779-788.
. (1987). CATS, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 185-202.
. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.
. (1992). A comparison of the performance of simulated hierarchical and linear testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 243-251.
. (2000). Caveats, pitfalls, and unexpected consequences of implementing large-scale computerized testing. In . Wainer, H. (Ed). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). pp. 271-299. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd edition). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the One-Parameter Logistic Response Model With Ability-Based Guessing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 925-941. doi:10.1177/0013164410392372
. (2011). Computerized Classification Testing Under the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 114-128. doi:10.1177/0013164410391575
. (1986). College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1988). The College Board computerized placement tests: An application of computerized adaptive testing. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 271-282.
. (1971). A comparison of computer-simulated conventional and branching tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 125-136.
. (1995). A comparison of two IRT-based models for computerized mastery testing when item parameter estimates are uncertain. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1975). Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and prospects (Research Report 75-5). In . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
we75-01.pdf (3.94 MB). (1987). Computerized adaptive testing for measuring abilities and other psychological variables. In . J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized personality measurement: A practitioners guide (pp. 325-343). New York: Basic Books.
. (2004). Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70-84.
we04070.pdf (229.1 KB). (2007). Computerized adaptive testing with the bifactor model. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
cat07weiss&gibbons.pdf (158.22 KB). (1993). Computerized adaptive testing in instructional settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 47-62.
. (1982). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF): Empirical approaches. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp.353-359). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
wi82-01.pdf (383.17 KB). (1980). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF). In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 68-77). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laborator.
wi80-01.pdf (594.11 KB). (1989). A consideration for variable length adaptive tests (Research Report 89-40). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1999). Comparison of stratum scored and maximum likelihood scoring. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, Canada.
. (1996). A critical analysis of the argument for and against item review in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York.
. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.