Export 148 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is H  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
H
Hart, D. L., & Wright, B. D.. (2002). Development of an index of physical functional health status in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 655-65. presented at the May.
Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1995). An investigation of item calibration procedures for a computerized licensure examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Francisco, CA.
Haynie, K. A., & Way, W. D.. (1994). The effects of item pool depth on the accuracy of pass/fail decisions for NCLEX using CAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans.
He, W., & Reckase, M. D.. (2014). Item Pool Design for an Operational Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 473-494. doi:10.1177/0013164413509629
He, Q., & Tymms, P.. (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419-429.
He, Y., Chen, P., & Li, Y.. (2020). New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146621618824854
He, W., Diao, Q., & Hauser, C.. (2014). A Comparison of Four Item-Selection Methods for Severely Constrained CATs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 677-696. doi:10.1177/0013164413517503
Hendrickson, A. B., & Kolen, M. J.. (1992). Scaling of two-stage adaptive test configurations for achievement testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
Hendrickson, A. (2007). An NCME instructional module on multistage testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(2), 44-52.
PDF icon v13n4p363.pdf (1.06 MB)
Henson, R. K., & Douglas, J.. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.
Hetter, R. D., Segall, D. O., & Bloxom, B. M.. (1997). Evaluating item calibration medium in computerized adaptive testing. In . W.A. Sands, B.K. Waters and J.R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 161-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
PDF icon v18n3p197.pdf (1.07 MB)
Hetter, R. D., & Sympson, J. B.. (1997). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In J. R. McBride, Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
Ho, R., & Hsu, T. C.. (1989). A comparison of three adaptive testing strategies using MicroCAT. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Ho, T. - H., & Dodd, B. G.. (2012). Item Selection and Ability Estimation Procedures for a Mixed-Format Adaptive Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 305-326. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.714686
Hogan, P. F., McBride, J. R., & Curran, L. T.. (1995). An evaluation of alternative concepts for administering the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to applicants for enlistment. DMDC Technical Report 95-013. Monterey, CA: Personnel Testing Division, Defense Manpower Data Center.
Hogan, P. F., Dall, T., & McBride, J. R.. (1996). Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative ASVAB testing concepts at MET sites. Interim report to Defense Manpower Data Center. Fairfax, VA: Lewin-VHI, Inc.
Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J.. (2008). Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12
PDF icon Computerized Adaptive Testing of Personality Traits.pdf (518.72 KB)
Hol, A. M. (2006). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.
Holland, P. W., & Zwick, R.. (1991). A simulation study of some simple approaches to the study of DIF for CATs. Internal memorandum, Educational Testing Service.
Holmes, R. M., & Segall, D. O.. (1999). Reducing item exposure without reducing precision (much) in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, CA.
Holst, P. M., O’Donnell, A. M., & Rocklin, T. R.. (1992). Effects of feedback during self-adapted testing on estimates of ability. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Holtzman, W. H. (1970). Individually tailored testing: Discussion. In . W. H. Holtzman, (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp.198-200). New York: Harper and Row.
Hong Jiao,, Macready, G., Liu, J., & Cho, Y.. (2012). A Mixture Rasch Model–Based Computerized Adaptive Test for Latent Class Identification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 469-493. doi:10.1177/0146621612450068
Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2004). Assisted self-adapted testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 2-9.
Hontangas, P., Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Wise, S. L.. (2000). The choice of item difficulty in self adapted testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 3-12.
Hornke, L. F. (1979). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing. Programmed Larning and Educational Technology, 16, 164-169.
Hornke, L. F. (1977). Four realizations of pyramidal adaptive testing strategies. In Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing. University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hornke, L. F., & Sauter, M. B.. (1980). A validity study of an adaptive test of reading comprehension. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1979 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference (pp. 57-67). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
PDF icon ho80-01.pdf (675.09 KB)
Hornke, L. F. (1999). Benefits from computerized adaptive testing as seen in simulation studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 91-98.
Hornke, L. F. (1995). Item times in computerized testing: A new differential information. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (Suppl. 1), 108-109.
Hou, L., Chen, S., G., D. B., & Fitzpatrick, S. J.. (1996). The effects of methods of theta estimation, prior distribution, and number of quadrature points on CAT using the graded response model. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York NY.
Hsu, T., & Pingel, K.. (1974). A Bayesian approach in sequential testing. In American Educational Research Association. presented at the 04/1974, Chicago IL.

Pages