Bibliography | Page 2 | IACAT

Search

Show only items where

Author

Type

Term

Year

Keyword

Export 87 results:

Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is E [Clear All Filters]

Journal Article

van Groen, M. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2014). Item Selection Methods Based on Multiple Objective Approaches for Classifying Respondents Into Multiple Levels. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 187-200. doi:10.1177/0146621613509723

van Buuren, N., & Eggen, T. J. H. M.. (2017). Latent-Class-Based Item Selection for Computerized Adaptive Progress Tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 5(2), 22-43. doi:10.7333/1704-0502022

Edmonds, J., & Armstrong, R. D.. (2009). A mixed integer programming model for multiple stage adaptive testing. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 342-350.

van Groen, M. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2016). Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Classifying Examinees With Within-Dimensionality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 387-404. doi:10.1177/0146621616648931

Edwards, M. C., Flora, D. B., & Thissen, D.. (2012). Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing With Uniform Item Exposure. Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 118-141. doi:10.1080/08957347.2012.660363

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2006). Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1177/0146621606288890

Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., & et. al.,. (1989). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2007). A review of item exposure control strategies for computerized adaptive testing developed from 1983 to 2005. Journal of Technology,Learning, and Assessment,, 5(8).

ge07-01.pdf (319.09 KB)

Bayliss, M. S., Dewey, J. E., Dunlap, I., & et. al.,. (2003). A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: The Headache Impact Test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 953-961.

Chang, C. - H., Boni-Saenz, A. A., Durazo-Arvizu, R. A., DesHarnais, S., Lau, D. T., & Emanuel, L. L.. (2007). A system for interactive assessment and management in palliative care. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 33, 745-55.

Miscellaneous

Armstrong, R. D., & Edmonds, J. J.. (2003). The assembly of multiple stage adaptive tests with discrete items. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council Report.

Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., Stocking, M., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Engdahl, B. (1992). Computerized adaptive assessment of cognitive abilities among disabled adults. ERIC Document No ED301274.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories (Measurement and Research Department Rep 96-3). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Eignor, D. R. (1993). Deriving comparable scores for computer adaptive and conventional tests: An example using the SAT. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., & Eignor, D. R.. (2002). An exploration of potentially problematic adaptive tests. Research Report 02-05).

Eggen, T. (1998). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Measurement and Research Department Report, 98-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Stocking, M. L., Steffen, M., & Eignor, D. R.. (2001). A method for building a realistic model of test taker behavior for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 01-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2004). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Report 2004-2). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito Group.

Eggen, T. (2001). Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2001-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO Groep.

eg01-1.pdf (275.57 KB)

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. R., & Kirsch, I.. (1998). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Way, W. D., Gawlick, L. A., & Eignor, D. R.. (2001). Scoring alternatives for incomplete computerized adaptive tests (Research Report 01-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Rijn, P. W. van,, Eggen, T., Hemker, B. T., & Sanders, P. F.. (2000). A selection procedure for polytomous items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000-5). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Report

Veldkamp, B. P., Verschoor, A. J., & Eggen, T.. (2007). A multiple objective test assembly approach for exposure control problems in computerized adaptive testing (No. 2007-1). Measurement and Research Department Reports. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Pages