Export 276 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
. (1991). Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 278-290. presented at the Oct.
. (1991). Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4, 25-28.
. (1991). An empirical comparison of self-adapted and maximum information item selection. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.
. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2: Reliability, validity, and comparability to paper and pencil administration. In Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the MMPI/MMPI-2. Minneapolis MN.
. (1992). Effects of feedback during self-adapted testing on estimates of ability. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
. (1992). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NMCE. San Francisco.
. (1993). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3791.
. (1993). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using an adaptive test. In Unpublished manuscript. (.
. (1993). Establishing time limits for the GRE computer adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE general test (GRE Board Technical Report 88-8; Educational Testing Service Research Rep No RR 93-07). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
. (1993). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, adaptive, and self-adapted testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEARA. Atlanta GA.
. (1993). A simulated comparison of testlets and a content balancing procedure for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1993). A simulated comparison of two content balancing and maximum information item selection procedures for an adaptive certification examination. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Atlanta.
. (1994). ADTEST: A computer-adaptive tests based on the maximum information principle. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 680-686.
. (1994). Comparing computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests: The influence of examinee achievement locus of control. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.
. (1994). L'évaluation nationale individualisée et assistée par ordinateur [Large scale assessment: Tailored and computerized]. In Québec: Proceeding of the 14th Congress of the Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Montréal: Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (AQPC).
. (1994). The relationship between examinee anxiety and preference for self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education , 7, 81-91.
. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). The selection of test items for decision making with a computer adaptive test. In Paper presented at the national meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans LA.
. (1994). Utilisation de la simulation en tant que méthodologie de recherche [Simulation methodology in research]. In . Association pour la recherche au collégial (Ed.) : L'en-quête de la créativité [In quest of creativity]. Proceeding of the 6th Congress of the ARC. Montréal: Association pour la recherche au collégial (ARC).
. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-71. presented at the Oct.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Computer-adaptive testing: A new breed of assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95, 1326-1327.
. (1995). Effects and underlying mechanisms of self-adapted testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 103-116.
. (1995). El control de la exposicin de los items en tests adaptativos informatizados [Item exposure control in computerized adaptive tests]. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Universidad Autonma de Madrid, Spain.
. (1996). Can examinees use a review option to positively bias their scores on a computerized adaptive test? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education, New York. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National council on Measurement in Education. New York NY.
. (1996). Comparison of SPRT and sequential Bayes procedures for classifying examinees into two categories using a computerized test. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 21, 405-414.
. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.
. (1996). Conducting self-adapted testing using MicroCAT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 821-827.
. (1996). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
. (1996). Metodos sencillos para el control de las tasas de exposicion en tests adaptativos informatizados [Simple methods for item exposure control in CATs]. Psicologica, 17, 161-172.
. (1996). Propiedades psicometricas du un test adaptivo informatizado do vocabulario ingles [Psychometric properties of a computerized adaptive tests for the measurement of English vocabulary]. Estudios de Psicologica, 55, 61-73.
. (1996). A Type I error rate study of a modified SIBTEST DIF procedure with potential application to computerized adaptive tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Alberta Canada.
. (1997). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
. (1997). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595-600. presented at the Aug.
. (1997). Identifying similar item content clusters on multiple test forms. In Paper presented at the Psychometric Society meeting. Gatlinburg, TN, June.
. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.
. (1997). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 210-221.
. (1997). The role of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 85-98.
. (1997). Self-adapted testing: Improving performance by modifying tests instead of examinees. Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 10(1), 83-104.
. (1997). A simulation study of the use of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression procedures for assessing DIF in a CAT environment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago IL.
. (1997). Una solución a la estimatión inicial en los tests adaptivos informatizados [A solution to initial estimation in CATs.]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 2, 1-6.
. (1997). Validation of CATSIB To investigate DIF of CAT data. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. USA.
. (1998). A comparison of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 311-327.
. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.
. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.
. (1999). Alternative item selection strategies for improving test security and pool usage in computerized adaptive testing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education< Montreal. Canada.
. (1999). Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 141-157.
. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.
. (1999). The effects of test difficulty manipulation in computerized adaptive testing and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 167-184.
. (1999). The effects of test difficulty manipulation in computerized adaptive testing and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 167-184.
. (1999). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design. (No. BBB16784). LSAC Computerized Testing Report. Princeton, NJ. USA: Law School Admission Council.