Sympson, J. B., Weiss, D. J., & Ree, M. J.. (1982). Predictive validity of conventional and adaptive tests in an Air Force training environment (Report AFHRL-TR-81-40). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.

Hardwicke, S., & White, K. E.. (1983). Predictive utility evaluation of adaptive testing: Results of the Navy research. Falls Church VA: The Rehab Group Inc.

Lord, F. M. (1974). Practical methods for redesigning a homogeneous test, also for designing a multilevel test (RB-74-30). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Holman, R., Glas, C. A., Lindeboom, R., Zwinderman, A. H., & de Haan, R. J.. (2004). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.

Mills, C. N., & Stocking, M. L.. (1995). Practical issues in large-scale high-stakes computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-23). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1998). Person fit based on statistical process control in an adaptive testing environment (Research Report 98-13). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Robinson, D., Porporino, F. J., & Millson, W. A.. (1991). Patterns of alcohol and drug use among federal offenders as assessed by the Computerized Lifestyle Screening Instrument. Ottawa, ON. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

Olivier, P. (1973). An overview of tailored testing (unpublished manuscript). Florida State University, Program of Educational Evaluation and Research Design.

Eggen, T. (2001). Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Reports 2001-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO Groep.

Eggen, T., & Verschoor, A. J.. (2004). Optimal testing with easy items in computerized adaptive testing (Measurement and Research Department Report 2004-2). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito Group.

van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Optimal stratification of item pools in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 00-07). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1996). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 96-34). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Harmes, J. C., Kromrey, J. D., & Parshall, C. G.. (2001). Online item parameter recalibration: Application of missing data treatments to overcome the effects of sparse data conditions in a computerized adaptive version of the MCAT. Unpublished manuscript.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). A new method of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Spray, J. A. (1993). Multiple-category classification using a sequential probability ratio test (Research report 93-7). Iowa City: American College Testing.

Yi, Q., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). Multiple stratification CAT designs with content control. Unpublished manuscript.

Angoff, W. H. Huddleston, E. M. (1958). The multi-level experiment: A study of a two-level test system for the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Jodoin, M. (2003). A multidimensional IRT mechanism for better understanding adaptive test behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2000). Multidimensional adaptive testing with constraints on test content (Research Report 00-11). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J. (1997). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion (Research Report 97-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., Reynolds, T. J., & McCormick, D. J.. (1976). Monte carlo results from a computer program for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 2). Los Angeles CA: University of California, Department of Psychology.

van der Linden, W. J. (2002). Modifications of the Sympson-Hetter method for item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2000). Modifications of the branch-and-bound algorithm for application in constrained adaptive testing (Research Report 00-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

McBride, J. R., & Cooper, R. R.. (1997). Modification of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) for use by recruiters in all military services. Final Technical Report FR-WATSD-97-24, Contract No. MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Mislevy, R. J., & Wu, P. - K.. (1996). Missing responses and IRT ability estimation: Omits, choice, time limits, and adaptive testing (Research Report RR-96-30-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Li, Y. H. (2002). MIRTCAT [computer software]. Upper Marlboro MD: Author.

Vos, H. J. (1997). A minimax sequential procedure in the context of computerized adaptive mastery testing (Research Report 97-07). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Vos, H. J. (1999). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing (Research Report 99-04). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Quan, B., Park, T. A., Sandahl, G., & Wolfe, J. H.. (1984). Microcomputer network for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) (TR-84-33). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Armstrong, R. D., & Roussos, L.. (2003). A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1992). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Educational Testing Service Research Report (RR-92-37): Princeton NJ.

Stocking, M. L., Steffen, M., & Eignor, D. R.. (2001). A method for building a realistic model of test taker behavior for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 01-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Lawrence, I., & Feigenbaum, M.. (1997). Linking scores for computer-adaptive and paper-and-pencil administrations of the SAT (Research Report No 97-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Laurier, M. (1993). Les tests adaptatifs en langue seconde. Communication lors de la 16e session d’étude de l’ADMÉÉ à Laval. Montréal: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation.

Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P.. (1992). The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.

Raîche, G.. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.

Thomas, T. J., & Green, B. F.. (1989). Item-presentation controls for computerized adaptive testing: Content-balancing versus min-CAT (Research Report 89-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Laboratory.

Eggen, T. (1998). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Measurement and Research Department Report, 98-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Huisman, J. M. E. (1999). Item nonresponse: Occurrence, causes and imputation of missing answers to test items. (M and T Series No 32). Leiden: DSWO Press.

Hetter, R. D., Bloxom, B. M., & Segall, D. O.. (1993). Item Calibration: Medium-of-administration effect on computerized adaptive scores (TR-93-9). Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Rudner, L. M. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.

Smith, R. W., Plake, B. S., & de Ayala, R. J.. (2001). Item and passage selection algorithm simulations for a computerized adaptive version of the verbal section of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). MCAT Monograph Series.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category decisions in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA.

Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.

Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee: Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University.

Stocking, M. L., Smith, R., & Swanson, L.. (2000). An investigation of approaches to computerizing the GRE subject tests (GRE Board Professional Report No 93-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 00-4). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M., & Golub-Smith, M. L.. (1993). Introduction of a computer adaptive GRE General test (Research Report 93-57). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R.. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Reckase, M. D. (1989). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Gialluca, K. A.. (1977). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Urry, V. W. (1971). Individualized testing by Bayesian estimation. Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing Project 0171-177.

Lord, F. M. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2001). Implementing content constraints in a-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach (Research Report 01-001). University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2005). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Law School Admission Council, Computerized Testing Report 01-09.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2001). Implementing constrained CAT with shadow tests for large item pools. Submitted for publication.