Export 175 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is E [Clear All Filters]
. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.
. (2004). Effects of practical constraints on item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 149-174.
. (2007). The effect of including pretest items in an operational computerized adaptive test: Do different ability examinees spend different amounts of time on embedded pretest items?. Educational Assessment, 12, 161-173.
. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
. (2004). Évaluation et multimédia dans l'apprentissage d'une L2 [Assessment and multimedia in learning an L2]. ReCALL, 16, 475-487.
. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.
. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.
. (1998). The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. J Outcome Meas, 2, 97-122.
. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.
. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.
. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.
. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
. (2000). An exploratory analysis of item parameters and characteristics that influence item level response time. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 1812.
. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.
. (2003). An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 24-42.
. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.
. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74, 1125-8. presented at the Oct.
. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2004). Estimating ability and item-selection strategy in self-adapted testing: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 379-396.
. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30, 479-84.
. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.
. (1987). The effect of item parameter estimation error on decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (No. Research Report 87-1). ACT Research Report Series. Iowa City, IA. USA: DTIC Document.
. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.
. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.
. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.
. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.
. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257-265.
. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.
. (2000). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.
. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.
. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.
. (2007). Evaluation of computer adaptive testing systems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 70-87.
. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.
. (2004). Évaluation et multimédia dans l'apprentissage d'une L2 [Assessment and multimedia in learning an L2]. ReCALL, 16, 475-487.
. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
. (2006). Equating scores from adaptive to linear tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 493-508.
. (2000). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.
. (2001). Evaluation of an MMPI-A short form: Implications for adaptive testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 76-89.
. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.
. (2006). Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 1-15.
. (2000). An examination of the reliability and validity of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 570.
. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
. (2007). The effect of including pretest items in an operational computerized adaptive test: Do different ability examinees spend different amounts of time on embedded pretest items?. Educational Assessment, 12, 161-173.
. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 278-287.
. (2000). Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Medical Care, 38, II60-II65.
. (2023). Expanding the Meaning of Adaptive Testing to Enhance Validity. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 10(2), 22-31. doi:10.7333/2305-1002022
. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965-973.