Holman, R., Glas, C. A., Lindeboom, R., Zwinderman, A. H., & de Haan, R. J.. (2004). Practical methods for dealing with 'not applicable' item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the Jun 16.

Green, B. F. (1983). The promise of tailored tests. In . H. Wainer and S. Messick (Eds.). Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 69-80). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al.. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22-31. presented at the May.

Glas, C. A. W. (1998). Quality control of on-line calibration in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Guo, F. (2009). Quantifying the impact of compromised items in CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1988). The Rasch model and missing data, with an emphasis on tailoring test items. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. presented at the April 5-9, New Orleans, LA. USA.

Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The Rasch model and multi-stage testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 13, 45-52.

Georgiadou, E., Triantafillou, E., & Economides, A. A.. (2007). A review of item exposure control strategies for computerized adaptive testing developed from 1983 to 2005. Journal of Technology,Learning, and Assessment,, 5(8).

Way, W. D., Gawlick, L. A., & Eignor, D. R.. (2001). Scoring alternatives for incomplete computerized adaptive tests (Research Report 01-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A.. (2004). Siette: a web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.

Gushta, M. M. (2003). Standard-setting issues in computerized-adaptive testing. In Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education. Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 30th, 2003.

Giouroglou, H., & Economides, A. A.. (2004). State-of-the-art and adaptive open-closed items in adaptive foreign language assessment. In . Proceedings 4th Hellenic Conference with ternational Participation: Informational and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens,747-756.

van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2007). Statistical aspects of adaptive testing. In . C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 27: Psychometrics) (pp. 801838). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (No. 98-01) (p. 28). Enschede, The Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Univeersity of Twente.

Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Baghi, H., Ferrara, S. F., & Gabrys, R.. (1992). Student attitudes toward computer-adaptive test administration. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco CA.

Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D.. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.

Guo, F., Way, W. D., & Reshetar, R.. (2000). Test security and the development of computerized tests. In Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education invited symposium: Maintaining test security in computerized programs–Implications for practice. New Orleans.

Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z.. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436. presented at the Sep.

Legree, P. J., Fischl, M. A., Gade, P. A., & Wilson, M.. (1998). Testing word knowledge by telephone to estimate general cognitive aptitude using an adaptive test. Intelligence, 26, 91-98.

Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2010). Testlet-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing. In Elements of Adaptive Testing (pp. 387-409). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8

Vos, H. J., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2000). Testlet-based adaptive mastery testing, W. In . J. van der Linden (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 289-309). Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Gershon, R. C.. (1990). Test-retest consistency of computer adaptive tests. annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. presented at the 04/1990, Boston, MA USA.

de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1977). A two-stage testing procedure (Memorandum 403-77). University of Leyden, The Netherlands, Educational Research Center.

Makransky, G., & Glas, C. A. W.. (2011). Unproctored Internet test verification: Using adaptive confirmation testing. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 608-630.

Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D.. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11, 304-314.

Lai, H., Alves, C., & Gierl, M. J.. (2009). Using automatic item generation to address item demands for CAT. In . D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H.. (2018). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 42-57. doi:10.1177/0146621617726788

Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., et al.. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.

Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., et al.. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.

Green, B. F., & Thomas, T. J.. (1990). Utility of predicting starting abilities in sequential computer-based adaptive tests (Research Report 90-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

Rebollo, P., Castejon, I., Cuervo, J., Villa, G., Garcia-Cueto, E., Diaz-Cuervo, H., et al.. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Forbey, J. D., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Gartland, D.. (2009). Validation of the MMPI-2 computerized adaptive version (MMPI-2-CA) in a correctional intake facility. Psychological Services, 6, 279-292.

Gialluca, K. A. (2011). Walking the Tightrope: Using Better Content Control to Improve CAT. In Annual Conference of the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing. presented at the 10/2011.

de Gruijter, D. N. (1987). Wilcox' closed sequential testing procedure in stratified item domains. Methodika, 1(1), 3-12.