Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & de Ayala, R. J.. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 129-143.

Kim, J., Chung, H., Dodd, B. G., & Park, R.. (2012). Panel Design Variations in the Multistage Test Using the Mixed-Format Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 574-588. doi:10.1177/0013164411428977

Kang, H. - A., & Chang, H. - H.. (2016). Parameter Drift Detection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Informational Distance/Divergence Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 534-550. doi:10.1177/0146621616663676

Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicologica, 21, 135-155.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Zara, A.. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.

Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B.. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 2061-2066. presented at the Sep.

Luo, X., Kim, D., & Dickison, P.. (2017). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 275 - 290. presented at the 2018/06/01. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617726790

Ware, J. E., J., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M.. (2000). Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38, 73-82.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Kosinski, M., & Ni, P.. (2004). Score comparability of short forms and computerized adaptive testing: Simulation study with the activity measure for post-acute care. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 661-6. presented at the Apr.

Krathwohl, D. R., & Huyser, R. J.. (1956). The sequential item test. American Psychologist, 2, 419.

de Ayala, R. J., Dodd, B. G., & Koch, W. R.. (1990). A simulation and comparison of flexilevel and Bayesian computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 227-239.

Smits, N., Finkelman, M. D., & Kelderman, H.. (2016). Stochastic Curtailment of Questionnaires for Three-Level Classification: Shortening the CES-D for Assessing Low, Moderate, and High Risk of Depression. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 22-36. doi:10.1177/0146621615592294

Kalinowski, K. E., Natesan, P., & Henson, R. K.. (2014). Stratified Item Selection and Exposure Control in Unidimensional Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Two-Dimensional Data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 563-576. doi:10.1177/0146621614536768

Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., & Kehoe, J.. (1977). TAILOR: A FORTRAN procedure for interactive tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 767-769.

Kamakura, W. A.,, & Balasubramanian, S. K.. (1989). Tailored interviewing: An application of item response theory for personality measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 502-519.

Kalisch, S. J. (1973). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 111-120.

Kalisch, S. J. (1974). A tailored testing model employing the beta distribution and conditional difficulties. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 22-28.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kolen, M. J. (1999). Threats to score comparability with applications to performance assessments and computerized adaptive tests. Educational Assessment, 6, 73-96.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Kingsbury, G. G., & Wise, S. L.. (2020). Three Measures of Test Adaptation Based on Optimal Test Information. Journal of Computerized Adaotive Testing, 8(1), 1-19. doi:10.7333/2002-0801001

Luo, X., & Kim, D.. (2018). A Top-Down Approach to Designing the Computerized Adaptive Multistage Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55, 243-263. doi:10.1111/jedm.12174

Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., Read, J. P., De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., Acton, G. S., et al.. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.

Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., Read, J. P., De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., Acton, G. S., et al.. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.

Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., Read, J. P., De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., Acton, G. S., et al.. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29, 1180-1189.

Kappauf, W. E. (1969). Use of an on-line computer for psychological testing with the up-and-down method. American Psychologist, 24, 207-211.

Velozo, C. A., Kielhofner, G., & Lai, J. - S.. (1999). The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 83-90.

Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., et al.. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361-8. presented at the Apr.

van der Linden, W. J., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (2003). Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 68, 251-265.

Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Schmid, G., et al.. (2004). Validating the German computerized adaptive test for anxiety on healthy sample (A-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1515.

Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Schmid, G., et al.. (2004). Validating the German computerized adaptive test for anxiety on healthy sample (A-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1515.

Barthel, D., Otto, C., Nolte, S., Meyrose, A. - K., Fischer, F., Devine, J., et al.. (2017). The validation of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in a clinical sample: study design, methods and first results of the Kids-CAT study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1105–1117. presented at the May. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1437-9

Wainer, H.,, Lewis, C., Kaplan, B,, & Braswell, J.. (1990). An adaptive algebra test: A testlet-based, hierarchically structured test with validity-based scoring. ETS Technical Report 90-92.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1979). An adaptive testing strategy for mastery decisions (Research Report 79-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Kiely, G. L., Zara, A., & Weiss, D. J.. (1983). Alternate forms reliability and concurrent validity of adaptive and conventional tests with military recruits. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). An alternate-forms reliability and concurrent validity comparison of Bayesian adaptive and conventional ability tests (Research Report 80-5). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Kingsbury, G. G.. (1977). Calibration of an item pool for the adaptive measurement of achievement (Research Report 77-5). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Ward, W. C., Kline, R. G., & Flaugher, J.. (1986). College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Kubisiak, U. C., & Buck, D. E.. (2000). Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.

Kalisch, S. J. (1980). Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1999). CUSUM-based person-fit statistics for adaptive testing (Research Report 99-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (2000). Detection of person misfit in computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items (Research Report 00-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Kreitzberg, C. B., & Jones, D. J.. (1980). An empirical study of a broad range test of verbal ability. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Chang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J.. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (ACT Research 2000-4). Iowa City IA, ACT, Inc.

Huang, C. - Y., Kalohn, J. C., Lin, C. - J., & Spray, J.. (2000). Estimating item parameters from classical indices for item pool development with a computerized classification test (Research Report 2000-4). Iowa City IA: ACT Inc.

Zara, A., Bosma, J., & Kaplan, R.. (1987). Functional and design specifications for the National Council of State Boards of Nursing adaptive testing system. Unpublished manuscript.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Harmes, J. C., Kromrey, J. D., & Parshall, C. G.. (2001). Online item parameter recalibration: Application of missing data treatments to overcome the effects of sparse data conditions in a computerized adaptive version of the MCAT. Unpublished manuscript.

van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R.. (1998). Person fit based on statistical process control in an adaptive testing environment (Research Report 98-13). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1979). Problems in application of latent-trait models to tailored testing (Research Report 79-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology", (also presented at National Council on Measurement in Education, 1979: ERIC No. ED 177 196) note = ".

Krathwohl, D. (1959). Progress report on the sequential item test. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University, Bureau of Educational Research.

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D. R., & Kirsch, I.. (1998). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks (Research Report 98-08). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Killcross, M. C. (1976). A review of research in tailored testing (Report APRE No. 9/76, Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Ministry of Defence, Army Personnel Research Establishment.).

Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Simulating the null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests (Research Report 98-02). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Wainer, H.,, Kaplan, B., & Lewis, C.. (1991). Some empirical guidelines for building testlets (Technical Report 91-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A.. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands : University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.