Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Eignor, D. R., Way, W. D., Stocking, M., & Steffen, M.. (1993). Case studies in computerized adaptive test design through simulation (Research Report 93-56). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

McBride, J. R., & Cooper, R. R.. (1997). CAST 5 for Windows users' guide. Contract No. "MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Luecht, R. M. (1998). CASTISEL [Computer software]. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.

Hol, A. M. (2006). A CAT with personality and attitude. Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.

Sticha, P. J., & Barber, G.. (2003). CAT-ASVAB prototype Internet delivery system: Final report (FR-03-06). Arlington VA: Human Resources Rsearch Organization.

Segall, D. O. (1994). CAT-GATB simulation studies. San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Wainer, H.,, & Kiely, G. L.. (1986). CATs, testlets, and test construction: A rationale for putting test developers back into CAT (Technical Report 86-71). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service, Program Statistics Research.

Nandakumar, R., & Roussos, L.. (1997). CATSIB: A modified SIBTEST procedure to detect differential item functioning in computerized adaptive tests (Research report). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Geranpayeh, A. (2001). CB BULATS: Examining the reliability of a computer based test using test-retest method. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, Issue 5, July 2001, pp.

Robin, F. (2000). CBTS: Computer-based testing simulation and analysis [computer software]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Stenson, H., Graves, P., Gardiner, J., & Dally, L.. (1991). Collected works on the legal aspects of computerized adaptive testing. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc.

Ward, W. C., Kline, R. G., & Flaugher, J.. (1986). College Board computerized placement tests: Validation of an adaptive test of basic skills (Research Report 86-29). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M.. (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report No 95-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 98-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Chang, S. - W., & Twu, B. - Y.. (1998). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Research Report Series 98-3, Iowa City: American College Testing.

Kingsbury, G. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). A comparison of adaptive, sequential, and conventional testing strategies for mastery decisions (Research Report 80-4). Minneapolis, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Frick, T. W. (1989). A comparison of an expert systems approach to computerized adaptive testing and an IRT model. Unpublished manuscript (submitted to American Educational Research Journal).

Bryson, R. (1971). A comparison of four methods of selecting items for computer-assisted testing (Technical Bulletin STB 72-5). San Diego: Naval Personnel and Training Research Laboratory.

Parker, S. B., & McBride, J. R.. (1990). A comparison of Rasch and three-parameter logistic models in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished manuscript.

Schnipke, D. L., & Reese, L. M.. (1999). A comparison of testlet-based test designs for computerized adaptive testing (LSAC Computerized Testing Report 97-01). Newtown, PA: LSAC.

Pine, S. M., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A comparison of the fairness of adaptive and conventional testing strategies (Research Report 78-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Nicewander, W. A., Chang, H. S., & Doody, E. N.. (1981). A comparison of two methods of interactive testing Final report. National Institute of Education Grant 79-1045.

Bergstrom, B. A., & Lunz, M. E.. (1991). Comparisons of computer adaptive and pencil and paper tests. Chicago IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H.. (1998). Computer adaptive testing – Approaches for item selection and measurement. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Brunswick NJ.

Ferguson, R. L. (1971). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh R and D Center.

Ferguson, R. L. (1970). Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

Linacre, J. M. (1987). A computer program for adaptive testing by microcomputer (MESA Memorandum No 40). Chicago: University of Chicago. (ERIC ED 280 895.).

De Witt, J. J., & Weiss, D. J.. (1974). A computer software system for adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-1). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. MESA Memorandum No 9. Chicago : MESA psychometric laboratory, Unversity of Chicago.

Ferguson, R. L. (1969). Computer-assisted criterion-referenced measurement (Working Paper No 49). Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning and Research Development Center. (ERIC No. ED 037 089).

Schmidt, F. L., Urry, V. W., & Gugel, J. F.. (1977). Computer-assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluation (PB-276 748). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Urry, V. W. (1974). Computer-assisted testing: The calibration and evaluation of the verbal ability bank (Technical Study 74-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Urry, V. W. (1976). Computer-assisted testing with live examinees: A rendezvous with reality (TN 75-3). Washington DC: U. S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hansen, D. N., Johnson, B. F., Fagan, R. L., Tan, P., & Dick, W.. (1974). Computer-based adaptive testing models for the Air Force technical training environment: Phase I: Development of a computerized measurement system for Air Force technical Training. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 1-86 (MS No. 882). AFHRL Technical Report 74-48.

Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D.. (2004). Computer-based test designs with optimal and non-optimal tests for making pass-fail decisions. Research Report, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

Engdahl, B. (1992). Computerized adaptive assessment of cognitive abilities among disabled adults. ERIC Document No ED301274.

Larson, J. W. (1987). Computerized adaptive language testing: A Spanish placement exam. In Language Testing Research Selected Papers from the Colloquium, Monterey CA.

Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., Kubisiak, U. C., & Buck, D. E.. (2000). Computerized adaptive rating scales (CARS): Development and evaluation of the concept. (Institute Rep No. 350). Tampa FL: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.

Eggen, T., & Straetmans, G. J. J. M.. (1996). Computerized adaptive testing for classifying examinees into three categories (Measurement and Research Department Rep 96-3). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Storm, E. G. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing in the Bundeswehr. Unpublished manuscript.

McBride, J. R. (1982). Computerized adaptive testing project: Objectives and requirements (Tech Note 82-22). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 447).

Croll, P. R. (1982). Computerized adaptive testing system design: Preliminary design considerations (Tech. Report 82-52). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (AD A118 495).

McBride, J. R. (1982). Computerized Adaptive Testing system development and project management. Minutes of the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) Steering Committee. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Logistics), Accession Policy Directorate.

McBride, J. R. (1979). Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art (ARI Technical Report 423). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

League-for-Innovation-in-the-Community-College,. (1988). Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges. Laguna Hills CA: Author.

Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H., Brown, M., & Lillig, C.. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. (ERIC No. ED414536).

Grist, S., Rudner, L. M., & Wise,. (1989). Computerized adaptive tests. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, no. 107.

Kalisch, S. J. (1980). Computerized instructional adaptive testing model: Formulation and validation (AFHRL-TR-79-33, Final Report). Brooks Air Force Base TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory", Also Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, February 1981, 11, 20 (Ms. No, 2217) .

Du, Y., Lewis, C., & Pashley, P. J.. (1994). Computerized mastery testing using fuzzy set decision theory (Research Report 94-37). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Oltman, P. K. (1994). Computerized Testing (Research Report 94-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wingersky, M. S. (1989). A consideration for variable length adaptive tests (Research Report 89-40). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2005). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report 02-03.

van der Linden, W. J., & Veldkamp, B. P.. (2002). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests (Research Report No. 02-06). University of Twente, The Netherlands.

Bejar, I. I., & Weiss, D. J.. (1978). A construct validation of adaptive achievement testing (Research Report 78-4). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Laros, J. A., & Tellegen, P. J.. (1991). Construction and validation of the SON-R 5-17, the Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intelligence test. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Bayroff, A. G., Thomas, J. J., & Anderson, A. A.. (1960). Construction of an experimental sequential item test (Research Memorandum 60-1). Washington DC: Personnel Research Branch, Department of the Army.

Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C.. (1995). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 95-25). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1993). Controlling item exposure rates in a realistic adaptive testing paradigm (Research Report 93-2). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Thompson, J. G., & Weiss, D. J.. (1980). Criterion-related validity of adaptive testing strategies (Research Report 80-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.

Giesinger, J. M., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Conroy, T., et al.. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. presented at the March 29, 2011.