Reckase, M. D. (1986). Final report: The use of tailored testing with instructional programs (Research Report ONR 86-1). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program, Assessment Programs Area, Test Development Division.

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive testing paradigm: Validation in technical training. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (I).

Hansen, D. N., Ross, S., & Harris, D. A.. (1977). Flexilevel adaptive training paradigm: Hierarchical concept structures. AFHRL Technical Report 77-35 (II).

Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B.. (1988). The four generations of computerized educational measurement (Research Report 98-35). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (1998). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L. (2000). A framework for comparing adaptive test designs. Unpublished manuscript.

Zimowski, M. F., & Bock, R. D.. (1987). Full-information item factor analysis from the ASVAB CAT item pool (Methodology Research Center Report 87-1). Chicago IL: University of Chicago.

Wood, R. L. (1972). Fully adaptive sequential testing: A Bayesian procedure for efficient ability measurement. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.

Zara, A., Bosma, J., & Kaplan, R.. (1987). Functional and design specifications for the National Council of State Boards of Nursing adaptive testing system. Unpublished manuscript.

Bouchard, J. (1990). Future directions for the National Council: The Computerized Adaptive Testing Project. Issues, 11, 1-5(National Council of State Boards of Nursing).

Wang, X., Bradlow, E. T., & Wainer, H.,. (1992). A general Bayesian model for testlets: theory and applications (Research Report 92-21; GRE Board Professional Report No 99-01P). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E.. (1990). Generative adaptive testing with digit span items. San Diego, CA: Testing Systems Department, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Xing, D., & Hambleton, R. K.. (2001). Impact of several computer-based testing variables on the psychometric properties of credentialing examinations (Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Research Report No 393). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.

Ferguson, R. L., & Novick, M. R.. (1973). Implementation of a Bayesian system for decision analysis in a program of individually prescribed instruction (Research Report No 60). Iowa City IA: American College Testing Program.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2001). Implementing constrained CAT with shadow tests for large item pools. Submitted for publication.

van der Linden, W. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2005). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Law School Admission Council, Computerized Testing Report 01-09.

Chang, H. - H., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2001). Implementing content constraints in a-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach (Research Report 01-001). University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Cliff, N. A., Cudeck, R., & McCormick, D.. (1978). Implied orders as a basis for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 6). Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.

Reese, L. M., Schnipke, D. L., & Luebke, S. W.. (1997). Incorporating content constraints into a multi-stage adaptive testlet design: LSAC report. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Lord, F. M. (1972). Individualized testing and item characteristic curve theory (RB-72-50). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Urry, V. W. (1971). Individualized testing by Bayesian estimation. Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing Project 0171-177.

Wetzel, C. D., & McBride, J. R.. (1983). Influence of fallible item parameters on test information during adaptive testing (Tech Rep 83-15). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Bejar, I. I., Weiss, D. J., & Gialluca, K. A.. (1977). An information comparison of conventional and adaptive tests in the measurement of classroom achievement (Research Report 77-7). Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

Reckase, M. D. (1989). The interpretation and application of multidimensional item response theory models; and computerized testing in the instructional environment: Final Report (Research Report ONR 89-2). Iowa City IA: The American College Testing Program.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M. Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R.. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer-adaptive GRE General Test (GRE Board Professional Report 88-08ap; Educational Testing Service Research Report 95-20). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M., & Golub-Smith, M. L.. (1993). Introduction of a computer adaptive GRE General test (Research Report 93-57). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L., Smith, R., & Swanson, L.. (2000). An investigation of approaches to computerizing the GRE subject tests (GRE Board Professional Report No 93-08P; Educational Testing Service Research Report 00-4). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee FL: Florida State University.

Hansen, D. N., & Schwarz, G.. (1968). An investigation of computer-based science testing. Tallahassee: Institute of Human Learning, Florida State University.

Jiao, H., Wang, S., & Lau, A.. (2004). An investigation of two combination procedures of SPRT for three-category decisions in computerized classification test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego CA.

Smith, R. W., Plake, B. S., & de Ayala, R. J.. (2001). Item and passage selection algorithm simulations for a computerized adaptive version of the verbal section of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). MCAT Monograph Series.

Rudner, L. M. (1998). Item banking. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D.. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment.

Hetter, R. D., Bloxom, B. M., & Segall, D. O.. (1993). Item Calibration: Medium-of-administration effect on computerized adaptive scores (TR-93-9). Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Huisman, J. M. E. (1999). Item nonresponse: Occurrence, causes and imputation of missing answers to test items. (M and T Series No 32). Leiden: DSWO Press.

Eggen, T. (1998). Item selection in adaptive testing with the sequential probability ratio test (Measurement and Research Department Report, 98-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Thomas, T. J., & Green, B. F.. (1989). Item-presentation controls for computerized adaptive testing: Content-balancing versus min-CAT (Research Report 89-1). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Laboratory.

Raîche, G.. (1994). La simulation de modèle sur ordinateur en tant que méthode de recherche : le cas concret de l’étude de la distribution d’échantillonnage de l’estimateur du niveau d’habileté en testing adaptatif en fonction de deux règles d’arrêt. Actes du 6e colloque de l‘Association pour la recherche au collégial. Montréal : Association pour la recherche au collégial, ARC.

Janczewski, D., & Lowe, P.. (1992). The Language Training Division's computer adaptive reading proficiency test. Provo, UT: Language Training Division, Office of Training and Education.

Laurier, M. (1993). Les tests adaptatifs en langue seconde. Communication lors de la 16e session d’étude de l’ADMÉÉ à Laval. Montréal: Association pour le développement de la mesure et de l’évaluation en éducation.

Lawrence, I., & Feigenbaum, M.. (1997). Linking scores for computer-adaptive and paper-and-pencil administrations of the SAT (Research Report No 97-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Koch, W. J., & Reckase, M. D.. (1978). A live tailored testing comparison study of the one- and three-parameter logistic models (Research Report 78-1). Columbia MO: University of Missouri, Department of Psychology.

Stocking, M. L., Steffen, M., & Eignor, D. R.. (2001). A method for building a realistic model of test taker behavior for computerized adaptive testing (Research Report 01-22). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L.. (1992). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Educational Testing Service Research Report (RR-92-37): Princeton NJ.

Armstrong, R. D., & Roussos, L.. (2003). A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Unpublished manuscript.

Quan, B., Park, T. A., Sandahl, G., & Wolfe, J. H.. (1984). Microcomputer network for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) (TR-84-33). San Diego CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Vos, H. J. (1999). A minimax procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing (Research Report 99-04). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Vos, H. J. (1997). A minimax sequential procedure in the context of computerized adaptive mastery testing (Research Report 97-07). Twente, The Netherlands: Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Li, Y. H. (2002). MIRTCAT [computer software]. Upper Marlboro MD: Author.

Mislevy, R. J., & Wu, P. - K.. (1996). Missing responses and IRT ability estimation: Omits, choice, time limits, and adaptive testing (Research Report RR-96-30-ONR). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

McBride, J. R., & Cooper, R. R.. (1997). Modification of the Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST) for use by recruiters in all military services. Final Technical Report FR-WATSD-97-24, Contract No. MDA903-93-D-0032, DO 0054. Alexandria VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

Veldkamp, B. P. (2000). Modifications of the branch-and-bound algorithm for application in constrained adaptive testing (Research Report 00-05). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

van der Linden, W. J. (2002). Modifications of the Sympson-Hetter method for item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cudeck, R. A., Cliff, N. A., Reynolds, T. J., & McCormick, D. J.. (1976). Monte carlo results from a computer program for tailored testing (Technical Report No. 2). Los Angeles CA: University of California, Department of Psychology.

van der Linden, W. J. (1997). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion (Research Report 97-03). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis.

Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J.. (2000). Multidimensional adaptive testing with constraints on test content (Research Report 00-11). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, Department of Measurement and Data Analysis.

Jodoin, M. (2003). A multidimensional IRT mechanism for better understanding adaptive test behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.

Angoff, W. H. Huddleston, E. M. (1958). The multi-level experiment: A study of a two-level test system for the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Yi, Q., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). Multiple stratification CAT designs with content control. Unpublished manuscript.

Spray, J. A. (1993). Multiple-category classification using a sequential probability ratio test (Research report 93-7). Iowa City: American College Testing.