Leung, C. K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. T.. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 239-57. presented at the Nov.

Leung, C. - K., Chang, H. - H., & Hau, K. - T.. (2003). Computerized adaptive testing: A comparison of three content balancing methods. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2, 1-15.

Latu, E., & Chapman, E.. (2002). Computerised adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 619-22.

Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Skrinar, A. M., & Corzo, D.. (2005). A computer adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neuropsychology, 47, 113-120. presented at the Feb.

Carlson, R. (1994). Computer adaptive testing: A shift in the evaluation paradigm. Educational Technology Systems, 22 (3), 213-224.

Carlson, R. D. (1993). Computer adaptive testing: A comparison of four item selection strategies when used with the golden section search strategy for estimating ability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1772.

Cliff, N. A. (1975). Complete orders from incomplete data: Interactive ordering and tailored testing. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 259-302.

Riley, B. B., & Carle, A. C.. (2012). Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 124. presented at the 2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-124

Chen, S. - K. (1997). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in computerized adaptive testing using the generalized partial credit model. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 58, 453.

Chen, S. - K. (2007). The comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori in CAT using the graded response model. Journal of Elementary Education, 19, 339-371.

Chen, S., Hou, L., & Dodd, B. G.. (1998). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 569-595.

Pastor, D. A., Dodd, B. G., & Chang, H. - H.. (2002). A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 147-163.

Chen, S. Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Chen, S. - Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. - H.. (2000). A comparison of item selection rules at the early stages of computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 241-255.

Riley, B. B., Dennis, M. L., & Conrad, K. J.. (2010). A Comparison of Content-Balancing Procedures for Estimating Multiple Clinical Domains in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Relative Precision, Validity, and Detection of Persons With Misfitting Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423. doi:10.1177/0146621609349802

Riley, B. B., Dennis, M. L., & Conrad, K. J.. (2010). A comparison of content-balancing procedures for estimating multiple clinical domains in computerized adaptive testing: Relative precision, validity, and detection of persons with misfitting responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 410-423.

Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419–440.

Choi, S. W., & Swartz, R. J.. (2009). Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 419-440. doi:10.1177/0146621608327801

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245-264.

Lei, P. - W., Chen, S. - Y., & Yu, L.. (2006). Comparing Methods of Assessing Differential Item Functioning in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00015.x

Chang, S. - W., & Ansley, T. N.. (2003). A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 71-103.

McGlohen, M., & Chang, H. - H.. (2008). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavioral Research Methods , 40, 808-21. presented at the Aug.

Steele, J. A., Binnie, C. A., & Cooper, W. A.. (1978). Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 115-122.

Finkelman, M. D., Kim, W., Weissman, A., & Cook, R. J.. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 2(4), 59-76. doi:10.7333/1412-0204059

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2005). A closer look at using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 331-350.

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., Bleiler, T., Hendrickson, A. B., & Ihrig, D.. (2002). Can examinees use judgments of item difficulty to improve proficiency estimates on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests? . Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 311-330.

Lai, J. - S., Dineen, K., Cella, D., & Von Roenn, J.. (2003). Can an item response theory-based pain item bank enhance measurement precision?. Clinical Therapeutics, 25, D34-D36.

Culbertson, M. J. (2016). Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment: The State of the Field. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 3-21. doi:10.1177/0146621615590401

Bradlow, E. T., Weiss, R. E., & Cho, M.. (1998). Bayesian identification of outliers in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 910-919.

Guzmán, E., Conejo, R., & García-Hervás, E.. (2005). An Authoring Environment for Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 66-76.

Chang, H. - H., Qian, J., & Ying, Z.. (2001). a-Stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-341.

Chang, H. - H., Qian, J., & Yang, Z.. (2001). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing with b blocking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 333-41.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.

Chang, H. - H., & Ying, Z.. (1999). a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.

Yi, Q., & Chang, H. - H.. (2003). a-Stratified multistage CAT design with content-blocking. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 359–378.

Cheng, Y., Patton, J. M., & Shao, C.. (2015). a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing in the Presence of Calibration Error. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 260-283. doi:10.1177/0013164414530719

Cowan, P., & Morrison, H.. (2001). Assessment in the twenty-first century: A role of computerised adaptive testing in national curriculum subjects. Teacher Development, 5, 241-57.

Coster, W. J., Haley, S. M., Ni, P., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2008). Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 622-629. presented at the Apr.

Haley, S. M., Raczek, A. E., Coster, W. J., Dumas, H. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A.. (2005). Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-9. presented at the May.

Haley, S., Raczek, A., Coster, W., Dumas, H., & Fragalapinkham, M.. (2005). Assessing Mobility in Children Using a Computer Adaptive Testing Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 932-939.

Sinharay, S., Wan, P., Choi, S. W., & Kim, D. - I.. (2015). Assessing Individual-Level Impact of Interruptions During Online Testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 80–105. doi:10.1111/jedm.12064

Yi, Q., Z. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2006). Assessing CAT Test Security Severity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(1), 62–63.

Smits, N., Cuijpers, P., & van Straten, A.. (2011). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research, 188(1), 147–155.

Smits, N., Cuijpers, P., & van Straten, A.. (2011). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research. presented at the Jan 3.

Claudio, M. J. C. (1998). Applications of network flows to computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 0855.

Cowden, D. J. (1946). An application of sequential sampling to testing students. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41, 547-556.

Chang-Hwa, W. A., & Chuang, C. - L.. (2002). Applicable adaptive testing models for school teachers. Educational Media International, 39, 55-59.

Chang-Hwa, W. A., & Chuang, C. - L.. (2002). Applicable adaptive testing models for school teachers. Educational Media International, 39, 55-59.

van der Linden, W. J., & Chang, H. - H.. (2003). Alpha-stratified adaptive testing with large numbers of content constraints. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 107-120.

Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K.. (2002). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.

Cella, D., Chang, C. - H., Lai, J. S., & Webster, K.. (2002). Advances in quality of life measurements in oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology, 29, 60-8. presented at the Jun.

Huang, Y. - M., Lin, Y. - T., & Cheng, S. - C.. (2009). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers and Education, 52, 53-67.

Henly, S. J., Klebe, K. J., McBride, J. R., & Cudeck, R.. (1989). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.

Henly, S. J., Klebe, K. J., McBride, J. R., & Cudeck, R.. (1989). Adaptive and Conventional Versions of the DAT: The First Complete Test Battery Comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 363-371.

Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Andres, P. L., Ludlow, L. H., Ni, P., Bond, T. L., et al.. (2004). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care, 42, I49-161.

Conrad, K. J., Riley, B. B., & Dennis, M. L.. (2007). The use of computerized adaptive testing to assess psychopathology using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs. American Evaluation Association. presented at the November, Portland, OR USA: American Evaluation Association .

Vispoel, W. P., Clough, S. J., & Bleiler, T.. (2002). Using judgments of item difficulty to change answers on computerized adaptive vocabulary tests. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.